Fuzzy Decision Theory Intelligent Ways for Solving Real-World Decision Problems and for Solving Information Costs

  • Heinrich J. Rommelfanger
Part of the International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 472)


Looking at modern theories in management science and business administration, one recognizes that many of these conceptions are based on decision theory in the sense of von Neumann and Morgenstern. However, empirical surveys reveal that the normative decision theory is hardly used in practice to solve real-life problems. This neglect of recognized classical decision concepts may be caused by the fact that the information necessary for modeling a real decision problem is not available, or the cost for getting this information seems too high. Subsequently, decision makers (DM’s) abstain from constructing decision models.

As the fuzzy set theory offers the possibility to model vague data as precise as a person can describes them, a lot of decision models with fuzzy components are proposed in literature since 1965. But in my opinion only fuzzy consequences and fuzzy probabilities are important for practical applications. Therefore, this paper is restricted to these subjects. It is shown that the decision models with fuzzy utilities or/and fuzzy probabilities are suitable for getting realistic models of real world decision situations. Moreover, we propose appropriate instruments for selecting the best alternative and for compiling a ranking of the alternatives. As fuzzy sets are not well ordered, this should be done in form of an interactive solution process, where additional information is gathered in correspondence with the requirements and under consideration of cost—benefit relations. This procedure leads to a reduction of information costs.


Decision Maker Membership Function Fuzzy Number Decision Model Decision Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bortolan, G., and Degani, R. (1985). Ranking fuzzy subsets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 15: 1–19.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen S.J. and Hwang Ch.-L. (1987). Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making, Methods and Applications. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  3. Dubois, D., and Prade, H. (1982). The Use of Fuzzy Numbers in Decision Analysis. In ( Gupta, M.M. and Sanchez, E. Hrsg.), Fuzzy Information and Decision Processes. Amsterdam New York Oxford, 309–321.Google Scholar
  4. Dubois, D. and Prade, H. (1983). Ranking of Fuzzy Numbers in the Setting of Possibility Theory. Information Sciences 30: 183–224.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Dubois, D,. and Prade, H. (1998). Possibilistic logic in decision, In Proceedings of EFDAN’98. 41–49Google Scholar
  6. Fandel, G., Francois, P., and Gulatz, K.M: (1994). PPS-Systeme: Grundlagen, Methoden, Software, Marktanalyse. HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  7. Jain, R. (1976). Decision making in the presence of variables. IEEE, Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 6: 698–703.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Kivijärvi, H., Korhonen, P., and Wallenius, J. (1986). Operations research and its practice in Finland. Interfaces 16: 53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lai, Y.-J., and Hwang, C.-L. (1992). Fuzzy mathematical programming. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Lilien, G. (1987). MS/OR: A mid-life crises. Interfaces 17: 53–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Menges, G., and Kofler, E. (1976). Entscheidungen bei unvollständiger Information. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Meyer zu Selhausen H. (1989). Repositioning OR’s Products in the Market. Interfaces 19, 79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Neumann, J.v., and Morgenstern, O. (1953). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton.Google Scholar
  14. Ramik, J. und Rimanek, J. (1985). Inequality between Fuzzy Numbers and its Use in Fuzzy Optimization. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 16: 123–138.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Rommelfanger, H. (1984). Entscheidungsmodelle mit Fuzzy-Nutzen. In Operations Research Proceedings 1983, 559–567Google Scholar
  16. Rommelfanger H. (1986). Rangordnungsverfahren für unscharfe Mengen. OR-Spektrum 8: 219–228CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Rommelfanger H. (1994). Fuzzy Decision Support-Systeme — Entscheiden bei Unschärfe. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2nd edition.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rommelfanger, H., and Eickemeier, S. (2002). Entscheidungstheorie. Klassische Konzepte und Fuzzy-Erweiterungen. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Slowinski, R. (Ed.) (1998). Fuzzy Sets in Decision Analysis, Operations Research and Statistics. Boston: Kluwer.MATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Sommer, G. (1980). Bayes-Entscheidungen mit unscharfer Problembeschreibung. Frankfurt am Main: Peter LangGoogle Scholar
  21. Tanaka H., Okuda T., and Asai K. (1976). A Formulation of Fuzzy Decision Problems and its Application to an Investment Problem. Kybernetes 5: 25–30.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Tanaka, H., and Asai, K. (1984). Fuzzy Linear Programming with Fuzzy Numbers. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 13: 1–10.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Tanaka, H., Ichihashi, H., and Asai, K. (1984). A Formulation of Linear Programming Problems based on Comparison of Fuzzy Numbers. Control and Cybernetics 13: 185–194.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Tingley, G.A. (1987). Can MS/OR sell itself well enough? Interfaces 17: 41–52.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Watson, S.R., Weiss, J.J., and Donell, M.L. (1979). Fuzzy Decision Analysis. IEEE, Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 9: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Whalen, T. (1984). Decision Making under Uncertainty with various Assumptions about available Information. IEEE, Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 14: 888–900.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yager, R.R. (1979). Possibilistic Decision Making. IEEE, Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 9:Google Scholar
  28. Zadeh L.A. (1965). Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control 8: 338–353MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Zimmermann H.J. (1996). Fuzzy Sets Theory and its Applications. Boston: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heinrich J. Rommelfanger
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Statistics and MathematicsGoethe-University Frankfurt am MainGermany

Personalised recommendations