Flexible Multibody Dynamics in Crash Analysis

  • Jorge A. C. Ambrosio
Conference paper
Part of the International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 423)


The design requirements of advanced mechanical and structural systems exploit the ease of use of the powerful computational resources available today to create virtual prototyping environments. These advanced simulation facilities play a fundamental role in the study of systems that undergo large rigid body motion while their components experience material or geometric nonlinear deformations, such as vehicles in impact and crash scenarios. If in one hand the nonlinear finite element method is the most powerful and versatile procedure to describe the flexibility of the system components on the other hand the multibody dynamic formulations are the basis for the most efficient computational techniques that deal with large overall motion. Therefore, the efficiency of the nonlinear finite elements to handle the system deformation can be combined with advantage with the representation of the system components large overall motion using a multibody dynamic approach.


Multibody System Flexible Body Flexible Multibody System Frontal Impact Contact Force Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [17.1]
    Erdman, A. G. and Sandor, G. N., Kineto-elastodynamics–a review of the state of the art and trends, Mech. Mach. Theory, 7, 19–33, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [17.2]
    Lowen, G.G. and Chassapis, C., Elastic behavior of linkages: an update, Mech. Mach. Theory, 21, 33–42, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [17.3]
    Thompson, B.S. and Sung, G.N., Survey of finite element techniques for mechanism design, Mech. Mach. Theory, 21, 351–359, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [17.4]
    Song, J.O. and Haug, E.J., Dynamic analysis of planar flexible mechanisms, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 24, 359–381, 1980.ADSCrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. [17.5]
    Shabana, A.A. and Wehage, R.A., A coordinate reduction technique for transient amalysis os spatial structures with large angular rotations, Journal of Structural Mechanics, 11, 401–431, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [17.6]
    Shabana, A.A., Dynamics of Multibody Systems, John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, 1989Google Scholar
  7. [17.7]
    Belytschko, T. and Hsieh, B.J., Nonlinear transient finite element analysis with convected coordinates, Int. J. Nume. Methods in Engng., 7, 255–271, 1973.ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [17.8]
    Simo, J.C. and Vu-Quoc, L., On the dynamics in space of rods undergoing large motions — a geometrically exact approach, Comp. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 66, 125–161, 1988ADSCrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. [17.9]
    Bathe, K.-J. and Bolourchi, S., Large displacement analysis of three-dimensional beam structures, Int. J. Nume. Methods in Engng., 14, 96 1986, 1979Google Scholar
  10. [17.10]
    Cardona, A. and Geradin, M., A beam finite element non linear theory with finite rotations, Int.J. Nume Methods in Engng., 26, 2403–2438, 1988.ADSCrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. [17.11]
    Ambrosio, J. and Nikravesh, P., Elastic-plastic deformations in multibody dynamics, Nonlinear Dynamics, 3, 85–104, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [17.12]
    Ambrosio, J.A.C. and Pereira, M.S. Multibody dynamic tools for crashworthiness and impact. In Crashworthiness Of Transportation Systems: Structural Impact And Occupant Protection (J.A.C. Ambrosio, M.S. Pereira and F.P. Silva, Eds.), NATO ASI Series E. Vol. 332, 475–521. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [17.13]
    Bathe, K.-J., Finite Element Procedures In Engineering Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1982.Google Scholar
  14. [17.14]
    Nygard, M.K. and Bergan, P.G., Advances on treating large rotàtions for nonlinear problems, In State Of The Art Surveys On Computational Mechanics (A.K. Noor and J.T. Oden, Eds.), ASME, New York, 305–333, 1989.Google Scholar
  15. [17.15]
    Wallrapp, O. and Schwertassek, R., Representation of geometric stiffening in multibody system simulation, Int. J. Nume. Methods Engng. 32, 1833–1850, 1991.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. [17.16]
    Hinton, E., Rock, T. and Zienckiewicz, O.C., A note on the mass lumping and related processes in the finite element method, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Mechanics, 4, 245–249, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17.17]
    Greenwood, D.T., Principles of Dynamics, Prentice-Hall, Englewood-Cliffs, New Jersey, New Jersey, 1965.Google Scholar
  18. [17.18]
    Orden, J.C.G. and Goicolea, J.M., Conserving properties in constrained dynamics of flexible multibody systems, Multibody System Dynamics, 4, 221–240, 2000.Google Scholar
  19. [17.19]
    Ambrosio, J.A.C., Geometric and material nonlinear deformations in flexible multibody systems, In Proceedings of the NATO-AR W on Computational Aspects Of Nonlinear Structural Systems With Large Rigid Body Motion, (J.A.C. Ambrosio and M. Kleiber, Eds.), Pultusk, Poland, July 2–7, 91–115, 2000.Google Scholar
  20. [17.20]
    Gim, G., Vehicle Dynamic Simulation With A Comprehensive Model For Pneumatic Tires, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 1988.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jorge A. C. Ambrosio
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto Superior TécnicoPortugal

Personalised recommendations