Advertisement

Design Tools: Human Body Modelling

  • Jorge A. C. Ambrosio
Conference paper
Part of the International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 423)

Abstract

In crash safety research and development, like in many other engineering disciplines, a strong increase could be observed during the last thirty years in the use of computer simulations. This is due in part to the fast developments in computer hardware and software, but in case of automotive safety, probably even more due to emphasis which has been placed on the development of reliable models describing the human body in an impact situation, as well as numerous validation studies which have been conducted using these models. Mathematical models of the human body in conjunction with a mathematical description of the vehicle structure and the various safety provisions and restraint systems, appear to offer a very economical and versatile method for the analyses of the crash response of complex dynamical systems.

Keywords

Multibody System Human Body Model Joint Base Crash Simulation Crash Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [21.1]
    Lobdell T.E., Impact response of the human thorax, In Human Impact Response: Measurement And Simulation, Plenum Press, New York, 201–245, 1973.Google Scholar
  2. [21.2]
    McHenry, R.R., Analysis of the dynamics of automobile passenger restraint systems, Proceedings of the 7 117 Stapp Car Crash Conference, 207–249, 1963.Google Scholar
  3. [21.3]
    EU compatibility project,Final report for publication, European Commission, Brussel, 2000.Google Scholar
  4. [21.4]
    Shugar, T.A., A finite element head injury model, Final report Vol 1 Contract DOT HS 289–3–550–IA, NHTSA, Washington DC, July 1977.Google Scholar
  5. [21.5]
    Bruijs, W.E.M., Subcycling in Transient Finite Element Analysis. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 1990.Google Scholar
  6. [21.6]
    Robbins, D.H., Bowman, B.M. and Bennett, R.O., The MVMA two-dimensional crash victim simulation, Proceedings of the 18th Stapp Car Crash Conference, 657–678, 1974.Google Scholar
  7. [21.7]
    Robbins, D.H., Bennett, R.O. and Bowman, B.M., User-oriented mathematical crash victim simulator, Proceedings of the l6`h Stapp Car Crash Conference, 128–148, 1972.Google Scholar
  8. [21.8]
    Huston, R.L., Hessel, R. and Passerello, C., A three-dimensional vehicle-man model of collision and high acceleration studies, SAE paper No. 740725, Society of Automotive Engineers Inc., (1974).Google Scholar
  9. [21.9]
    Fleck, J.T., Butler, F.E. and Vogel, S.L., An improved three-dimensional computer simulation of motor vehicle crash victims, Final Technical Report No. ZQ-5180-L-1, Calspan Corp,. (4 Vols.), 1974.Google Scholar
  10. [21.10]
    King, A.I. and Chou, C.C., Mathematical modelling, simulation and experimental testing of biomechanical system crash response, J. Biomechanics, 9, 301–317, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [21.11]
    Wismans, J. and Obergefell, L., Data bases and analytical modelling, In AGARD Advisory Report 330 Anthropomorphic Dummies for Crash and Escape System Testing, Chapter 8, AGARD/AMP/WG21, 1996.Google Scholar
  12. [21.12]
    MADYMO Theory Manual, Version 5.4,TNO Automotive, Delft, The Netherlands, 1999.Google Scholar
  13. [21.13]
    Prasad, P., An overview of major occupant simulation models, In Mathematical Simulation Of Occupant And Vehicle Kinematics, SAE Publication P-146, SAE paper No. 840855, 1984.Google Scholar
  14. [21.14]
    Prasad, P., Comparative evaluation of the MVMA2D and the MADYMO2D occupant simulation models with MADYMO-test comparisons, In 10 1h International Technical Conference on Experimental Safety Vehicles, Oxford, 1985.Google Scholar
  15. [21.15]
    Prasad, P. and Chou, C.C., A review of mathematical occupant simulation models, In Crashworthiness and occupant protection in transportation systems, Proceedings AMD-Vol. 106, BED-Vol. 13 of the Winter Annual Meeting of ASME, 1989.Google Scholar
  16. [21.16]
    Wittenburg, J., Dynamics of Systems of Rigid Bodies, B.G. Teubner, Stuttgart, 1977.Google Scholar
  17. [21.17]
    Prasad, P. and Padgaonkar, A.J., Static-to-dynamic amplification factors for use in lumped mass vehicle crash models, SAE paper No. 810475, 1981.Google Scholar
  18. [21.18]
    Kaleps, I. and Whitestone, J., Hybrid III Geometrical and Inertial Properties, SAE paper No 880638, 1988.Google Scholar
  19. [21.19]
    Prasad P., Comparative evaluation of the dynamic response of the Hybrid II and Hybrid III dummies, SAE paper No. 902318, In Proceedings of the 34th Stapp Conference, 1990.Google Scholar
  20. [21.20]
    Obergefell, L., Kaleps, I. and Steele, S., Part 572 and Hybrid III dummy comparisons in sled test simulations, SAE paper No. 880639, SAE PT-44,1988.Google Scholar
  21. [21.21]
    J. Wismans and Hermans, J.H.A., MADYMO 3D Simulations of Hybrid III Dummy Sled Tests, SAE paper No. 880645, SAE PT-44, 1988.Google Scholar
  22. [21.22]
    Khatua, T., L. Chang and Pizialli: “ATB simulation of the Hybrid III dummy in sled tests”, SAE paper No. 880646, SAE PT-44, SAE Int. Congress and Exposition, Detroit, Society of Automotive Engineers Inc., 1988.Google Scholar
  23. [21.23]
    Huang Y., A.I. King, and Cavanaugh J.M., A MADYMO model of near-side human occupants in side impacts, J. of Biomechanical Engineering, 116, 228–235, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [21.24]
    Huang Y., A.I. King, and Cavanaugh, J.M., Finite element modelling of gross motion of human cadavers in side impact, SAE paper No 942207, 1994.Google Scholar
  25. [21.25]
    Irwin, A.L. Analysis and CAL3D Model of the Shoulder and Thorax Response of Seven Cadavers Subjected to Lateral Impacts, Ph.D. Thesis Wayne State University, 1994.Google Scholar
  26. [21.26]
    Ma D., Obergefell A., and Rizer, A., Development of human articulating joint model parameters for crash dynamics simulations, SAE paper No 952726, 1995.Google Scholar
  27. [21.27]
    Jakobsson L., Norin H., Jernstrom C., et al. Analysis of different head and neck responses in rear-end car collisions using a new humanlike mathematical model, In Proceedings of the 1994 IRCOBI Conference, 109–125, 1994.Google Scholar
  28. [21.28]
    Kroonenberg, A. van den, Thunnissen, J., and Wismans, J., A human model for low severity rear-impacts, In Proceedings of the 1997 IRCOBI Conference, 1997.Google Scholar
  29. [21.29]
    Prasad, P., and King, A.I., An experimentally validated dynamic model of the spine, J. Appl. Mech., 546–550, 1974.Google Scholar
  30. [21.30]
    Ishakawa, H., Kajzer, J., and Schroeder, G., Computer simulation of impact response of the human body in car-pedestrian accidents, In Proceedings of the 37th STAPP Car Crash Conference, SAE paper No 933129, 1993.Google Scholar
  31. [21.31]
    Yang, J.K, and Lovsund, P, Development and validation of a human body mathematical model for simulation of car-pedestrian impacts, In Proceedings of the 1997 IRCOBI Conference, 1997.Google Scholar
  32. [21.32]
    Wismans, J., Maltha, J.W., Melvin, J.W. and Stalnaker, R.L., Child restraint evaluation by experimental and mathematical simulation, In Proceedings of the 23 rd Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE paper No. 791017, 1979.Google Scholar
  33. [21.33]
    Baughman, L.D., Development of an Interactive Computer Program to Produce Body Description Data, University of Dayton Research Institute, Ohio, USA, Report nr. AFAMRL-TR-83–058, NTIS doc. no. AD-A 133 720, 1983.Google Scholar
  34. [21.34]
    Geuß H., Entwicklung eines anthropometrischen Mebsystems für das CAD-Menschmodel Ramsis, PhD thesis, München University, 1994.Google Scholar
  35. [21.35]
    R., Happee, M., Hoofman, A.J., van den Kroonenberg, P. Morsink and Wismans, J., A mathematical human body model for frontal and rearward seated automotive impact loading, In Proceedings of the 42n d Stapp Car Crash Conference, 1998.Google Scholar
  36. [21.36]
    Wismans, J., van den Kroonenberg, A.J., Hoofman, M.L.C. and van der Horst, M.J., Neck performance of human subjects in frontal impact direction, RTO Specialist’ Meeting Models for aircrew safety assessment: uses, limitations and requirements, Dayton, USA, 26–28 October 1998.Google Scholar
  37. [21.37]
    Lizee, E., Robin, S., Bertholon, N., Le Coz, J.Y., Besnault, B. and Lavaste, F., Development of a 3D Finite Element Model of the Human Body, In Proceedings of the 42m ! Stapp Car Crash Conference, Tempe, USA, November 2–4, 1998.Google Scholar
  38. [21.38]
    P. Prasad, Occupant simulation models: experiment and practice, Crashworthiness of Transportation Systems: Structural Impact and Occupant Protection, J.A.C. Ambrosio et. al. (eds), Kluwer Academic Publishers, 209–219, 1997.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jorge A. C. Ambrosio
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto Superior TécnicoPortugal

Personalised recommendations