Topology Optimization of Discrete Structures

An Introduction in View of Computational and Nonsmooth Aspects
  • W. Achtziger
Part of the International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 374)


We discuss standard problems of topology optimization of discrete structures. This paper is an attempt to provide an (almost) self-contained introduction and stresses the techniques of reformulating problems and mathematical tools needed for a successful numerical treatment.

First, relations between several classical formulations of single load problems are shown in order to illustrate the mathematical techniques used, such as minimax-Theorems, duality etc. Numerical approaches are discussed. The outlined concept is then generalized to the multiple load case where minimization of compliance in the sense of worst case design is considered. We end up with displacement based nonsmooth optimization formulations. In the fourth section the problem of simultaneous optimization of topology and geometry is considered. We illustrate its mathematical treatment as a bilevel problem which again uses nonsmooth optimization. In each section a few numerical examples show the applicability of the proposed approaches.

Since nonsmooth analysis is non-standard in structural optimization, we close with a short introduction to important terms up to the concept of an algorithm.


Topology Optimization Nodal Point Load Case Nonsmooth Optimization Bilevel Problem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Dorn, W., Gomory, R. and Greenberg, M.: Automatic Design of Optimal Structures, J. de Mechanique, 3 (1996), 25–52.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Ringertz, U.: A Branch and Bound Algorithm for Topology Optimization of Truss Structures, Eng. Opt., 10 (1986), 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Lewinski, T., Zhou, M. and Rozvany, G.I.N.: Extended Exact Solutions for Least-Weight Truss Layouts — Part I and Part II, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 36 (1994), 375–419.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Taylor, J.E.: Truss Topology Design for Elastic/Softening Materials, in: loc. cit. [62], 451–467.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Pedersen, P.: Topology Optimization of Three-dimensional Trusses, in: loc. cit. [62], 19–30.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Topping, B.H.V.: Topology Design of Discrete Structures, in: loc. cit. [62], 517–534.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Zhou, M. and Rozvany, G.I.N.: Iterative COC methods, in: loc. cit. [63], 27–75.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Ben-Tal, A. and Bendsoe, M.P.: A New Method for Optimal Truss Topology Design, SIAM J. Opt., 3 (1993), 322–358.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Bendsoe, M.P.: Methods for Optimization of Structural Topology, Shape and Material, Springer, Berlin, New York 1995.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Kirsch, U.: Optimal Topologies of Truss Structures, Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 72 (1989), 15–28.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Kirsch, U.: Fundamental Properties of Optimal Topologies, in: loc. cit. [62], 3–18.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Rozvany, G.I.N., Bendsoe, M.P. and Kirsch, U.: Layout Optimization of Structures, Appl. Mech. Rev., Vol. 48, No. 2 (1995).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Haug, E.J. and Arora, J.S.: Applied Optimal Design, Wiley & Sons, New York 1979.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Smith, O. da Silva: Generation of 3D-Ground Structures for Truss Topology Optimization, in: loc. cit. [64], 147–152.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Bazaraa, M.S., Sherali, H.D. and Shetty, C.M.: Nonlinear Programming, 2nd Edition, Wiley & Sons, New York 1993.MATHGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Svanberg, K.: On Local and Global Minima in Structural Optimization, in: New Directions in Optimum Structural Design (Eds. A. Atrek, R.H. Gallagher, K.M. Ragsdell O.C. Zienkiewicz), Wiley & Sons, New York, 1984, 327–341.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Fleury, C.: Sequential Convex Programming for Structural Optimization Problems, in: loc. cit. [63], 531–553.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Nguyen, V.H., Strodiot, J.J. and Fleury, C.: A Mathematical Convergence Analysis of the Convex Linearization Method for Engineering Design Problems, Eng. Opt., 11 (1987), 195–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Fleury, C.: CONLIN: An Efficient Dual Optimizer Based on Convex Approximation Concepts, Struct. Opt., 1 (1989), 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Svanberg, K.: Method of Moving Asymptotes — A New Method for Structural Optimization, Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng., 24 (1987), 359–373.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Svanberg, K.: A Globally Convergent Version of MMA Without Linesearch, in: loc. cit. [64], 9–16.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Achtziger, W., Bendsoe, M., Ben-Tal, A. and Zowe, J.: Equivalent Displacement Based Formulations for Maximum Strength Truss Topology Design, Impact of Computing in Science and Engineering, 4 (1992), 315–345.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Svanberg, K.: Optimal Truss Sizing Based on Explicit Taylor Series Expansion, Struct. Opt., 2 (1990), 153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Svanberg, K.: Global Convergence of the Stress Ratio Method for Truss Sizing, Struct. Opt., 8 (1994), 60–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Taylor, J.E.: Maximum Strength Elastic Structural Design, Proc. ASCE, 95 (1969), 653–663.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Taylor, J.E. and Rossow, M.P.: Optimal Truss Design Based on an Algorithm Using Optimality Criteria, Int. J. Solids Struct., 13 (1977), 913–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Cox, H.L.: The Design of Structures for Least Weight, Pergamon Press, Oxford 1965.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Hemp, W.S.: Optimum Structures, Clarendon Press, Oxford, U.K 1973.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    Achtziger, W.: Optimierung von einfach and mehrfach belasteten Stabwerken, Bayreuther Mathematische Schriften, 46 (1993), in German.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    Oberndorfer, J.M., Achtziger, W. and Hörnlein, H.R.E.M.: Two Approaches for Truss Topology Optimization: A Comparison for Practical Use, Struct. Opt., 11 (1996), 137144.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    Sankaranaryanan, S., Haftka, R. and Kapania, R.K.: Truss Topology Optimization with Stress and Displacement Constraints, in: loc. cit. [62], 71–78.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    Cheng, G. and Jiang, Z.: Study on Topology Optimization with Stress Constraints, Eng. Opt., 20 (1992), 129–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Ringertz, U.: Newton Methods for Structural Optimization, Technical Report, No. 8819 (1988), Department of Leightweight Structures, The Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    Hörnlein, H.R.E.M.: Ein Algorithmus zur Strukturoptimierung von Fachwerkkonstruktionen, Diplomarbeit, Ludwigs-Maximilian-Universität, München, Germany 1979, in German.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    Pedersen, P.: On the Minimum Mass Layout of Trusses, Symposium on Structural Optimization, AGARD-CP-36–70 (1970), AGARD Conf. Proc.Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    Smith, O. da Silva: Topology Optimization of Trusses with Local Stability Constraints and Multiple Loading Conditions, Technical Report, No. 517 (1996), Danish Center for Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (DCAMM), Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    Achtziger, W.: Truss Topology Optimization Including Bar Properties Different for Tension and Compression, Struct. Opt., 12 (1996), 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    Petersson, J. and Klarbring, A.: Saddle Point Approach to Stiffness Optimization of Discrete Structures Including Unilateral Contact, Control and Cybernetics, 3 (1994), 461–479.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    Klarbring, A., Petersson, J. and Rönnquist, M.: Truss Topology Optimization Involving Unilateral Contact, J. Opt. Theory Appl., 87 (1) (1995).Google Scholar
  40. [40]
    Koevara, M., Zibulevsky, M. and Zowe, J.: Mechanical Design Problems with Unilateral Contact, Technical Report, No. 190 (1996), Institute of Applied Mathematics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany, submitted.Google Scholar
  41. [41]
    Wilkinson, J.H.: The Algebraic Eigenvalue Problem, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1965.MATHGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    Rockafellar, R.T.: Convex Analysis, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. 1970.Google Scholar
  43. [43]
    Achtziger, W.: Multiple Load Truss Topology and Sizing Optimization: Some Properties of Minimax Compliance, Technical Report 1994–41 (1994), Institute of Mathematics, The Technical University of Denmark, submitted.Google Scholar
  44. [44]
    Jarre, F., Koevara, M. and Zowe, J.: Interior Point Methods for Mechanical Design Problems, Technical Report, No. 173 (1996), Institute of Applied Mathematics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany, submitted.Google Scholar
  45. [45]
    Zibulevsky, M. and Ben-Tal, A.: On a New Class of Augmented Lagrangian Methods for Large Scale Convex Programming Problems, Technical Report, 2/93 (1993), Opt. Lab., Technion (Israel Inst. of Technology ), Haifa, Israel.Google Scholar
  46. [46]
    Ben-Tal, A. and Nemirovskii, A.: Potential Reduction Polynomial Time Method for Truss Topology Design, SIAM J. Opt., 4 (1994), 596–612.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. [47]
    Ben-Tal, A. and Roth, G.: A Truncated log Barrier Algorithm for Large-Scale Convex Programming and Minmax Problems: Implementation and Computational Results, Optim. Meth. Software, 6 (1996), 283–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. [48]
    Murty, K.G.: Linear Programming, Wiley & Sons, New York 1983.Google Scholar
  49. [49]
    Levy, R.: Fixed Point Theory and Structural Optimization, Eng. Opt., 17 (1991), 251–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. [50]
    Maxwell, J.C.: On Reciprocal Figures, Frames and Diagrams of Forces, Scientific Papers, 2 (1890), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K., 175–177.Google Scholar
  51. [51]
    Michell, A.G.M.: The Limits of Economy of Material in Frame Structures, Philosophical Magazine, Series 6, Vol. 8 (1904), 589–597.Google Scholar
  52. [52]
    Achtziger, W.: Minimax Compliance Truss Topology Subject to Multiple Loadings, in: loc. cit. [62], 43–54.Google Scholar
  53. [53]
    Achtziger, W.: Multiple Load Truss Optimization: Properties of Minimax Compliance and Two Nonsmooth Approaches, in: loc. cit. [64], 123–128.Google Scholar
  54. [54]
    Gauvin, J. and Dubeau, F.: Differential Properties of the Marginal Function in Mathematical Programming, Math. Prog. Study, 19 (1982), 101–119.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. [55]
    Schramm, H. and Zowe, J.: A Version of the Bundle Idea for Minimizing a Nonsmooth Function: Conceptual Idea, Convergence Analysis, Numerical Results, SIAM J. Opt., Vol. 2 (1992), 121–152.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  56. [56]
    Ben-Tal, A., Kocvara, M. and Zowe, J.: Two Nonsmooth Methods for Simultaneous Geometry and Topology Design of Trusses, in: loc. cit. [62], 31–42.Google Scholar
  57. [57]
    Kocvara, M. and Zowe, J.: How To Optimize Mechanical Structures Simultaneously with Respect to Topology and Geometry, in: loc. cit. [64], 135–140.Google Scholar
  58. [58]
    Kocvara, M. and Zowe, J.: How Mathematics Can Help in Design of Mechanical Structures, in: Numerical Analysis (Eds. D. Griffiths and G. Watson), Longman Scientific and Technical, 1996, 76–93.Google Scholar
  59. [59]
    Clarke, F.H.: Optimization and Nonsmooth Analysis, Wiley & Sons, New York 1983.Google Scholar
  60. [60]
    Zowe, J.: Nondifferentiable Optimization, in: Computational Mathematical Programming (Ed. K. Schittkowski ), Springer, Berlin, 1985, 323–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. [61]
    Lemaréchal, C.: Nondifferentiable Optimization, in: Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science (Eds. G.L. Nemhauser, A.H.G. Rinnooy Kan and M.J. Todd), Vol. 1, Elsevier Science Publishers, North-Holland, 1989, 529–572.Google Scholar
  62. [62]
    Bendsoe, M.P. and Mota Soares, C.A. (Eds.): Topology Optimization of Structures, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 1993.Google Scholar
  63. [63]
    Rozvany, G.I.N. (Ed.): Optimization of Large Structural Systems, NATO ASI Series, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands 1993.Google Scholar
  64. [64]
    Olhoff, N. and Rozvany, G.I.N. (Eds.): WCSMO-1, First World Congress of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Pergamon, Elsevier, Oxford, U.K. 1995.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Achtziger
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Erlangen-NurembergErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations