Advertisement

Advanced Numerical Modelling of Granular Soils

  • Peter Keith Woodward
Part of the International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 426)

Abstract

This chapter initially presents a brief review of the different types of constitutive soil models used in geomechanics and illustrates the implementation of a typical isotropic model. The constitutive behaviour of a double-hardening isotropic model is also highlighted as part of this review. The majority of the chapter is however concerned with the description and implementation of a multi-surface kinematic elastoplastic constitutive soil model into a finite element program. The calibration of the model to a particular sand under monotonic and cyclic loading and the results of typical boundary values problems under monotonic and dynamic loading are presented. The ability of the model to simulate earthquake induced liquefaction, through work published from the VELACS project, is also shown.

Keywords

Void Ratio Yield Surface Triaxial Compression Stress Path Excess Pore Water Pressure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anandarajah, A. (1994). Procedures for elasto-plastic liquefaction modeling of sands. J.of Engineering Mechanics, Vol 120, No. 7, 1563–1587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arulanandan, K. and Scott, R. (1994). Verification of numerical procedures for the analysis of soil liquefaction problems. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  3. Arulmoli, K., Muraleetharan, K.K., Hossain, M.M. and Fruth, L.S. (1992) VELACS, Verification of liquefaction analysis by centrifuge studies, laboratory testing program, soil data report, The Earth Technology Corporation, 13900 Alton Parkway, Suite 120, Irvine, CA.Google Scholar
  4. Been, K. and Jefferies, M.G. (1985). A state parameter for sands. Geotechnique 35, No. 2, 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bolton, M.D. and Lau C.K. (1993). Vertical bearing capacity factors for circular and strip footings on Mohr-Coulomb soil. Canadian Geotechnical Engineering Journal, 30, 1024–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. de Borst, R. & Vermeer, P.A. (1984). Possibilities and limitations of finite elements for limit analysis, Geotechnique, 34, No. 2, 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Casagrande, A. (1936) Characteristics of cohesionless soils affecting the stability of slopes and earth fills, J. Boston Soc. Civ. Engrs., 56, 257–276.Google Scholar
  8. Crouch, R.S. & Wolf, J.P. (1994). Unified 3D critical state bounding-surface plasticity model for soils incorporating continuous plastic loading under cyclic paths. Part I: Constitutive relations. Int. J. for Num. Meth. in Geomech.,Vol. 18, No. 11, 735–758.Google Scholar
  9. Crouch, R.S. & Wolf, J.P. (1994). Unified 3D critical state bounding-surface plasticity model for soils incorporating continuous plastic loading under cyclic paths. Part II: Calibration and simulations. Int. J for Num. Meth. in Geomech.,Vol. 18, No. 11, 759–784.Google Scholar
  10. Cundall, P.A. and Strack, O.D.L. (1979). A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Geotechnique 29, No. 1, 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dafalias, Y.F. and Popov, E.P. (1975). A model of nonlinearly hardening materials for complex loading. Acta Mechanica 21, 173–192.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Dafalias, Y.F. (1994). Overview of constitutive models used in VELACS. Verification of numerical procedures for the analysis of soil liquefaction problems. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1293–1303.Google Scholar
  13. Finn, W.D.L., Lee, K.W. and Martin, G.R. (1977). An effective stress model for liquefaction. Journal Geotechnical Engineering Division 103, ASCE, 517–533.Google Scholar
  14. Frydman, S. and Burd, H.J. (1997) Numerical studies of bearing capacity factor N i. J. Geo. Eng., ASCE, Vol 123, No. 1, 20–29 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Griffiths, D.V. (1982) Computation of bearing capacity factors using finite elements, Geotechnique, 32, No. 3, 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Griffiths, D.V. (1990). Failure criteria interpretation based on Mohr-Coulomb friction, J. Geo. Eng., ASCE, Vol 116, No. 6, 986–999.Google Scholar
  17. Hardin, B.O. and Hardy, W.L. (1968). Vibration modulus of normally consolidated clay, J. of Soil Mech. Div., ASCE, SM 2, 353–369.Google Scholar
  18. Hicks, M. (1990) Numerically modelling the stress strain behaviour of soils, Doctural Thesis, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
  19. Hicks, M. (1995). A computer algorithm for solving boundary value problems using the double-hardening constitutive law MONOT: I. Algorithm development, hit. J. for Num. Meth. in Geomech.,Vol. 19, 1–27 (1995).Google Scholar
  20. Hicks, M. (1995). A computer algorithm for solving boundary value problems using the double-hardening constitutive law MONOT: II. Algorithm validation, Int. J. for Num. Meth. in Geomech.,Vol. 19, 29–57 (1995).Google Scholar
  21. de Josselin de Jong, G. (1976) Rowe’s stress-dilatancy relation based on friction, Geotechnique 26, No. 3, 527–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Inel, S., Roth, W.H. and de Rubertis, C. (1993). Nonlinear dynamic effective-stress analysis of two case histories. 3rd Int. Conf. On Case Histories in Geot. Eng., St Louis, MO, June.Google Scholar
  23. Iwan, W.D. (1967). On a class of models for the yielding behaviour of continuous and composite systems. ASME J. Appl. Mech. 34, 6–12Google Scholar
  24. Jefferies, M.G. (1993). Nor-sand: a simple critical state model for sand. Geotechnique 43, 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kaddouri, A. and Woodward, P.K. (1998). Advanced numerical modelling of earthquake induced liquefaction. Proceedings 6 th Conference of SECED on Seismic Design Practice into the Next Century: University of Oxford, UK. 213–218.Google Scholar
  26. Kaddouri, A. (2000). Title to be set. Doctural Thesis, Heriot-Watt University.Google Scholar
  27. Krieg, R.D. (1975). A practical two-surface plasticity theory. ASME J Appl. Mech. 42, 641–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lade, P.V. and Duncan, J.M. (1975). Elasto-plastic stress-strain theory for cohesionless soils, J. Geotech. Eng. Div. ASCE. 107, GT10, 1037–1053.Google Scholar
  29. Lade, P.V. (1977). Elasto-plastic stress strain theory for cohesionless soil with curved yield surfaces, Int J. Solids Struct. 13, 1019–1035.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Lade, P.V. (1979). Three-dimensional stress-strain behaviour and modelling of soils, Bochum, Ruhr-Univ., Schrenreihe des Inst. F. Grundb., Wasserwesen and Verkehrswesen, Serie Grundbau, Heft 4, Aug.Google Scholar
  31. Lindenberg, J. and Koning, H.L. (1981). Critical density of sand, Geotechnique, 31, No. 2, 231–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Manoharan, N. and Dasgupta, S.P. (1995). Bearing capacity of surface footings by finite elements, Comp. Struct, 54, No. 4, 563–586.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Manzari, M.T. and Dafalias, Y.F. (1997). A critical state two-surface plasticity model for sands. Geotechnique 47, No. 2, 255–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Molenkamp, F. (1981). Elasto-plastic double hardening model MONOT, LGM Report CO-218595, Delft Geotechics.Google Scholar
  35. Molenkamp, F. (1982) Kinematic model for alternating loading ALTERNAT, LGM Report CO-218598, Delft Geotechnics.Google Scholar
  36. Molenkamp, F. (1986). Limits to the Jaumann stress rate, Int. J. for Num. Meth. in Geomech.,Vol. 10, 151–176.Google Scholar
  37. Molenkamp, F. (1987). Elasto-plastic model for the simulation of liquefaction under alternating loading, Workshop on constitutive laws for the analysis of fill retention structures, Workshop Report, Department of Civil Engineering, Univeristy of Ottawa, July, 60–194.Google Scholar
  38. Molenkamp, F. (1988). A simple model for isotropic non-linear elasticity of frictional materials, Int. J. for Num. Meth. in Geomech.,Vol. 12, 467–475.Google Scholar
  39. Molenkamp, F. (1990) Reformulation of ALTERNAT to minimise numerical drift due to cyclic loading, University of Manchester Internal Report. UK.Google Scholar
  40. Molenkamp, F. (1992). Application of non-linear elastic model, Int. J. for Num. Meth. in Geomech.,Vol. 16, 131–150.Google Scholar
  41. Mroz, Z. (1967). On the description of anisotropic workhardening. J. Mech. Physics Solids 15, 6–12.Google Scholar
  42. Naylor, D.J. (1974). Stresses in nearly incompressible materials by finite elements with applications to the calculation of excess pore pressures, Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng., 8, 443–460.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. Newmark, N.M. (1965). Effects of earthquakes on dams and embankments, Geotechnique 15, No. 2, 139–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pande, G.N. and Sharma, K.C. (1983). Multi-laminate model of clays — a numerical evaluation of the influence of rotation of the principal stress axes. Int. J. Num. Anal Meth. Geomechanics. 7, 397–418.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. Poulos, S.J. (1981). The steady state of deformation, J. of Geotech. Eng., ASCE, 107, 5, 553–562.Google Scholar
  46. Prevost, J.H. (1977). Mathematical modelling of monotonic and cyclic undrained clay behaviour, Int. J for Num. Meth. in Geomech.,Vol. 1, No. 2, 195–216.Google Scholar
  47. Prevost, J.H. (1982) Two-surface vs multi-surface plasticity theories, Int. J. for Num. Meth. in Geomech.,Vol. 6, 323–338.Google Scholar
  48. Prevost, J.H. (1985). A simple plasticity theory for frictional soils. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 4, 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Prevost, J.H. & Keane, C.M. (1990). Multimechanism elasto-plastic model for soils. J of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 116, No. 9, 1924–1945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rowe, P.W. (1962). The stress-dilatancy relation for static equilibrium of an assembly of particles in contact, Proc. Royal Soc., Vol. 269, 500–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rowe, P.W. (1971). Theoretical meaning and observed values of deformation parameters for soil, Proc. Roscoe Mem. Symp., 18, 143–194.Google Scholar
  52. Saada, A. and Bianchini, G. (1988). Constitutive equations for granular non-cohesive soils. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  53. Schofield, A.N. and Wroth, C.P. (1968). Critical state soil mechanics, McGraw-Hill, London.Google Scholar
  54. Simonini, P. (1993) Influence of relative density and stress level on the bearing capacity of sands, Int. J for Num. Meth. in Geomech.,Vol. 17, 871–890.Google Scholar
  55. Smith, I.M. and Griffiths, D.V. (1988). Programming the finite element method, 2rd Edn, Wiley, Chichester.MATHGoogle Scholar
  56. Tatsuoka, F., Iwasaki, T., Yoshida, S., Fukushima, S. and Sudo, H. (1979). Shear modulus and damping by drained tests on clean sand specimens, reconstituted by various methods, Soils and Foundations, Vol. 19, No. 1, 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Thorton, C. (1989). A direct approach to micromechanically based continuum models for granular material. In: Satake M., ed., Mechanics of Granular Materials, Report of ISSMFE Technical Committee on Mechanics of Granular Materials, Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 145–150.Google Scholar
  58. Vermeer, P.A. `Formulation and analysis of sand deformation problems’. PhD Thesis, Delft University of Technology, 1980.Google Scholar
  59. Woodward, P.K. (1993). Earthquake engineering and advanced constitutive modelling in geomechanics, by finite elements, Doctural Thesis, University of Manchester (1993).Google Scholar
  60. Woodward, P.K. (1995). Application of a kinematic elasto-plastic soil model to monotonic and cyclic loading, Proc the Sixth Int. Con. on Civil and Struct. Eng. Comp., St Johns College Cambridge, England 229–237.Google Scholar
  61. Woodward, P.K. and Griffiths, D.V. (1998) Observations on the computation of the bearing capacity factor N, byfinite elements, Geotechnique, 48, No. 1, 137–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Woodward, P.K. and Molenkamp, F. (1999). Application of an advanced multi-surface kinematic constitutive soil model, Int. J. for Num. Meth. in Geomech.,Vol. 23, 1995–2043.Google Scholar
  63. Woodward, P.K. and Nesnas, K. (2000) Analysis the behaviour of footings on sand using an advanced constitutive soil model. EPSRC Final Research Report, UK.Google Scholar
  64. Zienkiewicz, O.C., Valliappan, S. and King, I.P. (1969). Elasto-plastic solutions of engineering problems. Initial-stress, finite element approach, Int. J. for Num. Meth. in Geomech.,1, 75–100.Google Scholar
  65. Zienkiewicz, O.C. and Chang, C.T. (1978). Nonlinear seismic response and liquefaction. Int J Num. Anal. Meth. In Geomechanics,2, 381–404.Google Scholar
  66. Zienkiewicz, O.C., Leung, K.H. and Pastor, M. (1985). A simple model for transient soil loading in earthquake analysis. I: Basic model and its application, and II: Non-asociative models for sands. Int. J. Num. Anal. Meths. Geomechanics. 2, 381–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Keith Woodward
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Offshore EngineeringHeriot-Watt UniversityEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations