Skip to main content

See Yourself Write: A Simple Student Model to Make Students Think

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: International Centre for Mechanical Sciences ((CISM,volume 383))

Abstract

This paper introduces See Yourself Write, a system with two components: (1) a template for tutors to provide feedback to their students on their foreign language writing, and (2) an inspectable student model which is automatically constructed for each student, based on the feedback given by the teacher. The student model holds feedback given to students across several assignments, and provides an individual evaluation of their performance. The model is designed to be viewed by the students to prompt them to reflect on and use the feedback received.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barnard, Y. F., and Sandberg, J. A. C. (1996). Self-explanations, do we get them from our students? In Proceedings of European Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education, 115–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowerman, C. (1992). Writing and the computer: An intelligent tutoring systems solution. Computers and Education 18(l-3):77–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull, S., and Pain, H. (1995). ‘Did I say what I think I said, and do you agree with me?’: Inspecting and questioning the student model. In Proceedings of the World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 501–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, S., and Smith, M. (1995). Using targeted negotiation to support students’ learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers in Education, 173–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, F. (1994). Learners’ accounts of their errors in a foreign language: An exploratory study. In Blue, G., ed, CLE Working Papers3. University of Southampton. 56–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. D. (1987). Student processing of feedback on their compositions. In Wenden, A., and Rubin, J., eds, Learner Strategies in Language Learning. London: Prentice-Hall. 57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. D., and Calvacanti, M. C. (1990). Feedback on compositions: Teacher and student verbal reports. In Kroll, B., eds., Second Language Writing, Research Insights for the Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 155–177.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, R., and Kay, J. (1994). The justified user model: A viewable, explained user model. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on User Modeling, 145–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, A. T., and Anderson, J. (1995). Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 4:253–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fathman, A. K., and Whalley, E. (1990). Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content. In Kroll, B., ed., Second language writing, research insights for the classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 178–190.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grabe, W., and Kaplan, R. B. (1996). Theory and Practice of Writing. London: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pain, H., Bull, S., and Brna, P. (1996). A student model ‘for its own sake’. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education, 191–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paiva, A., Self, J. and Hartley, R. (1995). Externalising learner models. In Proceedings of World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 509–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. (1993). On the nature of pedagogic computer tools: The case of the Writing Partner. In Lajoie, S. P., and Derry, S. J., eds, Computers as Cognitive Tools. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 179–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Self, J. (1988). Bypassing the intractable problem of student modelling. Proceedings of ITS’ 88, 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bull, S. (1997). See Yourself Write: A Simple Student Model to Make Students Think. In: Jameson, A., Paris, C., Tasso, C. (eds) User Modeling. International Centre for Mechanical Sciences, vol 383. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-2670-7_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-2670-7_32

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-82906-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-2670-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics