Advertisement

How to Utilize the Anti-Optimization Analysis to Treat Uncertainty in Seismic Excitation?

  • A. Baratta
  • G. Zuccaro
Part of the CISM Courses and Lectures book series (CISM, volume 388)

Abstract

In the paper an approach to treat uncertainty in the response of structures under the action of earthquakes is presented. The main problem is focused in the unpredictability of the seismic accelerograms, and the research effort points at identifying the set of admisible quakes by a few basic parameters (duration, peak acceleration, gross information on the power spectrum, ...). The influence of the details of ground shaking, that really have a very significant influence on the structure’s performance, is approached by the institution of a worst-case scenario. The basic idea is to build up a consistent model for the seismic hazard at the site, and to set up some rules which ground shaking must fit. Hence, the worst combination of details of the quake is sought by a search procedure, aiming at identifying the earthquake producing the extremum of some response parameters, in the set of admissible quakes. In the paper a number of r5eference models are set up, and results referred to a particular seismic area, the Campania region in Italy, are drawn, proving that the procedure is efficient and, to some extent, practical.

Keywords

Power Spectrum Ground Motion Return Period Peak Ground Acceleration Response Spectrum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Baratta A., Margiotta P. (1982): Some Remarks on Structural response under earthquakes, Proc. VII European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Athens, Greece, pp. 134–142Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baratta A. (1979): Earthquake Simulation in Aseismic Engineering, Proc. Int. Symp. “Symulation of Systems”, Sorrento, Italy, pp.517–536, North-Holland P.C.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baratta A. (1980): Analisi dei Dati e Simulazione per la Sicurezza Antisismica delle Costruzioni, Proc. of the Nat. Conf. “L’ Ingegneria Sismica in Italia”, Udine (Italy), pp. 1–13. (in Italian)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baratta A. (1981): Optimized Earthquake Simulation for High-Reliability Aseismic Design, Proc. 3rd Int. Seminar on “Reliability of Nuclear Power Plants”, Paris (France), pp. 299–300.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zuccaro G. (1991): Accelerogramma di Progetto per Verifiche ad Alta Affidabilita’: Analisi Costi-Benefici., Proc. 5th National Congress L’ingegneria Sismica in Italia, Palermo, Italy, pp. 1504–1517Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baratta A. , Zuccaro G. (1992): High-Reliability Aseismic Design, Proc. Tenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Madrid, Spain, pp. 3739–3744.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baratta A., Zuccaro G. (1993): Previsione di Risposta Nonlineare per Progettazione Antisismica ad Alta Affidabilita, Atti VI Convegno Nazionale: L’Ingegneria Sismica in Italia, Perugia, Italy, pp. 1193–1199. (in Italian)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baratta A., Zuccaro G. (1994): Worst Response of Structures under Not Sharply Defined Ground Motion, Proc. 10th European Conference on Earthuake Engineering, Vienna, pp. 1179–1183.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ruiz P., Penzien J. (1969): Probabilistic Study of the Behaviour of Structures During Earthquakes, Internal Report, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engrg, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ruiz P., Penzien J. (1971): Stochastic Seismic Response of Structures, Proc. ASCE, vol. 97, N. EM2, pp.441–456.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Drenick RF. (1970): Model-Free Design of Aseismic Structures, Proc. ASCE, Journ. of Engineering Mechanics Division, Vol. 96,N. EM4, pp. 483–493,1970.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Drenick RF. (1973): Aseismic Design by Way of Critical Excitation, Proc. ASCE, Journ of Engineering Mechanics Division, Vol. 99, N. EM4, pp. 649–667.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Drenick RF. (1977): On the class of the Non-Robust Problems in Stochastic Dynamics, in “Stochastic Problems in Dynamics”, B.L. Clarkson ed., Pitman, London, pp. 237–255.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Drenick RF., Yun C.B: (1979): Reliability of Seismic Resistance Predictions, Journal of the Structural Division, Vol. 105, pp. 1879–1891.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shinozuka M. (1970): Maximum Structural Response to Seismic Excitations, Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division, Vol. 96, 729–738, 1970.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Elishakoff I., Pletner B. (1991): Analysis of Base Excitation as an Uncertain Function with Specified Bounds on It and Its Derivatives, in Structural Vibration and Acoustics (T.C. Huang et al, eds.) DE-Vol. 34, ASME, pp. 177–184.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zuccaro G., Elishakoff I., Baratta A. and Shinozuka M. (in print): Ellipsoidal Modeling of EarthquakesGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Baratta A., Elishakoff I., Zuccaro G. and Shinozuka M. (in print): A Convex Model for Bounds on The Seismic Response of Linear StructuresGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ben-Haim Y., Elishakoff I. (1990): Convex Modeling of Uncertainty in Applied Mechanics, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schweppe F.C. (1973): Uncertain Dynamical Systems, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliff, NJ.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Elishakoff I, Ben-Haim Y. (1990): Dynamics of a Thin Cylindricxal Shell Under Impact with Limited Deterministic Information on Its Initial Imperfection, Structural Safety, Vol. 8, pp. 103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rao S.S. (1978): Optimization: Theory and Applications, Wiley E.L.., New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Coburn A.W., Spence R. and Zuccaro G., (1986): Seismic Risk to Population in Campania, a Model for Regional Planning, Final Report, Joint Research University of Cambridge, “The Martin Centre” and University of Naples “Research Centre LUPT” Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Baratta A., Cacace F., (1986): Modello Probabilistico di Pericolosita’ Finalizzato all’Analisi di Rischio Sismico, Proc. 1 st International Conference Towards the New Planning, vol. I°, pp. 113–140, Naples, Italy.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cornell C. A., (1968): Engineering seismic risk analysis, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 58, 5, pp 1583–1606.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gutenberg B., Richter C. F., (1954): Seismicity of the Earth and Associated Phenomena, Princetown University Press.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Coburn A.W., Sakay R.J.S., Spence R. and Pomonis A. (1990): A Parameterless Scale of Seismic Intensity for Use in Vulnerability Assessment, Final Report. Cambridge Architectural research Ltd.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Baratta
    • 1
  • G. Zuccaro
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Naples “Federico II”NaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations