Advertisement

Shakedown, Limit, Inadaptation and Post-Yield Analysis

  • Andrzej Siemaszko
Part of the International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 432)

Abstract

An inelastic structure subjected to variable repeated loading may work either in elastic, shakedown (adaptation), inadaptation or limit regime. For the given load variation domain the safety factors against first yielding, inadaptation and limit state can be defined by the shakedown and limit analysis. The classical shakedown and limit analysis can be extended to account for nonlinear geometrical effects as well as material hardening. In this chapter the kinematic approach is described. An uniform formulation of shakedown, limit, inadaptation and post-yield analyses of discrete elastic-plastic structures is presented. Classical limit and shakedown problems are formulated as linear programs, whereas the post-yield and inadaptation as sequences of linear programs. Nonlinear geometric effects, nonlinear strain-hardening as well as material damage may be accounted for.

Keywords

Material Hardening Plastic Multiplier Story Frame Inelastic Structure Shakedown Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bielawski, G., Siemaszko, A. and Zwolinski, J., (1997). An adaptation and limit analysis method in the design of inelastic structures. Trans. SMiRT, 14, 3, FW/4, 293–300.Google Scholar
  2. Duszek, M. and Sawczuk, A. (1976). Stable and unstable states of rigid-plastic frames at the yield point load. J. Struct. Mech. 4: 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gross-Weege, J. (1990). A unified formulation of statical shakedown criteria for geometrically nonlinear problem. Int.J. Plast. 6: 433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Lodygowski, T. (1982). Geometrically nonlinear analysis of rigid plastic beams and plane frames. IFTR Reports, 9 (in Polish).Google Scholar
  5. Maier, G. (1970). A matrix structural theory of piecewise linear elastoplasticity with interacting yield planes. Meccanica 5: 54–66.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Maier, G. (1973). A shakedown matrix theory allowing for work-hardening and second-order geometric effects. A.Sawczuk, ed., Foundations of Plasticity. Noordhoff, Leyden, 417.Google Scholar
  7. Perzyna, P., (1984). Constitutive modeling of dissipative solids for postcritical behaviour and fracture. J.Eng.Mat.Techn., ASME 106: 410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Saczuk, J. and Stumpf, H. (1990). On statical shakedown theorems for nonlinear problems. Inst.Mech., Ruhr-Universität, Bochum, 47, 1.Google Scholar
  9. Siemaszko, A. and König, J.A. (1985). Analysis of stability of incremental collapse of skeletal structures. J. Struct. Mech. 13: 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Siemaszko, A. (1988). Stability analysis of shakedown processes of plane skeletal structures. IFTR Reports 12: 1–176 (in Polish).Google Scholar
  11. Siemaszko, A. (1993). Inadaptation analysis with hardening and damage. Eur.J.Mech., A/Solids 12: 237–248.MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Siemaszko, A. (1995). Limit, post-yield, shakedown and inadaptation analysis of inelastic discrete structures. In Z. Mróz, D. Weichert, S. Dorosz, eds. Inelastic Behaviour of Structures under Variable Loads. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Weichert, D., (1986). On the influence of geometrical nonlinearities on the shakedown of elastic-plastic structures. Int. J. Plast. 2: 135.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrzej Siemaszko
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Fundamental Technological ResearchWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations