Numerical Acoustic Radiation Models

Part of the International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 296)


A phenomenon difficult to identify and quantify is the complex relation betweeen structural vibrations and the sound caused by those vibrations (structure borne,sound). This relation is important since a large percentage of the noise pollution is of structure borne nature. Whenever a mechanical structure producing vibrations is conceived, measures should be taken to reduce the sound inherent to those vibrations. To do this efficiently the sound radiation mechanism must be first identified and quantified in appropriate models. The theoretical base for such a model is known since more than a century, and is given by the solution of the 3d wave equation, with the surface velocity of the vibrating structure as boundary condition. Several theoretical studies have been devoted to this subject in the past and have resulted in analytical formulas which are only valid for a limited number of relative simple source geometries such as axisymmetric structures (spheres, cylinders) or flat plates. Analytical solutions for the general radiation problem do not exist, numerical solutions are conceivable but rather complex due to numerical instability problems, and hence require considerable computer power.


Acoustic Radiation Acoustic Power Radiation Model Radiation Efficiency Sound Power 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Junger M.C., D.Feit, ‘Sound, Structures and their interaction’, MIT, Lincoln Laboratory, Lexington, 1972, pp. 61–117.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Morse P.,Ungard K., ‘Theoretical acoustics’, McGraw-Hill NY, 1977, pp 332–366Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pierce A.D., ‘Acoustics an introduction to its physical principles and applications’ Mc. Graw-Hill NY, 1981, pp. 153–203.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Atkinson F.V., ‘On Sommerfelds radiation condition’ Phil. Mag, 1949, Vo140, deel 7, pp. 645–651Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schenk H.A., ‘Improved formulation for acoustic radiation problems’ J.A.S.A., 1968, Vol.44, deel 2, pp. 41–51Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Koopman G.H., ‘Application of sound intensity computation based on the Helmholtz equation’, Proc. 11th Int. Congress on Acoustics, 1983, Vol. 10, pp. 83–87.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burton A.J., Miller G.F., ‘The application of integral equation methods to the numericak solution of some exterior boundary value problems, Proc. Roy. Soc. London, 1976, Vol A323, pp. 201–210Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Meyer W.L, Bell W.A., Zinn B.T., Stallybrass M.P., ‘Boundary integral solutions of the three dimensional acoustic radiation problem’, J.S.V, 1978, Vol.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Filippi P.J.T., ‘Layer potentials and acoustic diffraction’ J.S.V., 1977, Vol.54, deel 4, pp. 473–500Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Copley L.G., ‘Fundamental results concerning integral representations in acoustic radiation’, J.A.S.A., 1968, Vol.44, deel 1, pp. 28–32.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vandeponseele P., Sas P., ‘Three-dimensional sound radiation models: an overview’, Proc. 11th Int. Modal Analysis Seminar, K.U.Leuven, sept.1986, Vol.2, pp. B1. 1–36.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sas P., Vandeponseele P., ‘A numerical solution of the 3-D Helmholtz integral equation for modeling the relation between structural vibration and related sound’, Proc. 8th. Int. Modal Analysis Seminar, K.U.Leuven, 1983, Vol.3B, pp 322–344.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Sas
    • 1
  1. 1.Katholieke Universiteit LeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations