Skip to main content

Managing Temporal Knowledge in Student Modeling

  • Conference paper
User Modeling

Part of the book series: International Centre for Mechanical Sciences ((CISM,volume 383))

Abstract

Changes in the user’s knowledge represent an important factor to be considered, particularly in the dialogue between a tutoring system and a student. In previous work we have proposed a representation formalism for describing the status and the evolution over time of a temporal student model. The specific goal of this paper is to show what algorithms can be used to manage such a temporal student model. The use of temporal constraints allows a system to cope with uncertainty and incompleteness in the information available about the student’s knowledge through the description of temporal information on different levels of precision. Furthermore, nonmonotonic inferences are exploited in order to extend the temporal information available about the student’s knowledge. Finally, by introducing suitable temporal constraints into the student model, we handle in a uniform and elegant way the problem of the existence of possible contradictions in the student’s knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Dean, T., and McDermott, D. (1987). Temporal data base management. Artificial Intelligence 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dechter, R., Meiri, I., and Pearl, J. (1991). Temporal constraint networks. Artificial Intelligence 49:61–95.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Errico, B. (1996). Student modeling in the situation calculus. In Brna, P., Paiva, A., and Self, J., eds., Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Kleer, J. (1986). An assumption-based TMS. Reprinted in Ginsberg, M. L., ed., Readings in Nonmonotonic Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann, 1987. 280–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Kleer, J., and Williams, B. (1987). Diagnosing multiple faults. Artificial Intelligence 32:97–130.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors, P. (1992). Belief revision. In Handbook of Logic in AI and Logic Programming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giangrandi, P., and Tasso, C. (1995). Truth maintenance techniques for modeling student’s behaviour. Journal of AI and Education 6(2/3): 153–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giangrandi, P., and Tasso, C. (1996). Modeling the temporal evolution of student’s knowledge. In Brna, P., Paiva, A., and Self, J., eds., Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. 184–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, X. (1994). Modeling a student’s inconsistent beliefs and attention. In Greer J. E., and McCalla, G. I., eds. (1994). Student Modeling: The Key to Individualized Knowledge-Based Instruction. Springer. 267–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, X., McCalla, G. I., Greer J. E., and Neufeld, E. (1991). Revising deductive knowledge and stereotypical knowledge in a student model. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 1:87–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kono Y., Ikeda, M. and Mizoguchi, R. (1994). THEMIS: A nonmonotonic inductive student modeling system. Journal of AI and Education 5:371–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J., and Hayes P. J. (1969). Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. Reprinted in Ginsberg, M. L., ed., Readings in Nonmonotonic Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann, 1987. 26–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paiva, A., and Self, J. (1994). A learner model reason maintenance system. In Proceedings of ECAl ’94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paiva, A., Self, J., and Hartley, R. (1994). On the dynamics of learner models. In Proceedings of ECAI ’94, 163–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, R. (1980). A logic for default reasoning. Ginsberg, M. L., ed., Readings in Nonmonotonic Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann, 1987. 68–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, R., (1987). A theory of diagnosis from first principles. Artificial Intelligence 32:57–95.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Van Beek, P., (1990). Reasoning about qualitative temporal information. In Proceedings of AAAI-90, 728–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilain, M., Kautz, H., van Beek, P. (1990). Constraint propagation algorithms for temporal reasoning: A revised report. Reprinted in Weld, D., and de Kleer J., eds., Readings in Qualitative Reasoning about Physical Systems. Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

Giangrandi, P., Tasso, C. (1997). Managing Temporal Knowledge in Student Modeling. In: Jameson, A., Paris, C., Tasso, C. (eds) User Modeling. International Centre for Mechanical Sciences, vol 383. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-2670-7_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-2670-7_41

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-82906-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-2670-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics