Advertisement

Identification of Structural Damage in Civil Engineering

  • J. T. P. Yao
Part of the International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 296)

Abstract

Civil engineering systems such as bridges, buildings, and dams are critical to survival and well-being of our society. Because of my education and background, the emphasis of these lectures is placed on the damage identification of existing structures.

Keywords

Expert System Reinforce Concrete Structural Damage Structural Engineer Structural Behavior 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrams, D.P., and Sozen, M.A., (1980) “Experimental Study of Frame-Wall Interaction in Reinforced Concrete Structures Subjected to Strong Earthquake Motions,” Structural Research Series, No. 460, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL.Google Scholar
  2. Aristizabal-Ochoa, J.D., and Sozen, M.A., (1976) Behavior of a Ten-Story Reinforced Concrete Walls Subjected to Earthquake Motions, SSRR N0: 71177 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL.Google Scholar
  3. Baldwin, J.W., Jr., Salane, H.J., and Duffield, R.C., (1978) Fatigue Test of a Three-Span Composiute Highway Bridge, Study 73–1, Department-jr Civil Engineering, University of Missouri-Columbia.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, J.L. (1978) “Determining Models of Structures from Earthquake Records,” Report No. EERL 78–01, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA.Google Scholar
  5. Burns, N.H., and Siess, C.P., (1966a) “Plastic Hinging in Reinforced Con- crete,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, 92, No. ST5, pp. 45–64.Google Scholar
  6. Burns, N.H., and Siess, C.P. (1966b), “Repeated and Reversed Loading in Reinforced Concrete,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, 92, No. ST5, pp. 65–78.Google Scholar
  7. Bowman, M.D., Nordmark, G.E., and Yao, J.T.P., (1985), “Fuzzy-Logic Approach in Structural Fatigue,” presented at NAFIPS ‘85, Atlanta, GA, 24–25 October 1985.Google Scholar
  8. Bowman, M.D., and Yao, J.T.P., (1983), “Fatigue Damage Assessment of Welded Structures,” Proceedings, W.H. Munse Symposium on Behavior of Metal Structures, Research to Practice, Edited by W.J. Hall and M.P. Gaus, ASCE National Convention, Philadelphia, PA, May 17, 1983, pp. 45–69.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, C.R., and Yao, J.T.P., (1983), “Fuzzy Sets in Structural Engineering,” to appear in Journal of the Structural Engineering Division, ASCE.Google Scholar
  10. Cecen, H., (1979) Response of Ten-Story Reinforced Concrete Frames to Simulated Earthquakes, Ph.D. Thesis, School of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL.Google Scholar
  11. Chen, S.J.H., (1980) System Identification and Damage Assessment of Existing Structures, Ph.D. Thesis, School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN.Google Scholar
  12. Distefano, N., and Pena-Pardo, B., (1975) “System Identification of Frames under Seismic Loads,” ASCE National Structural Engineering Meeting, New Orleans.Google Scholar
  13. Distefano, N., (1972) “Some Numerical Aspects in the Identification of a Class Nonlinear Viscoelastic Materials,” ZAMM 52, p. 389.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Distefano, N., and Todeschini, R., (1974) “Modeling Identification and Prediction of a Class of Nonlinear Viscoelastic Materials,” Int. J. Solids Struct. 9, I, pp. 805–818; II, pp. 1431–1438.Google Scholar
  15. Dubois, D., and Prade, H., Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Applications, Academic Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  16. Eykhoff, P., (1974), System Identification-Parameter and State Estimation, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  17. FitzSimons, N., and Longinow, A., (1975) “Guidance for Load Tests of Buildings,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, v. 101, n. ST7, pp. 1367–1380.Google Scholar
  18. Foutch, D.A., Housner, G.W., and Jennings, P.C., (1975) Dynamic Responses of Six Multistory Buildings During the San Fernando Earthquake, Report No. EERL 75–02, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 1975.Google Scholar
  19. Furuta, H., Fu, K.S., and Yao, J.T.P., (1985), “Structural Engineering Applications of Expert Systems,” Technical Report No. CE-STR-85–11, School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN.Google Scholar
  20. Furuta, H., Shiraishi, N., and Yao, J.T.P., (1986), “An Expert System for Evaluation of Structural Durability,” presented at the 5tgh International Symposium on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Tokyo, JAPAN.Google Scholar
  21. Galambos, T.V., and Mayes, R.I., (1978), “Dynamic Test of a R/C Building,” Department of Civil Engineering and Applied Science, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri.Google Scholar
  22. Gersch, W., (1975) “Parameter Identification: Stochastic Process Techniques,” Shock and Vibration Digest, 1975.Google Scholar
  23. Hinkle, A.J and Yao, J.T.P. (1986), “Linguistic Assessment of Fatigue Damage of Welded Structures,” presented at NAFIPS ‘86, New Orleans, 1–4 June 1986.Google Scholar
  24. Hart, G.C., and Yao, J.T.P., (1977) “System Identification in Structural Dynamics,” Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, v. 103, n. EM6, pp. 1089–1104.Google Scholar
  25. Healey, T.J., and Sozen, M.T., (1978), “Experimental Study of the Dynamic Response a Ten-Story Reinforced Concrete Frame with a Tall First of Story,” Civil Engineering Studies, Structural Research Series No. 450, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  26. Hidalgo, P., and Clough, R.W., (1974), Earthquake Simulator Study of a Reinforced Concrete Frame, Report No. EERC 74–13, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
  27. Hudson, D.E., (1977), “Dynamic Tests of Full-Scale Structures,” Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, v. 103, n. EM6, pp 1141–1157Google Scholar
  28. Ibanez, P., et al., (1979), Review of Analytical and Experimental Techniques for Improving Structural Dynamic Models, Bulletin 249, Welding Research Council, New York, June 1979, 44 pages.Google Scholar
  29. Ishizuka, M., Fu, K.S., and Yao, J.T.P., (1983a), “Rule-Based Damage Assessment System for Existing Structures,” Solid Mechanics Archives, Vol. 8, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Netherlands, pp. 99–118.Google Scholar
  30. Ishizuka, M., Fu, K.S., and Yao, J.T.P., (1983b), “Computer-Based System for the Assessment of Structural Damage,” Proceedings of Informatics in Structural Engineering, IABSE, Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 89–98.Google Scholar
  31. Liu, S.C., and Yao, J.T.P., (1978), “Structural Identification Concept,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, v. 104, n. ST12, December, pp. 1845–1858.Google Scholar
  32. Marmarelis, P-Z., and Udwadia, F.E., (1976), “The Identification of Building Structural Systems–II. The Nonlinear Case,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 66, n. 1, pp. 153–171.Google Scholar
  33. McJunkin, R.D., and Ragsdale, J.T., (1980), “Compilation of Sarong-Motion Records and Preliminary Data from the Imperial Valley Earthquake of 15 October 1979,” Preliminary Report No. 26, Office of Strong-Motion Studies, California Division of Mines and Geology, Sacramento, California, 1980.Google Scholar
  34. Marsi, S.F., and Anderson, J.C., (1980), “Identification/Modeling Studies of Non-Linear Multidegree Systems,” Vol. 3, Analytical and Experimental Studies of Non-Linear System Modeling, - A Progress Report AT ( 49–240262 ), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, April, 1980.Google Scholar
  35. Masri, S.F., and Caughey, T.K., (1979), “A Nonparametric Identification Technique for Non-Linear Dynamic Problems,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, ASME, Vol. 46, pp. 433–447.Google Scholar
  36. Moses, F., and Yao, J.T.P., (1984) “Safety Evaluation of Buildings and Bridges,” The Role of Design, Inspection, and Redundancy in Marine Structural Reliability, Edited by D. Faulkner, M. Shinozuka, R.R. Fiebrandt, and I.C. Franck, Committee on Marine Structures, NRC, Washington, D.C.,, pp. 549–572.Google Scholar
  37. Natke, H.G., and Cottin, N., (1986), N., (1986), “Introduction: Fundamentals and Survey”, CISM–Course on Application of System Identification in Engineering, Udine, Italy, 7–11, July 1986.Google Scholar
  38. Natke, H.G., and Yao, J.T.P., (1986a), “Research Topics in Structural Identification,” Dynamic Response of Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers, March 31–April 2, 1986, pp. 542–550.Google Scholar
  39. Natke, H.G., and Yao, J.T.P., (1986b), “System Identification Approach in Structural Damage Evaluation,” to be presented at the Structural Engineering Congress, American Society of Civil Engineers, New Orleans, 15–18 September 1986.Google Scholar
  40. Ogawa, H., Fu, K.S., and Yao, J.T.P., (1985), “A Knowledge-Based Approach for Safety Assessment of Existing Structures,” Proceedings, 4th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability, IASSAR, Kobe, Japan, Vol. IV, 27–29 May 1985, pp I1597–600.Google Scholar
  41. Okamoto, S., et al., (1982), “A Progress Report on the Full-Scale Seismic Experiment of a Seven Story Reinforced Concrete Building — Part of the U.S. Japan Cooperative Program,” Building Research Institute, Ministry of Construction, Japan.Google Scholar
  42. Park, Y.J., (1984), “Seismic Damage Analysis and Damage-Limiting Design of R.C. Buildings,” Report No. UILU-ENG-84–2007, SRS 516, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 1984.Google Scholar
  43. Rodeman, R., (1974), Estimation of Structural Dynamic Model Parameters, Ph.D. Thesis, School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN.Google Scholar
  44. Sage, A.P., and Melsa, J.L., (1971), System Identification, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  45. Shinozuka, M., and Yang, J.N., (1969), “Optimum Structural Design Based on Reliability and Proof-Land Test,” Annals of Assurance Science, Proceedings of the Reliability and Maintainability Conference, v. 8, pp. 375–391.Google Scholar
  46. Stephens, J.E., and Yao, J.T.P., (1983), “Survey of Available Structural Response Data for Damage Assessment,” Technical Report No. CE-STR-83–23, School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN.Google Scholar
  47. Stephens, J.E. (1985), Structural Damage Assessment Using Response Measurements, Thesis, Presented to Purdue University, at West Lafayette, IN, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.Google Scholar
  48. Tomlinson, G., (1986), Lecture at CISM–Course on Application of System Identification in Engineering, Udine, Italy, 7–11 July 1986.Google Scholar
  49. Ting, E.C., Chen, S.J. Hong, and Yao, J.T.P., (1978), “System Identification Damage Assessment and Reliability Evaluation of Structures,” Technical Report No. CE-STR-78–1, School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, 62 pages.Google Scholar
  50. Toussi, S., (1982), System Identification Methods for the Evaluation of Structural Damage, Ph.D. Thesis, School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN.Google Scholar
  51. Toussi, S., and Yao, J.T.P., “Assessment of Structural Damage Using the Theory of Evidence,” Structural Safety, Vol. 1, (1982/1983), pp. 107–121.Google Scholar
  52. Udawadia, F.F.., and Marmarelis, P.Z., (1976), “The Identification of Building Structural Systems–I. The Linear Case,” Bulleting of the Seismological Society of America, v. 66, n. 1, February 1976, pp. 125–151.Google Scholar
  53. Wang, T.Y., Bertero, V.V., and Popov, E.P., (1975), Hysteretic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Framed Walls, Report No. EERC 75–23, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  54. Watada, J., (1983) Theory of Fuzzy Multivariate Analysis and Its Applications, Ph.D. Thesis, University Osaka.Google Scholar
  55. Watada, J., Fu, K.S., and Yao, J.T.P., (1984), “Damage Assessment Using Fuzzy Multivariant Analysis,” Technical Report No. CE-STR-84–4, School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.Google Scholar
  56. Yang, J.N., and Trapp, W.J., (1974), “Reliability Analysis of Aircraft Structures Under Random Loading and Periodic Inspection,” AIAA Journal, v. 12, n. 12, pp. 1623–1630.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  57. Yao, J.T.P., (1980), “Identification and Control of Structural Damage,” Solid Mechanics Archives, v. 5, Issue 3, Sijthoff & Noordhoff International Publishers, Netherlands, pp. 325–345.Google Scholar
  58. Yao, J.T.P., (1985), Safety and Reliability of Existing Structures, Pitman Advanced Publishing Program, Boston, London, Melbourne, 1985.Google Scholar
  59. Yao, J.T.P., Bresler, B., and Hanson, J.M., (1984) “Condition Evaluation and Interpretation for Existing Concrete Buildings,” presented at the Symposium on Evaluation of Existing Concrete Buildings, ACI Convention, Phoenix, AZ, 8–9 March 1984.Google Scholar
  60. Yao, J.T.P., Kozin, F., Wen, Y.K., Yang, J.N., Schueller, G.I., and Ditlevesen, O., (1986) “Stochastic Fatigue, Fracture, and Damage Analysis,” presented at RILEM Symposium on Stochastic Methods in Materials and Structural Engineering, UCLA, April 3–4, 1986; to appear in Structural Safety.Google Scholar
  61. Yao, J.T.P., and Munse, W.H., (1962), “Low-Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Mild Steel,” Special Technical Publication No. 338, American Society for Testing and Materials, pp. 5–24.Google Scholar
  62. Zadeh, L.A., “Fuzzy Sets,” (1965), Information and Control, v. 8, pp. 338–353.Google Scholar
  63. Zadeh, L.A., (1973), “Outline of a New Approach to Analysis of Complex Systems and Decision Processes,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. SMC-3, No. 1, pp. 28–44.Google Scholar
  64. Zadeh, L.A., (1983), “The Role of Fuzzy Logic in the Management of Uncertainty in Expert Systems,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 11, pp. 199–227.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. T. P. Yao
    • 1
  1. 1.Purdue UniversityW. LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations