Finite Element Analysis of Transient Pulse Method for Permeability Measurements

  • Ö. Aydan
Conference paper
Part of the International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 397)


There are various methods to measure the permeability of rocks in literature. Among these methods, Transient Pulse Method proposed by Brace et al. (1968) has been widely used for rocks with low permeability in recent years. When the experimental relations of elapsed time with pressure difference between at the ends of a specimen are used to obtain the permeability of rocks, the compressibility of intrinsic rock material and fluid is not taken into account. Therefore, it is natural to expect that computed permeability values may be different from actual values. In this article, the author proposes a finite element method to model the transient pulse method by taking into account the compressibility of intrinsic rock material and fluid and investigate its effect on the computed permeability values through a series of parametric analyses and simulations of permeability tests.


Rock Mass Pressure Difference Rock Joint Radial Flow Finite Element Formulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. AYDAN, Ö. and A. ERSEN (1983). Ground freezing method and its application (in Turkish). Madencilik, 22(2), 33–44.Google Scholar
  2. AYDAN, Ö., H. ÜÇPIRTI and R. ULUSAY (1997). Theoretical formulation of D’Arcy’s law for fluid flow through porous and/or jointed rock and its validity (in Turkish). Bulletin of Rock Mechanics, Ankara, 13, 1–18.Google Scholar
  3. AYDAN, Ö., H. ÜÇPIRTI and N. TÜRK (1997). Theory of laboratory methods for measuring permeability of rocks and tests (in Turkish). Bulletin of Rock Mechanics, Ankara, 13, 19–36.Google Scholar
  4. BRACE, W.F., J.B. WALSH, J.B. and W.T. FRANGOS (1968). Permeability of granite under high pressure. Journal of Geophysical Research, 73(6), 2225–2236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ERÎNGEN, A. C. (1980). Mechanics of Continua. R.E. Krieger Pub. Co., 2nd Ed., New York.Google Scholar
  6. GALE, J. (1990). Hydraulic behaviour of rock joints. International Symposium on Rock Joints, Loen, 351–362.Google Scholar
  7. TSANG, Y.W., P.A. WITHERSPOON (1981). Hydro-mechanical behaviour of a deformable rock fracture subject to normal stress. J. Geophys. Res., 86(B10), 9287–9298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ZIMMERMAN, R.W., WH. SOMERTON, M.S. KING (1986). Compressibility of porous rocks. J. Geophys. Res., 91(B12), 12765–12777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ö. Aydan
    • 1
  1. 1.Tokai UniversityShimizuJapan

Personalised recommendations