Romansy 14 pp 189-199 | Cite as

Integration of Torque Controlled Arm with Velocity Controlled Base for Mobile Manipulation

  • Denny Oetomo
  • Marcelo H. AngJr.
  • Rodrigo Jamisola
  • Oussama Khatib
Part of the International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 438)


A mobile manipulation system often involves combining more than one robot together, typically a manipulator arm and a mobile base. To implement force and motion control with dynamic compensation, a torque-controlled system is necessary. However, a torque-controlled robot is not always available. In fact, most commercially available mobile bases are velocity-controlled. This paper presents a method for combining a torque-controlled arm and a velocity-controlled base, while performing a force and motion task. The operational space formulation using a consistent set of integrated arm-base robot dynamics is employed in a mobile manipulation task of polishing an aircraft canopy. The torque controlled arm compensates for the dynamics introduced by the mobile base. The added mobility of the base enables the arm to cover the entire workspace.


Force Control Null Space Mobile Manipulator Torque Control Base Motion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Angeles, J., Habib, M., and Lopez-Cajûn, C. (1988). Efficient algorithms for the kinematic inversion of redundant robot manipulators. The International Journal of Robotics and Automation 3 (1): 106–116.Google Scholar
  2. Chang, K., and Khatib, O. (1995). Manipulator control at kinematic singularities: A dynamically consistent strategy. Proc. IEEE/RSIInt. Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 3: 84–88.Google Scholar
  3. Grabits, G. A. (1986). Polishing aerospace transparencies. Conference on Robotic Solutions in Aerospace Manufacturing MS86–203 1–22. Orlando, Florida.Google Scholar
  4. Holmberg, R., and Khatib, O. (2000). Development and control of a holonomic mobile robot for mobile manipulation tasks. International Journal of Robotics Research 19 (11): 1066–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hsu, P., Hauser, J., and Sastry, S. (1988). Dynamic control of redundant manipulators. IEEE Intl. Conf. Robotics and Automation 1: 183–187.Google Scholar
  6. Jamisola, R., Lim, T. M., Oetomo, D., Ang, M., Khatib, O., and Lim, S. Y. (2002). The operational space formulation implementation to aircraft canopy polishing using a mobile manipulator. Accepted to the Proc. of Intl. Conf. Robotics and Automation, May 2002.Google Scholar
  7. Khatib, O., Yokoi, K., Brock, O., Chang, K., and A.Casal. (1999). Robots in human environments: Basic autonomous capabilities. The International Journal of Robotics Research 18 (7): 684–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Khatib, O. (1987). A unified approach for motion and force control of robot manipulators: The operational space formulation. IEEE J Robotics and Automation RA-3(1):43–53.Google Scholar
  9. Klein, C., and Huang, C. (1983). Review of pseudoinverse control for use with kinematically redundant manipulators. IEEE Trans. Sys., Man., Cyber. SMC-13(3): 245–250.Google Scholar
  10. Nakamura, Y., and Hanafusa, H. (1987). Optimal redundancy control of robot manipulators. International Journal of Robotics Research 6 (1): 32–42.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Whitney, D. (1969). Resolved motion rate control of manipulators and human prostheses. IEEE Trans. Man-Machine Sys. MMS-10(2): 47–53.Google Scholar
  12. Yoshikawa, T. (1984). Analysis and control of robot manipulators with redundancy. In Brady, M., and Paul, R., eds., Robotics Research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 735–747.Google Scholar
  13. Yoshikawa, T. (1985). Manipulability of robotic mechanisms. Intl. J. Robotics Research 4 (2): 3–9.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Denny Oetomo
    • 1
  • Marcelo H. AngJr.
    • 1
  • Rodrigo Jamisola
    • 2
  • Oussama Khatib
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational University of SingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Department of Electrical EngineeringColorado State UniversityUSA
  3. 3.Computer Science DepartmentStanford UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations