Results from Two Geotechnical Benchmark Problems

  • H. F. Schweiger
Part of the International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 397)


One of the aims of the working group 1.6 “Numerical Methods in Geotechnics” of the German Society for Geotechnics is to provide recommendations for numerical analyses in geotechnical engineering. In addition benchmark examples are specified and the results obtained by various users employing different software are compared. So far two simple examples, namely a tunnel excavation and a deep excavation problem, have been set up and results have been discussed at a workshop. This paper summarizes the most important aspects of this exercise. It shows that despite the simplicity of the examples and the rather strict specifications significant differences in the results are obtained even in cases where the same software has been utilized by different users.


Surface Settlement Geotechnical Engineering Construction Stage Diaphragm Wall Tunnel Excavation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. MEISSNER H. (1996). Tunnelbau unter Tage — Empfehlungen des Arbeitskreises 1.6 “Numerik in der Geotechnik”, Abschnitt 2. Geotechnik, 19: 99–108.Google Scholar
  2. SCHWEIGER H.F. (1991). Benchmark Problem No. 1: Results. Computers and Geotechnics, 11: 331–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. SCHWEIGER H.F., H. SCHULLER & R. PÖTTLER (1997). Some remarks on 2-D-models for numerical simulation of underground constructions with complex cross sections. Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Computer Methods & Advances in Geomechanics, Wuhan, 2: 1303–1308.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. F. Schweiger
    • 1
  1. 1.Technical University GrazGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations