Experimental Methods for Rubberlike Solids

  • Paul Buckley
Part of the International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 452)


Rubberlike solids are typified by a highly elastic response to stress, combined with a low Young’s modulus typically of order 1 MPa. They are amorphous polymers, crosslinked (chemically or physically) and at temperatures above their glass transition. Filler particles are often present. In experimental studies, length scales and time scales are usually chosen to ensure the measured response is that of a homogeneously deforming continuum, and protocols recognize the possibility of stress-induced structural changes. To characterise the response in three dimensions, experiments are conducted with various strain-states. These can be achieved with a variety of experimental configurations, including purpose-built biaxial testing machines. Each experiment explores a path in principal stretch space. Since rubberlike solids show some deviation from ideal elasticity, it is also necessary to characterise the dependence of their response on the time-sequence of strain or stress. For small strains the response is then linear viscoelastic, giving creep, stress relaxation and hysteresis effects, related through the linear theory. At larger strains, and especially in the presence of reinforcing fillers, characteristic deviations from linearity are observed — the well-known Payne and Mullins effects, for which stress-induced structural breakdown is at least partially responsible. Experiments are also used to validate numerical models for prediction of non-uniform deformations. It is advantageous to employ simple geometries, preferably where there is a known analytical solution to provide a benchmark.


Constitutive Model Stress Relaxation Natural Rubber Strain Energy Function Nominal Strain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arridge, R.G.C. (1974). A new method for measurement of bulk modulus of solid polymers. Journal of Physics E: Scientific Instruments 7: 399–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergstrom, J.S. and Boyce, M.C. (1998). Constitutive modelling of the large strain time-dependent behaviour of elastomers. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 46: 931–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergstrom, J.S. and Boyce, M.C. (2000). Large strain time-dependent behaviour of filled elastomers. Mechanics of Materials 32: 627–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, R.P. (1996). Physical Testing of Rubber. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buckley, C.P. and Turner, D.M. (1999). Application of flexible biaxial testing in the development of constitutive models for elastomers. In A. Dorfmann and A. H. Muhr, eds., Constitutive Models for Rubber. Rotterdam: A.A.Balkema. 59–64.Google Scholar
  6. Chazeau, L., Brown, J.D., Yanyo, L.C. and Sternstein, S.S. (2000). Modulus recovery kinetics and other insights into the Payne effect for filled elastomers. Polymer Composites 21: 202–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coveney, V.A., Jamil, S., Johnson, D.E., Keavey, M.A. and Menger, C. (1999). Implementation in FEA of a triboelastic law for dynamic behaviour of filled elastomers. In D. Boast and V. A. Coveney, eds., Finite Element Analysis ofElastomers. London: Professional Engineering Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Coveney, V.A., Johnson, D.E. and Turner, D.M. (1995). A triboelastic model for the cyclic mechanical behaviour of filled vulcanizates. Rubber Chemistry and Technology 68: 660–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feng, W.W. (1992). Transactions of the ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics 59: S29 - S34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ferry, J.D. (1980). Viscoelastic properties of polymers. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  11. Gerlach, C., (1998). Sequential biaxial drawing of polyester film. DPhil, Oxford University.Google Scholar
  12. Gough, J., Gregory, I.H. and Muhr, A.H. (1999). Determination of constitutive equations for vulcanized rubber. In D. Boast and V. A. Coveney, eds., Finite Element Analysis ofElastomers. London: Professional Engineering Publishing. 5–26.Google Scholar
  13. Haupt, P. (2002). Continuum Mechanics and Theory of Materials. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Holzapfel, G.A. (2000). Nonlinear Solid Mechanics. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. James, A.G. and Green, A. (1975). Strain energy functions of rubber. II. The characterisation of filled vulcanizates. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 19: 2319–2330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. James, A.G., Green, A. and Simpson, G.M. (1975). Strain energy functions of rubber. I. Characterisation of gum vulcanizates. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 19: 2033–2058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johannknecht, R. and Jerrams, S.J. (1999). The need for equi-biaxial testing to determine elastomeric material properties. In A. Dorfmann and A. H. Muhr, eds., Constitutive models for rubber. Rotterdam: A.A.Balkema. 73–76.Google Scholar
  18. Jones, D.F. and Treloar, L.R.G. (1975). The properties of rubber in pure homogeneous strain. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 8: 1285–1304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kramer, O., Hvidt, S. and Ferry, J.D. (1994). Dynamic Mechanical Properties. In J. E. Mark, B. Erman and F. R. Eirich, eds., Science and Technology of Rubber. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Lindley, P.B. (1964). Engineering Design with Natural Rubber. Brickendonbury: Malaysian Rubber Producers’ Research Association.Google Scholar
  21. Lindley, P.B. (1971). Plane-stress analysis of rubber at high strains using finite elements. Journal of Strain Analysis 6: 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McCrum, N.G. (1984). The determination of dlnr2/dT by the the method of temperature induced creep. Polymer Communications 25: 213–217.Google Scholar
  23. McCrum, N.G., Buckley, C.P. and Bucknall, C.B. (1997). Principles of Polymer Engineering. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Medalia, A.I. and Krauss, G. (1994). Reinforcement of elastomers by particulate fillers. In J. E. Mark, B. Erman and F. R. Eirich, eds., Science and Technology of Rubber. 2, San Diego: Academic Press. 387–418.Google Scholar
  25. Muhr, A.H., Gough, J. and Gregory, I.H. (1999). Experimental determination of model for liquid silicone rubber: hyperelasticity and Mullins’ effect. In A. Doifinann and A. H. Muhr, eds., Constitutive Models for Rubber. Rotterdam: A.A.Balkema.Google Scholar
  26. Mullins, L. (1959). Determination of degree of crosslinking in natural rubber vulcanizates. Part IV. Stress-strain behaviour at large extensions. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2: 257–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Obata, Y., Kawabata, H. and Kawai, H. (1970). Mechanical properties of natural rubber vulcanizates in finite deformation. Journal of Polymer Science: Part A-2 8: 903–919.Google Scholar
  28. Oertel, G., Ed. (1994). Polyurethane Handbook. Munich, Carl Hanser Verlag.Google Scholar
  29. Ogden, R.W. (1972). Large deformation isotropic elasticity–on the correlation of theory and experiment for incompressible rubberlike solids. Proceedings of the Royal Society A 326: 565–584.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Payne, A.R. (1962). The dynamic properties of carbon black-loaded natural rubber vulcanizates. Part I. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 6: 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Payne, A.R. (1963). Dynamic properties of heat-treated butyl vulcanizates. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 7: 873–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Penn, R.W. (1970). Volume changes accompanying the extension of rubber. Transactions of the Society of Rheology 14: 590–617.Google Scholar
  33. Rivlin, R.S. and Saunders, D.W. (1951). Large elastic deformations of isotropic materials. VII Experiments on the deformation of rubber. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A243: 251–288.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Rivlin, R.S. and Thomas, A.G. (1951). Large elastic deformation of isotropic materials VIII. Strain distribution around a hole in a sheet. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 243: 289–298.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shen, M. (1969). Internal energy contribution to the elasticity of natural rubber. Macromolecules 2: 358–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Timoshenko, S. and Goodier, J.N. (1951). Theory of Elasticity. New York: McGraw-Hill. Treloar, L.R.G. (1958). The Physics of Rubber Elasticity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. Treloar, L.R.G. and Riding, G. (1979). A non-Gaussian theory for rubber in biaxial strain. Proceedings of the Royal Society A 369: 261–280.Google Scholar
  38. Tschoegl, N.W. (1989). The Phenomenological Theory of Linear Viscoelastic Behaviour. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vangerko, H. and Treloar, L.R.G. (1978). The inflation and extension of rubber tube for biaxial strain studies. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 11: 1969–1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Buckley
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Engineering ScienceUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations