Advertisement

User Modeling pp 289-300 | Cite as

User Modeling and Adaptive Navigation Support in WWW-Based Tutoring Systems

  • Gerhard Weber
  • Marcus Specht
Part of the International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 383)

Abstract

Most learning systems and electronic textbooks accessible via the WWW up to now lack the capabilities of individualized help and adapted learning support that are the emergent features of on-site intelligent tutoring systems. This paper discusses the problems of developing interactive and adaptive learning systems on the WWW. We introduce ELM-ART II, an intelligent interactive textbook to support learning programming in LISP. ELM-ART II demonstrates how interactivity and adaptivity can be implemented in WWW-based tutoring systems. The knowledge-based component of the system uses a combination of an overlay model and an episodic user model. It also supports adaptive navigation as individualized diagnosis and help on problem solving tasks. Adaptive navigation support is achieved by annotating links. Additionally, the system selects the next best step in the curriculum on demand. Results of an empirical study show different effects of these techniques on different types of users during the first lessons of the programming course.

Keywords

Test Item Tutoring System Intelligent Tutoring System Text Page Overlay Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the Mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., and Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 4:167–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barr, A., Beard, M., and Atkinson, R. C. (1976). The computer as a tutorial laboratory: The Stanford BIP project. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 8:567–596.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Brusilovsky, P. (1992). Intelligent tutor, environment, and manual for introductory programming. Educational and Training Technology International 29:26–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brusilovsky, P., Schwarz, E., and Weber, G. (1996a). ELM-ART: An intelligent tutoring system on World Wide Web. In Frasson, C., Gauthier, G., and Lesgold, A., eds., Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ITS-96. Berlin: Springer. 261–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brusilovsky, P., Schwarz, E., and Weber, G. (1996b). A tool for developing adaptive electronic textbooks on WWW. Proceedings of WebNet’96, World Conference on the Web Society. Charlottesville: AACE. 64–69.Google Scholar
  7. Burow, R., and Weber, G. (1996). Example explanation in learning environments. In Frasson, C., Gauthier, G., and Lesgold, A., eds., Intelligent Tutoring Systems—Proceedings of the Third International Conference, ITS ’96. Berlin: Springer. 457–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carr, B., and Goldstein, I. (1977). Overlays: A theory of modelling for computer aided instruction (AI Memo 406). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, AI Laboratory.Google Scholar
  9. Eklund, J. (in press). Knowledge-based navigation support in hypermedia courseware using WEST. Australian Educational Computing 11.Google Scholar
  10. Johnson, W. L. (1986). Intention-Based Diagnosis of Novice Programming Errors. London: Pitman.MATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Kay, J., and Kummerfeld, R. J. (1994). An individualised course for the C programming language. Proceedings of the Second International WWW Conference “Mosaic and the Web”.Google Scholar
  12. Kolodner, J. L. (1993). Case-Based Reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  13. Lin, F., Danielson, R., and Herrgott, S. (1996). Adaptive interaction through WWW. In Carlson, P., and Makedon, F., eds., Proceedings of ED-TELEKOM 96—World Conference on Educational Telecommunications. Charlottesville, VA: AACE. 173–178.Google Scholar
  14. Pérez, T., Gutiérrez, J., and Lopistéguy, P. (1995a). An adaptive hypermedia system. In Greer, J., ed., Proceedings of AI-ED’95, 7th World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. Washington, DC: AACE. 351–358.Google Scholar
  15. Pérez, T., Lopistéguy, P., Gutiérrez, J., and Usandizaga, I. (1995b). HyperTutor: From hypermedia to intelligent adaptive hypermedia. In Maurer, H., ed., Proceedings of ED-MEDIA’95, World Conference on Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia. Graz, Austria: AACE. 529–534.Google Scholar
  16. Schwarz, E., Brusilovsky, P., and Weber, G. (1996). World-wide intelligent textbooks. In Carlson, P., and Makedon, F., eds., Proceedings of ED-TELEKOM 96—World Conference on Educational Telecommunications. Charlottesville, VA: AACE. 302–307.Google Scholar
  17. Soloway, E., Rubin, E., Woolf, B., Johnson, W. L., and Bonar, J. (1983). MENO II: An AI-based programming tutor. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 10:20–34.Google Scholar
  18. Vanneste, K., Bertels, K., and De Decker, B. (1993). The use of semantic augmentation within a student program analyser. Proceedings of the Seventh International PEG Conference. 250–260.Google Scholar
  19. Vanneste, P. (1994). The Use of Reverse Engineering in Novice Program Analysis. Ph.D. Dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.Google Scholar
  20. Weber, G. (1996). Episodic learner modeling. Cognitive Science 20:195–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Weber, G., and Möllenberg, A. (1995). ELM programming environment: A tutoring system for LISP beginners. In Wender, K. F., Schmalhofer, F., and Böcker, H.-D., eds., Cognition and Computer Programming. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation. 373–408.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerhard Weber
    • 1
  • Marcus Specht
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of TrierGermany

Personalised recommendations