Static Behaviour of Welded Rectangular Hollow Section Connections

  • G. Davies
Conference paper
Part of the International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 394)


Chapter 1 commences by giving an overview of the development and production of circular and rectangular hollow sections for structural purposes, and outlines various methods of analysis which have been used for assessing joint stiffness and strength. The yield line and finite element approaches are then introduced in greater detail. The yield line approach is used to obtain explicit expressions for estimates of the collapse load, and identify the importance of various joint perameters. The finite element method is described for elastic and non-linear behaviour, which is characteristic of the joints, taking into account both non linear material behaviour and large deflections. The chapter is concluded with examples of RHS joint design.


Shell Element Yield Line Corner Radius Collapse Load Fillet Weld 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.1
    Blockley, D.I. and W.Eastwood.: Elastic behaviour of joints between structural hollow sections, The Engineer, 8 July 1968, 22–25Google Scholar
  2. 1.2
    Venanzi, U.: Calcolo del nodi delle strutture tubolari, Construzioni Metalliche, 1 1979, 1–12.Google Scholar
  3. 1.3
    Redwood, R.G.: The bending of a plate loaded through a rigid rectangular inclusion, Int.Jnl.Mech.Sc., 7 1965, 421–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 1.4
    Redwood, R.G.: The behaviour of joints between rectangular hollow structural members, Civ.Eng.Pub.Wks.Rev., 1965, 1463–1469.Google Scholar
  5. 1.5
    Korol, R.M. and Mansur.: Theoretical analysis of haunch–reinforced T–joints in square hollow sections, Can.Jl.Civ.Eng., 6 1979, 601–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 1.6
    Czechowski, A. and T.Gasparski, J. Zycinski, J. Brodka.: Investigation into the static behaviour and strength of lattice girders made of RHS, Int. Inst.Wldg, I.I.W Doc.XV-, 1984, 562–84.Google Scholar
  7. 1.7
    Johansen, K.W.: Yield line theory-English translation, Cmt and Concte Assn, London 1962.Google Scholar
  8. 1.8
    Jubb, J.E.M, and R.G. Redwood.: Design of joints to box sections, in Industrial Building and the Structural Engineer, Conference -Inst.Str.Eng. May 1966Google Scholar
  9. 1.9
    Mouty, J.: Ultimate load calculations for welded joints comprising rectangular and square hollow sections, Cnstr. Met, CTICM, 2, June 1976.Google Scholar
  10. 1.10
    Roper, C.G.: An analytical study of the strength and flexibility of tubular joints, M. Phil. thesis, University of Nottingham, 1974Google Scholar
  11. 1.11
    Wardenier, J.: Hollow Section Joints, Delft University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  12. 1.12
    Davies, G. and C.G. Roper.: Gap joints with tubular members–a yield line approach, Build.Sci. 10, 1975 199–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 1.13
    Packer, J.A.: A theoretical analysis of welded steel joints in rectangular hollow sections, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nottingham, 1978.Google Scholar
  14. 1.14
    Szlendak, J. and J. Brodka.: Yield and buckling strength of T, Y and X joints in RHS trusses. Proc. 51 I.C.E, Part 2, TN 397, 79, 167–180, 1979.Google Scholar
  15. 1.15
    Zienkiewicz, O.C.: The Finite Element Method in Structural and Continuum Mechanics, McGraw-Hill Pub. Co. Ltd., London 1967.Google Scholar
  16. 1.16
    Dasgupta, A.: The behaviour of joints in tubular trusses, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nottingham, 1970.Google Scholar
  17. 1.17
    Wardenier, J. and H.D. Rink, G.D. de Winkel, R.S. Puthli. Numerical investigation into the static strength of stiffened I-beam-to-column connections, Tubular Structures - ISTS4, (Ed. J.Wardenier and E. Panjeh Shahi ), Delft University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  18. 1.18
    Alia, B.: Ed. Welding of tubular structures - international conference, Pergamon Press, U.S.A., 1984.Google Scholar
  19. 1.19
    Kurobane, Y. and Y. Makino.: -Ed Safety criteria in the design of tubular structures, I.I.W. and A.I.J., Tokyo, 1987.Google Scholar
  20. 1.20
    Niemi, E. and P. Makelainen: Ed. Tubular Structures (3), Elsevier App. Sc., England,1990Google Scholar
  21. 1.21
    Coutie, M.G. and G. Davies: Ed. Tubular Structures V, E. & F.N. Spon, London, 1993.Google Scholar
  22. 1.22
    Grundy, P. and A. Holgate, G.B. Wong.: Ed, Tubular Structures VI, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1994.Google Scholar
  23. 1.23
    Farkas, J. and K. Jarmai.: Ed. Tubular Structures VII, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1996. 1.24 Choo, Y.S. and G.J. Vander Vegte.: Ed. Tubular Structures VIII, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1998.Google Scholar
  24. 1.24
    Choo, Y.S. and G.J. Vander Vegte.: Ed. Tubular Structures VIII, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1998.Google Scholar
  25. 1.25
    BS DD ENV 1993–1–1.: 1992/A1: Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structure; Part 1–11 General Rules and Rules for Buildings; annex K – Hollow section lattice girders connections, 1998.Google Scholar
  26. 1.26
    Panjeh-Shahi, E.P.: The behaviour of RHS Tee joints under axial load and bending moment. PhD Thesis, University of Nottingham, 1983.Google Scholar
  27. 1.27
    Czechowski, A. and J. Brodka.: Etude de la resistance statique des assemblages oudes en croix de profils creux rectangulaires. Construction Metallique, No 3 Paris 1977, 1725.Google Scholar
  28. 1.28
    Davies, G. and K. Morita.: Three dimensional cross joints under combination axial branch loading. Tubular Structures ED J Wardenier and E Panjeh Shani. Delft University, 1991, 324–333.Google Scholar
  29. 1.29
    Davies, G. and.1.A Packer.: Predicting the strength of branch plate–RHS connections for punching shear, Can.J.Civ.Eng 9 No. 1, 1982, 458–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 1.30
    Davies, G. and J. Platt, C. Snell.: The buckling of long simply supported rectangular plates under partially distributed skew pinch loads. Report NUCE ST/10–1982. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Nottingham, 1982.Google Scholar
  31. 1.31
    Mouty, J.: Behaviour of welded joints of square and rectangular tubular structures - a theoretical approach based on the method of yield lines. Int. Inst. Welding. Doc. XV426–78, 1978.Google Scholar
  32. 1.32
    Davies, G. and C. Roper.: Gap joints with tubes–a yield line modified by shear approach, Bldg. And Enb., 12, 1997, 31–38.Google Scholar
  33. 1.33
    Packer, J.A. and G. Davies, M.G. Coutie.: Yield strength of gapped joints in rectangular hollow section trusses, Proc. Instn. Civ. Engnrs., Part 2 69, Dec. 1980, 995–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 1.34
    MARC.: Analysis Research Corporation, USAGoogle Scholar
  35. 1.35
    Yu, Y.: The static strength of uni-planar and multi-planar connections in RHS, PhD thesis, Delft University Press.Google Scholar
  36. 1.36
    Panje Shahi, E.E. and J. Wardenier, R.S. Puthli.: Interaction effects between braces on the SCF’s of multi planar SHS joints, Tubular Structures VI, Ed Grundy, Holgate and Wang, A.A. Balkema, 1994, 625–633.Google Scholar
  37. 1.37
    Davies, G. and M.G. Coutie, M. Bettision.: The behaviour of 3D RHS T joints under axial branch loads. Tubular Structures V, Ed Davies, G and Coutie M.G, E. and F.N Spon, 1993, 429–436.Google Scholar
  38. 1.38
    Davies, G. and P. Crockett.: The strength of welded T-DT joints in RHS and CHS under variable oxial loads, J. Construct. Steel Res. 37, No. 1, 1–31.Google Scholar
  39. 1.39
    Lu, L.L.: The static strength of I beam to rectangular hollow section connections, PhD thesis, Delft University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  40. 1.40
    Saidani, M. and M.G. Coutie.: Secondary moments in RHS lattice girders, Tubular Structures Y, Ed. Couties and Davies, E. and F.N Spon, London, 1993, 551–556.Google Scholar
  41. 1.41
    Philiastidies, A.: Fully overlapped rolled hollow section welded joints in trusses–PhD thesis, University of Nottingham, 1988.Google Scholar
  42. 1.42
    Coutie, M.G. and M. Saidani.: The adjustment of stiffness matrices. Computers and Structures 59 no. 1, 1996, 35–41.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. 1.43
    PAFEC Ltd., Strelly Hall, Nottingham, England.Google Scholar
  44. 1.44
    Davies, G. and R. Kelly.: Birdbeck joints in square hollow sections - a finite element investigation.Google Scholar
  45. 1.45
    Ono, T. and M. Iwata, K. Ishida.: An experimental study on joints of a new truss system using RHS. Tubular Structures (IV), Ed., Panji-Shahi and Wardenier, Delft University Press, 1991, 344–353.Google Scholar
  46. 1.46
    Ishida, K. and T. Ono, M. Iwata.: Ultimate strength formula for joints of new truss using RHS, Tubular Structures V, Ed. Coutie and Davies, E and F.N Spon, 1993, 511518.Google Scholar
  47. 1.47
    International Institute of Welding, Sub-commission XV-E.: Design recommendations for hollow section joints - Predominantly statically loaded, 2nd Ed., IIW. Doc. XV-70189, September 1989.Google Scholar
  48. 1.48
    Packer, J.A. and J. Wardenier, Y. Kurobane, D. Dutta, N. Yeomans.: CIDECT Design guide for rectangular hollow section (RHS) joints under predominantly static loading. Verlag TÜV Rheinland Gmbtt, 1992.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Davies
    • 1
  1. 1.University of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations