Advertisement

Abstract

This chapter presents applications of the boundary contour method (BCM) in three dimensional (3-D) linear elasticity. Following a brief introduction, BCM and hypersingular BCM (HBCM) formulations, for this class of problems, are presented in Section 2. This is followed by sections describing shape sensitivity analysis, shape optimization and error analysis and adaptivity with the BCM. Numerical results for selected examples are included throughout the chapter.

Keywords

Boundary Element Boundary Element Method Hollow Sphere Linear Elasticity Boundary Integral Equation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [GrayP97b]
    Gray, L.J., and Paulino, G.H. (1997). Symmetric Galerkin boundary integral fracture analysis for plane orthotropic elasticity. Computational Mechanics 20: 26–33.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [Bonn95]
    Bonnet, M. (1995). Regularized direct and indirect symmetric variational BIE formulations for three-dimensional elasticity. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 15: 93102.Google Scholar
  3. [ChanM97]
    Chandra, A., and Mukherjee, S. (1997). Boundary Element Methods in Manufacturing New York:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. [ChatM99]
    Chati, M.K., and Mukherjee, S. (1999). Evaluation of gradients on the boundary using fully regularized hypersingular boundary integral equations. Acta Mechanica 135: 4145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [ChatMPOla]
    Chati, M.K., Mukherjee, S., and Paulino, G.H. (2001). The meshless hypersingular boundary node method for three-dimensional potential theory and linear elasticity problems. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 25: 639–653.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [ChatPM01b]
    Chati, M.K., Paulino, G.H., and Mukherjee, S. (2001). The meshless standard and hypersingular boundary node methods–applications to error estimation and adaptivity in three-dimensional problems. International Journal for Numerical methods in Engineering 50: 2233–2269.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. [ChenH99]
    Chen, J.T., and Hong, H-K. (1999). Review of dual boundary element methods with emphasis on hypersingular integrals and divergent series. ASME Applied Mechanics Reviews 52: 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [ChoiK88]
    Choi, J.H., and Kwak, B.M. (1988). Boundary integral equation method for shape optimization of elastic structures. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 26: 1579–1595.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. [Crus69]
    Cruse, T.A. (1969). Numerical solutions in three-dimensional elastostatics. International Journal of Solids and Structures 5: 1259–1274.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [CrusR96]
    Cruse, T.A., and Richardson, J.D. (1996). Non-singular Somigliana stress identities in elasticity. International Journal for Numerical methods in Engineering 39: 3273–3304.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. [GrayMI90]
    Gray, L.J., Martha, L.F., and Ingraffea A.R. (1990). Hypersingular integrals in boundary element fracture analysis. International Journal for Numerical methods in Engineering 29: 1135–1158.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. [GrayBK95]
    Gray, L.J., Balakrishna, C., and Kane, J.H. (1995). Symmetric Galerkin fracture analysis. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 15: 103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [GrayP97a]
    Gray, L.J., and Paulino, G.H. (1997). Symmetric Galerkin boundary integral formulation for interface and multizone problems. International Journal for Numerical methods in Engineering 40: 3085–3101.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. [GrayP98]
    Gray, L.J., and Paulino, G.H. (1998). Crack tip interpolation revisited. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics 58: 428–455.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. [Guig94]
    Guiggiani, M. (1994). Hypersingular formulation for boundary stress evaluation. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 13: 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [HaugCK86]
    Haug, E.J., Choi, K.K., and Komkov, V. (1986). Design Sensitivity Analysis of Structural Systems. New York: Academic Press.MATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [KrisSRR90]
    Krishnasamy, G., Schmerr, L.W., Rudolphi, T.J., and Rizzo, F.J. (1990). Hypersingular boundary integral equations: some applications in acoustic and elastic wave scattering. ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics 57: 404–414.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. [KrisRR92]
    Krishnasamy, G., Rizzo, F.J. and Rudolphi, T.J. (1992). Hypersingular boundary integral equations: their occurrence, interpretation, regularization and computation. In Banerjee, P.K., and Kobayashi, S., eds., Developments in Boundary Element Methods-7, Elsevier Applied Science: London. 207–252.Google Scholar
  19. [Lutz91]
    Lutz, E.D. (1991). Numerical Methods for Hypersingular and Near-singular Boundary Integrals in Fracture Mechanics. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  20. [LutzIG92]
    Lutz, E.D., Ingraffea, A.R., and Gray, L.J. (1992). Use of `simple solutions’ for boundary integral methods in elasticity and fracture analysis. International Journal for Numerical methods in Engineering 35: 1737–1751.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. [MartR96]
    Martin, P.A., and Rizzo, F.J. (1996). Hypersingular integrals: how smooth must the density be ? International Journal for Numerical methods in Engineering 39: 687–704.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. [MartRC98]
    Martin, P.A., Rizzo, F.J., and Cruse, T.A. (1998). Smoothness-relaxation strategies for singular and hypersingular integral equations. International Journal for Numerical methods in Engineering 42: 885–906.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. [Meno96]
    Menon, G. (1996). Hypersingular error estimates in boundary element methods. M.S. Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  24. [MenoPM99]
    Menon, G., Paulino, G.H., and Mukherjee, S. (1999). Analysis of hypersingular residual error estimates in boundary element methods for potential problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 173: 449–473.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. [Mukh1982]
    Mukherjee, S. (1982). Boundary Element Methods in Crep and Fracture. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  26. [Mukh a]
    Mukherjee, S. (2000). CPV and HFP integrals and their applications in the boundary element method. International Journal of Solids and Structures 37: 6623–6634.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. [Mukh b]
    Mukherjee, S. (2000). Finite parts of singular and hypersingular integrals with ir- regular boundary source points. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 24: 767–776.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. [Mukh0l]
    Mukherjee, S. (2001). On boundary integral equations for cracked and for thin bodies. Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids 6: 47–64.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. [MukhMSN97]
    Mukherjee, Y.X., Mukherjee, S., Shi, X., and Nagarajan, A. (1997). The boundary contour method for three-dimensional linear elasticity with a new quadratic boundary element. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 20: 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [MukhM98]
    Mukherjee, S., and Mukherjee, Y. X. (1998). The hypersingular boundary contour method for three-dimensional linear elasticity. ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics 65: 300309.Google Scholar
  31. [MukhSM99]
    Mukherjee, S., Shi, X., and Mukherjee, Y.X. (1999). Surface variables and their sensitivities in three-dimensional linear elasticity by the boundary contour method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 173: 387–402.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. [MukhSM00]
    Mukherjee, S., Shi, X., and Mukherjee, Y.X. (2000). Internal variables and their sensitivities in three-dimensional linear elasticity by the boundary contour method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 187: 289–306.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. [MukhM01]
    Mukherjee, Y.X., and Mukherjee, S. (2001). Error analysis and adaptivity in three-dimensional linear elasticity by the usual and hypersingular boundary contour method. International Journal of Solids and Structures 38: 161–178.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. [NagaLM94]
    Nagarajan, A., Lutz, E.D., and Mukherjee, S. (1994). A novel boundary element method for linear elasticity with no numerical integration for 2-D and line integrals for 3-D problems. ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics 61: 264–269.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  35. [NagaML96]
    Nagarajan, A., Mukherjee, S., and Lutz, E.D. (1996). The boundary contour method for three-dimensional linear elasticity. ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics 63: 278286.Google Scholar
  36. [NovaS99]
    Novati, G., and Springhetti, R. (1999). A Galerkin boundary contour method for two-dimensional linear elasticity. Computational Mechanics 23: 53–62.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. [Pau195]
    Paulino, G.H. (1995). Novel formulations of the boundary element method for fracture mechanics and error estimation. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  38. [PaulGZ96]
    Paulino, G.H., Gray, L.J., and Zarkian, V. (1996). Hypersingular residuals–a new approach for error estimation in the boundary element method. International Journal for Numerical methods in Engineering 39: 2005–2029.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  39. [PaulG99]
    Paulino, G.H., and Gray, L.J. (1999). Galerkin residuals for adaptive symmetricGalerkin boundary element methods. ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics 125: 575–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [PaulMM01]
    Paulino, G.H., Menon, G., and Mukherjee S. (2001). Error estimation using hypersingular integrals in boundary element methods for linear elasticity. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements Manuscript in print.Google Scholar
  41. [PhanMM97]
    Phan, A-V., Mukherjee, S., and Mayer J.R.R. (1997). The boundary contour method for two-dimensional linear elasticity with quadratic boundary elements. Computational Mechanics 20: 310–319.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  42. [PhanMM98a]
    Phan, A-V., Mukherjee, S., and Mayer J.R.R. (1998). A boundary contour formulation for design sensitivity analysis in two-dimensional linear elasticity. International Journal of Solids and Structures 35: 1981–1999.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. [PhanMM98b]
    Phan, A-V., Mukherjee, S., and Mayer J.R.R. (1998). The hypersingular bound- ary contour method for two-dimensional linear elasticity. Acta Mechanica 130: 209–225.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. [PhanMM98c]
    Phan, A-V., Mukherjee, S., and Mayer J.R.R. (1998). Stresses, stress sensitivities and shape optimization in two-dimensional linear elasticity by the boundary contour method. International Journal for Numerical methods in Engineering 42: 1391–1407.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  45. [PhanM99]
    Phan, A-V., and Mukherjee, S. (1999). On design sensitivity analysis in linear elasticity by the boundary contour method. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 23: 195199.Google Scholar
  46. [Pick44]
    Pickett, G. (1944). Application of the Fourier method to the solution of certain boundary value problems in the theory of elasticity. ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics 66:A176- A182.Google Scholar
  47. [Rizzo67]
    Rizzo, F.J. (1967). An integral equation approach to boundary value problems of classical elastostatics Quarterly of Applied Mathematics 25: 83–95.MATHGoogle Scholar
  48. [SandW88]
    Sandgren, E., and Wu, S.J. (1988). Shape optimization using the boundary element method with substructuring. International Journal for Numerical methods in Engineering 26: 1913–1924.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  49. [SaigK90]
    Saigal S., and Kane, J.H. (1990). Boundary-element shape optimization system for aircraft structural components. AIM Journal 28: 1203–1204.Google Scholar
  50. [Schi86]
    Schittkowski, K. (1986). NLPQL: a FORTRAN subroutine solving constrained nonlinear programming problems. Annals of Operations Research 5: 485–500.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  51. [ShiM99]
    Shi, X., and Mukherjee, S. (1999). Shape optimization in three-dimensional linear elasticity by the boundary contour method. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 23: 627–637.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  52. [TafF95]
    Tafreshi, A., and Fenner, R.T. (1995). General-purpose computer program for shape optimization of engineering structures using the boundary element method. Computers and Structures 56: 713–720.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  53. [TanaSS94]
    Tanaka, M., Sladek, V., and Sladek, J. (1994). Regularization techniques applied to boundary element methods. ASME Applied Mechanics Reviews 47: 457–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. [TohM94]
    Toh, K-C., and Mukherjee, S. (1994). Hypersingular and finite part integrals in the boundary element method. International Journal of Solids and Structures 31: 2299–2312.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  55. [TimoG70]
    Timoshenko, S.P., and Goodier, J.N. (1970) Theory of Elasticity, 3rd. ed. New York: McGraw Hill.MATHGoogle Scholar
  56. [WeiCLM94]
    Wei, X., Chandra, A., Leu, L.J., and Mukherjee, S. (1994). Shape optimization in elasticity and elasto-viscoplasticity by the boundary element method. International Journal of Solids and Structures 31: 533–550.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  57. [WildA98]
    Wilde, A.J., and Aliabadi, M.H. (1998). Direct evaluation of boundary stresses in the 3D BEM of elastostatics. Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering 14: 505–517.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  58. [YamaSK94]
    Yamazaki, K., Sakamoto, J., and Kitano, M. (1994). Three-dimensional shape optimization using the boundary element method. AIM Journal 32: 1295–1301.MATHGoogle Scholar
  59. [Yang90]
    Yang, R.J. (1990). Component shape optimization using BEM. Computers and Structures 37: 561–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. [Zhao91]
    Zhao, Z. (1991). Shape design sensitivity analysis and optimization using the boundary element method. New York: Springer.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  61. [ZhaoL99]
    Zhao, Z.Y., and Lan, S.R. (1999). Boundary stress calculation–a comparison study. Computers and Structures 71: 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. [ZhouCS99]
    Zhou, S., Cao, Z., and Sun, S. (1999). The traction boundary contour method for linear elasticity. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 46: 1883–1895.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Subrata Mukherjee
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Kimball HallCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations