ROMANSY 11 pp 27-35 | Cite as

An Investigation of a Quality Index for the Stability of In-Parallel Planar Platform Devices

  • J. Lee
  • J. Duffy
  • M. Keler
Part of the International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 381)


The paper investigates primarily the geometrical meaning of the determinant of the Jacobian (det j) of the three connector lines of a planar in-parallel platform device using reciprocity. A remarkably simple result is deduced: The maximum value of det j namely, det j m is simply one-half of the sum of the lengths of the sides of the moving triangular platform. Further, this result is shown to be independent of the location of the fixed pivots in the base.

A dimensionless ratio λ = │det j│/det j m is defined as the quality index (0 ≤ λ ≤1) and it is proposed here to use it to measure “closeness” to a singularity.

An example which determines the optimal design by comparing different shaped moving platforms having the same det j m is given and demonstrates that the optimal shape is in fact an equilateral triangle.


Quality Index Geometrical Meaning Equilateral Triangle Optimal Configuration Screw System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    K. J. Waldron, S. L. Wang and S. J. Bolin, “A Study of the Jacobian Matrix of Serial Manipulators,” ASME Journal of Mechanism, Transmission and Automation in Design, Vol. 107, No. 2, p. 230–238 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    H. Lipkin and E. Pohl, “Enumeration of Singular Configuration for Robotic Manipulators”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 113, p. 272–279 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    G. Beni and S. Hackwood, “Recent Advances in Robotics”, Chapter 5, Willy-Interscience Publication (1985)Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    C. Klein and B. Blaho, “Dexterity Measures for the Design and Control of Kinematically Redundant Manipulators”, The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol 6, No. 2, p. 72–83 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    M. Keler, “Kriterien der Führbarkeitseinschränkung von Effektoren in Robotern”, Maschinenbautechnik, Berlin 40, p. 155–158 (1991)Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    H. Mohammadi Daniali, P. Zsombor-Murray and J Angeles, “Singularity Analysis of Planar Parallel Manipulators”, Mech. Mach. Theory, Vol 3, No. 5, p. 665–678 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    K. H. Hunt, “Kinematic Geometry of Mechanisms”, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1978).MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    G. Gibson and K. H. Hunt, “Geometry of the screw systems–1. Screws: genesis and geometry 2. Classification of screw systems,” Mechanism and Machine Theory Vol.25, p. 1–10, 11–27 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    M. Rico Martinez and J. Duffy, “Classification of screw systems–I. One-and two-systems II. Three-systems”, Mechanism and Machine Theory Vol. 27, p. 451–458, 471–490 (1992).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    J. Angeles and C. Lopez-Cajrin, “Kinematic Isotrophy and the Conditioning Index of Serial Robotic Manipulators”, The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol 11, No. 6, p. 560–571 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    J. Duffy, “Statics and Kinematics with Applications to Robotics”, Cambridge University Press (April, 1996 )Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Lee
    • 1
  • J. Duffy
    • 1
  • M. Keler
    • 2
  1. 1.University of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.FH MunichGermany

Personalised recommendations