Advertisement

Arch Dams pp 289-403 | Cite as

Dynamic Behaviour of Arch Dams

  • R. T. Severn
Part of the International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 367)

Abstract

Probably the most important, and yet the most difficult aspect of designing arch dams for seismic forces is that of determining what such forces will be. As with all structures, determining seismic design parameters for a site requires the analysis of data from geologic, geophysical, seismological and geotechnical studies. For the site region, such studies are used to develop statistical and deterministic models to characterise the earthquake source, the wave propagation path and the local ground response. The required data is obtained from observational and instrumental data from earthquakes and aftershocks, regional seismicity networks, geologic mapping, geophysical and corresponding laboratory measurements and analytical models. Because of the uncertainties in such data, the design process normally adopts a conservative stance, examples of which include the following:
  1. 1

    Using a rare event as the maximum possible earthquake because the location and magnitude of potential earthquakes are uncertain.

     
  2. 2

    Using upper-bound values for the peak ground acceleration expected at the site because of uncertainties in attenuation laws.

     
  3. 3

    Using upper bound values for the design response spectrum because of the variation in such calculated spectra for the same peak value of ground acceleration and/or intensity.

     

Keywords

Ground Motion Peak Ground Acceleration Response Spectrum Hydrodynamic Pressure Fluid Element 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Altinisik D, Severn R T. Multiple-Support and Asynchronous Base Excitation of Structures. Proc Instn Civ Engrs, Part 2, 1981, 71, June 407–426Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dumanoglu AA, Severn R T. Dynamic Response of Dams and Other Structures to Differential Ground Motions. Proc lnstn Civ Engs, Part 2, 1984, 77, Sept 333–352Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Calciati F, Castoldi A, Ciacci R, Fanelli M. Experience Gained During In-situ Artificial and Natural Dynamic Excitation of Large Concrete Dams in Italy; Analytical Interpretation of Results. Trans. (COLD Congress, New Delhi 1979, 4, Q51, R32Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zienkiewicz O C, Clough R W, Seed H B. Earthquake Analysis Procedures for Dams - State of the Art, ICOLD Bulletin No 52 1986Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Altinisik D A, et al. Seismic Design of Arch Dams Particularly the Contribution from the Reservoir and Multiple Support Excitation of the Bas Paper 24, Dams and Earthquakes, ICE London 1981Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Report on Observations of Kurobe Dam, Kansai Electric Power Company 1971Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. T. Severn
    • 1
  1. 1.University of BristolUK

Personalised recommendations