Simulations of Synthetic Jets and Application to Airfoil Control

  • Andrew W. Cary
  • John F. Donovan
  • Linda D. Kral
Part of the International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 415)


Synthetic jet actuators provide a novel scheme for controlling flows because they require only electrical power and not plumbing to generate a control jet. Applications for this type of actuator include separation control, thrust vectoring, enhanced mixing, and passive maneuvering. However, better understanding of the interactions between these devices and the external flow must be attained before they can be efficiently implemented on a flight vehicle. This work focuses on an approach for modeling these actuators and applying them to an airfoil to attain increased lift. A boundary condition that can be incorporated into a RANS CFD code is developed and validated for a number of different cases, including the interaction between two jets and flow over an airfoil.


Vortex Ring Centerline Velocity Thrust Vector Active Flow Control Uncontrolled Case 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen, M. G., and Glezer, A. (1995). Jet vectoring using zero net mass flux control jets. AFOSR Contractor and Grantee Meeting on Turbulence and Internal Flows, Wright-Patterson AFB.Google Scholar
  2. Amitay, M., Honohan, A., Trautman, M., and Glezer, A. (1997). Modification of the aerodynamic characteristics of bluff bodies. AIAA 97–2004.Google Scholar
  3. Cain, A. B., Kral, L. D., Donovan, J. F., and Smith, T. D. (1998). Numerical simulation of compressible synthetic jet flows. AIAA 98–0084.Google Scholar
  4. Chang, R. C., Hsiao, F. B., and Shyu, R. N. (1992). Forcing level effects of internal acoustic excitation on the improvement of airfoil performance. Journal of Aircraft 29 (5).Google Scholar
  5. Donovan, J. F., Kral, L. D., and Cary, A. W. (1998). Active flow control applied to an airfoil. AIAA 98–0210.Google Scholar
  6. Donovan, J. F. (1996). Control of shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions using tangential injection. AIAA 96–0443.Google Scholar
  7. Epstein, R. (1999). Lower order modeling of active flow control. Private Communication.Google Scholar
  8. Guo, D., and Kral, L. D. ( 1999 ). Numerical simulation of the interaction of adjacent synthetic jet actuators. submitted to AIAA Fluids 2000 Meeting.Google Scholar
  9. Hassan, A. A., and JanakiRam, R. D. (1997). Effects of zero-mass “synthetic” jets on the aerodynamics of the NACA-0012 airfoil. AIAA 97–2326.Google Scholar
  10. Hassan, A. A., Straub, E. K., and Charles, B. D. (1997). Effects of surface blowing/suction on the aerodynamics of helicopter rotor blade-vortex interactions (BVI)–a numerical simulation. American Helicopter Society Journal 42: 182–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. He, Y., and Kral, L. D. (1999). Post-stall flow control on an airfoil using localized jet actuators. submitted to 38th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting.Google Scholar
  12. Joslin, R. D., Lachowicz, J. T., and Yao, C. S. (1998). DNS of flow induced by a multi-flow actuator. In Proceedings of the ASME Fluids Engineering Conference,FEDSM98–0532.Google Scholar
  13. Kral, L. D., Donovan, J. E, Cain, A. B., and Cary, A. W. (1997a). Numerical simulation of synthetic jet actuators. AIAA 97–1824.Google Scholar
  14. Kral, L. D., Mani, M., and Ladd, J. (1997b). Application of turbulence models for aerodynamic and propulsion flowfields. AIM Journal 34 (11): 2291–2298.Google Scholar
  15. Maddalon, D. V., Collier, E. S., Montoya, L. C., and Land, C. K. (1989). Transition flight experiments on a swept wing with suction. AIAA 89–1893.Google Scholar
  16. Menter, F. R. (1993). Zonal two equation k–w turbulence models for aerodynamic flows. AIAA 93–2906.Google Scholar
  17. Rizzetta, D. P., Visbal, M. R., and Stanek, M. J. (1998). Numerical investigations of synthetic jet flowfields. AIAA 98–2910.Google Scholar
  18. Rogers, S. E., and Kwak, D. (1990). An upwind differencing scheme for the time-accurate incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. AIM Journal 28 (2): 253–262.MATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Rogers, S. E., Kwak, D., and Kiris, C. (1991). Steady and unsteady solutions of the incompressible NavierStokes equations. AIM Journal 29 (4): 603–610.Google Scholar
  20. Rogers, S. E. (1995). A comparison of implicit schemes for the incompressible navier-stokes equations with artificial compressibility. AIAA 95–0657.Google Scholar
  21. Seifert, A., and Pack, L. G. (1998). Oscillatory control of separation at high reynolds numbers. AIAA 98–0214.Google Scholar
  22. Seifert, A., Bachar, T., Koss, D., Shepshelovich, M., and Wygnanski, I. (1993a). Oscillatory blowing: A tool to delay boundary layer separation. AIAA Journal 31 (11): 2052–2060.Google Scholar
  23. Seifert, A., Daraby, A., Nishri, B., and Wygnanski, 1. (1993b). The effects of forced oscillations on the performance of airfoils. AIAA 93–3264.Google Scholar
  24. Seifert, A., Daraby, A., and Wygnanski, I. (1996). Delay of airfoil stall by periodic excitation. Journal of Aircraft 33 (4): 691–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Smith, B. L., and Glezer, A. (1997). Vectoring and small-scale motions effected in free shear flows using synthetic jet actuators. AIAA 97–0213.Google Scholar
  26. Smith, D. R., Amitay, M., Kibens, V., Parekh, D. E., and Glezer, A. (1998). Modification of lifting body aerodynamics using synthetic jet actuators. AIAA 98–0209.Google Scholar
  27. Smith, B. L., Trautman, M. A., and Glezer, A. (1999). Controlled interactions of adjacent synthetic jets. AIAA 99–0669.Google Scholar
  28. Spalart, P. R., and Alimaras, S. R. (1992). A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. AIAA 92–0439.Google Scholar
  29. Wood, N., and Nielson, J. (1985). Circulation control airfoils past, present, and future. AIAA 85–0204.Google Scholar
  30. Wu, J.-M., Lu, X.-Y., Denny, A. G., Fan, M., and Wu, J.-Z. (1997a). Post-stall lift enhancement on an airfoil by local unsteady control, Part I. lift, drag, and pressure characteristics. AIAA 97–2063.Google Scholar
  31. Wu, J.-M., Lu, X.-Y., and Wu, J.-Z. (1997b). Post-stall lift enhancement on an airfoil by local unsteady control, Part II. mode competition and vortex dynamics. AIAA 97–2064.Google Scholar
  32. Wu, J.-M., Lu, X.-Y., Denny, A. G., Fan, M., and Wu, J.-Z. (1998). Post-stall flow control on an airfoil by local unsteady forcing. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 371: 21–58.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  33. Wygnanski, I., and Seifert, A. (1994). The control of separation by periodic oscillations. AIAA 94–2608.Google Scholar
  34. Yoshihara, H., and Zonars, D. (1975). The transonic jet flap - a review of recent results. In Proceedings of the SAE National Aerospace & Manufacturing Meeting. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew W. Cary
    • 1
  • John F. Donovan
    • 1
  • Linda D. Kral
    • 2
  1. 1.The Boeing CompanySt. LouisUSA
  2. 2.Washington UniversitySt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations