Advertisement

Using Dialectical Argumentation for User Modelling in Decision Support Systems

  • Floriana Grasso
Part of the International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 383)

Abstract

Often the aim of a decision support system is to give advice rather than to inform users. This work shows how linguistic theories of dialectical argumentation can provide a user modelling framework able to take account of the user’s current perspectives and values, in addition to prior knowledge and goals.

Keywords

Decision Support System Belief State Linguistic Theory Argumentative Discourse Dialectical Argumentation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Binsted, K., Cawsey, A., and Jones, R. (1995). Generating personalised patient information using the medical record. In Barahona, P., et al., eds., Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Europe, volume 934 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 29–41.Google Scholar
  2. Carenini, G., Mittal, V., and Moore, J. (1994). Generating patient specific interactive explanations. In Proceedings of the 18th Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. McGraw-Hill Inc.Google Scholar
  3. de Rosis, F., Grasso, F., Berry, D., and Gillie, T. (1995). Mediating hearer’s and speaker’s views in the generation of adaptive explanations. Expert Systems with Applications 8(4):429–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Elhadad, M. (1995). Using argumentation in text generation. Journal of Pragmatics 24:189–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Karacapilidis, N., and Gordon, T. (1996). Dialectical planning: Designing a mediating system for group decision making. In Sauer, J., Günter, A., and Hertzberg, J., eds., Proceedings of the 10th Workshop Planen und Konfigurieren, 205–216.Google Scholar
  6. Loui, R. (1994). Argument and arbitration games. In Working Notes of the Workshop on Computational Dialectics, 12th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 72–83.Google Scholar
  7. McConachy, R., and Zukerman, I. (1996). Using argument graphs to generate arguments. In Wahlster, W., ed., Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 592–396.Google Scholar
  8. Perelman, C. (1979). The New Rhetoric and the Humanities: Essay on Rhetoric and Its Application. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Floriana Grasso
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computing and Electrical EngineeringHeriot-Watt UniversityEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations