ROMANSY 11 pp 277-284 | Cite as

Control of a Redundant SCARA Robot in the Presence of Obstacles

  • W. Risse
  • M. Hiller
Part of the International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 381)


A redundant SCARA robot for operation in restricted work spaces is presented that performs collision free motion while simultaneously following a specified end-effector trajectory. The control system combines resolved motion rate control with secondary goals, in particular on-line collision avoidance. The implemented control algorithms are based on artificial potential fields induced by obstacles within a model of the work space. Results of experimental studies illustrate the manoeuvrability of the robot within an environment restricted by obstacles.


Collision Avoidance Work Space Redundant Manipulator Artificial Potential Field Redundant Robot 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    M. Hiller and B. Fink. Concepts for a sensor-guided redundant heavy manipulator. In Proc. of the 11th Int. Symp. on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC), Brighton, England, pages 563–570. Elsevier, May 1994.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    W. Risse, B. Fink, and M. Hiller. Multisensor-based control of a redundant SCARA robot. In 9th World Congress on the Theory of Machines and Mechanisms, Milano, Italy, volume 3, pages 2037–2041, 1995.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    M. Anantharaman, B. Fink, M. Hiller, and S. Vogel. Integrated Development Environment for Mechatronic Systems. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Mechatronics and Robotics, pages 54–69, Paderborn, Germany, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    A. Liégeois. Automatic supervisory control of the configuration and behavior of multi-body mechanisms. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC 7 (12): 868–871, 1977.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    C. A. Klein and C.-H. Huang. Review of pseudoinverse control for use with kinematically redundant manipulators. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC, 13 (3): 245–250, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    A.A. Maciejewski and C.A. Klein. Obstacle avoidance for kinematically redundant manipulators in dynamically varying environments. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 4 (33): 109–117, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Y. Nakamura, H. Hanafusa, and T. Yoshikawa. Task priority based redundancy control of robot manipulators. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 6 (4): 3–15, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    O. Khatib. Real-time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 5 (1): 90–98, 1986.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Risse
    • 1
  • M. Hiller
    • 2
  1. 1.Gerhard-Mercator UniversityDuisburgGermany
  2. 2.IMECH GmbHMoersGermany

Personalised recommendations