Learning in Computer Soccer

  • H.-D. Burkhard
Conference paper
Part of the International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 408)


Computer Soccer is a testbed for intelligent autonomous machines and programs under real life conditions. Besides others, it provides challenging problems in the design of intelligent agents and in the field of machine learning.


Case Base Reasoning Atomic Action Apply Artificial Intelligence Agent Orient Program Layer Learn 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Kitano, H., Kuniyoshi, Y., Noda, I., Asada, M., Matsubara, H. and Osawa, H.: RoboCup: A Challenge Problem for AI. AI Magazine 18 (1): 73–85. 1997.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Official RoboCup website: http: //www. robocup. orgGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Minoru Asada, Shoichi Noda, and Koh Hosoda: Action-Based Sensor Space Segmentation for Soccer Robot Learning. In: Applied Artificial Intelligence, Volume 12, Number 2–3, 1998.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Peter Stone and Manuela Veloso: Layered Approach to Learning Client Behaviors in the RoboCup Soccer Server, In: Applied Artificial Intelligence, Volume 12, Number 2–3, 1998.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Programs for Soccer Server and Soccer Monitor are available from the page noda/soccer/server/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Brooks, R.A., “Elephants don’t play chess”, In P.Maes, editor, Designing Autonomous Agents, MIT press, 1990.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Bratman, M. E.: Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Rao, A. S. and Georgeff, M. P.: An Abstract Architecture for Rational Agents. In Nebel, B., Rich, C. and Swartout, W. (eds.): Proc. of the Third International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: 439–449. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1992.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Rao, A. S. and Georgeff, M. P.: BDI agents: From theory to practice. In Lesser, V. (ed.): Proc. of the First Int. Conf. on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS-95): 312–319. MIT-Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Jennings, N. R.: Specification and Implementation of a Belief-Desire-JointIntention Architecture for Collaborative Problem Solving. Int. Journal of Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems 2 (3): 289–318. 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Wooldrige, M. J.: This is MYWoRLD: The Logic of an Agent-Oriented DAI Testbed. In Wooldrige, M. J. and Jennings, N. R. (eds.): Intelligent Agents: 160178. LNAI 890. Springer, 1995.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Burkhard, H.-D., Hannebauer, M. and Wendler, J.: Belief-Desire-Intention Deliberation in Artificial Soccer. AI Magazine 19 (3): 87–93. 1998.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Burkhard, H. D., Hannebauer,M., Wendler, J.: AT Humboldt — Development, Practice and Theory. RoboCup-97: Robot Soccer World Cup I, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1395, Springer 1998, 357–372.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Müller-Gugenberger, P. and Wendler, J.: AT Humboldt 98 — Design, Implementierung und Evaluierung eines Multiagentensystems für den RoboCup-98 mittels einer BDI-Architektur. Diploma Thesis. Humboldt University Berlin, 1998.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Jan Wendler and Mario Lenz: CBR for Dynamic Situation Assessment in an Agent-Oriented Setting. Proceedings of the AAAI-98 Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning Integrations (Eds.: D. Aha and J. Daniels), 1988Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Lenz, M., Bartsch-Spörl, B., Burkhard, H. D., Wess, S.: Case Based Reasoning Technology. From Foundations to Applications. LNAI 1400, Springer 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • H.-D. Burkhard
    • 1
  1. 1.Humboldt University BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations