Advertisement

Unipolar Injection: EHD Enhanced Space Charge Limited Conduction in Liquid Dielectrics

  • Antonio Castellanos
Conference paper
Part of the International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 380)

Abstract

Electrohydrodynamic processes can play a major role in ionic transport phenomena in liquids. Effects of this type were first studied by Avsec and Luntz [1] and later by Steutzer [2] who was interested in developing a dielectric pump. Ostroumov [3] seems to have been the first to analyze conduction processes in ionic liquids in the light of convective effects. Evidence of convective instabilities can be seen in the work of Watson, Schneider and Till [4] on electron-beam charged liquids; in these studies an electron beam was used to inject charge into the free surface of a thin film of liquid and the surface potential of the sample was measured as a function of the injected current. The results indicate that for sufficiently high current densities the liquid becomes EHD unstable and convection-enhanced conduction occurs. These experiments will be discussed below. Felici, Atten and their co-workers at CNRS, Grenoble [5–7] have investigated EHD phenomena over the past 30 years or so, and they have made extensive use of ion-exchange membranes as injecting electrodes into polar dielectrics such as nitrobenzene. By means of the Kerr electroptical effect they have been able to observe field distortion due to the charge injection process and to keep track of the resulting EHD effects.

Keywords

Space Charge Rayleigh Number Surface Potential Convective Instability Critical Rayleigh Number 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Avsec, D. and Luntz, M., Compt. Rend, 203, (1936), 1140, and 204, (1937) 470.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Steutzer, O. M., J App Phys, 30, (1959) 984, and 31, (1960) 136.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ostroumov, G. A., Soviet Phys JETP, 14, (1962) 317.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Watson, P. K., Schneider, J. M., and Till, H. R., Phys Fluids, 13, (1970) 1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Felici, N., Rev. Gén Elect, 78, (1969) 717.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Atten, P., CR Acad Sci, 283B, (1976) 29.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Atten, P. and Lacroix, J. C., J. Méchanique, 18, (1979) 469.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schneider, J. M. and Watson, P. K., Phys Fluids, 13, (1970) 1948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bénard, H., Ann de Chimie et de Physique, 23, (1901) 62.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Koschmieder, E. L. and Pallas, S, G., Int Heat Mass Transfer, 17, (1974) 991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rayleigh, Lord, Phil Mag, 32, (1916) 529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chandrasekhar, S., Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability Chapter II, Oxford, 1961Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Low, A. R., Nature, 115, (1925) 299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Watson, P. K. and Schneider, J. M., Ann Rep. 1969 Conf on Elec. Ins. and Diel. Phenom., p. 97.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Silveston, P. L., see ref. 15, p. 69.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Frenkel, J., J. Physics (USSR), 9, (1945) 385.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio Castellanos
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SevillaSpain

Personalised recommendations