# Finite Difference and Finite Element Methods

• U. R. Kristiansen
• M. Dhainaut
• T. F. Johansen
Conference paper
Part of the CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 396)

## Abstract

Applications of the finite difference and finite element techniques to vibroacoustic problems are presented. The basic ideas and the mathematical descriptions are outlined for both of the methods and examples are given to demonstrate the potential of such numerical techniques. The finite difference method is illustrated by studying the resonant frequencies and forced response of a cavity closed by an elastic plate. The Helmholtz and Kirchhoff plate equations are the starting points for the discretization. It is also demonstrated how the Richardson extrapolation method can be used to minimize the errors in the numerical calculations. For the finite element method, the idea is first illustrated by solving a simple acoustic duct problem. It is further shown how models can be made for vibrating plates based on a thick plate theory, and for wave propagation in elastic solids. The coupling of plates and acoustic fields is again illustrated by calculations of resonant frequencies for different plate cavity geometries. Another example considered is the excitation of a cylinder on the ocean floor. As the acoustic damping by porous materials is of importance in noise control, it is shown how a finite element model can be made for a porous elastic material (Biot theory). Use of the model is illustrated by a study of sound transmission through a wall made up by a porous materia! sandwiched between two elastic plates.

## Keywords

Finite Element Method Finite Difference Porous Material Pore Fluid Helmholtz Equation
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

## Bibliography

1. [1]
W. Cheney and D. Kincaid 1994 Numerical Mathematics and Computing, 3d edition. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Pacific Grove, California USA.
2. [2]
A.W. Leissa 1969 Vibration of Plates NASA SP-160 Washington D.C. U.S.A.Google Scholar
3. [3]
G.M.L. Gladwell and G. Zimmermann 1966 Journal of Sound and Vibration 3,233–241. On energy and complementary energy formulations of acoustic and structural vibration problems.
4. [4]
A. Craggs 1971 Journal of Sound and Vibration 15,509–528. The transient response of a coupled plate-acoustic system using plate and acoustic finite elements.
5. [5]
M. Petyt and S.P. Lim 1978 International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 13, 109–122. Finite element analysis of the noise inside a mechanically excited cylinder.
6. [6]
G.C. Everstine 1981 Journal of Sound and Vibration 79, 157–160. A symmetric potential formulation for fluid-structure interaction.
7. [7]
G. Sandberg and P. Göransson 1988 Journal of Sound and Vibration 123, 507–515. A symmetric finite element formulation for acoustic fluid-structure interaction analysis.
8. [8]
H.J-P. Morand and R. Ohayon 1995 Fluid-Structure Interaction, chap VIII, The u,p,ø formulation, John Wiley and sons.
9. [9]
O.C. Zienkiewicz and R.L. Taylor 1991, The Finite Element method (4th edition) volume 2, McGraw-Hill International (U.K.)Google Scholar
10. [10]
T.F. Johansen, U. Kristiansen, M. Dhainaut, and B. Brouard 1996 FEMAK -User’s manual. Report nr. 42604, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Telecommunications (Trondheim, Norway)Google Scholar
11. [11]
M. Dhainaut 1996 Finite Element Procedures for Fluid-Structure Interactions in Acoustics. Doctorate Thesis (report 429612), Norwegian University for Science and Technology. Trondheim NorwayGoogle Scholar
12. [12]
O. Thon 1996 The Finite Element Method applied to Scattering by Elastic Objects on the Sea Floor. Master’s thesis, Institute of Telecommunications, Norwegian University for Science and Technology, Trondheim NorwayGoogle Scholar
13. [13]
M. A. Biot 1956 Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 28, 168–178 Theory of propagation of elastic waves in fluid-saturated porous solid.i. low-frequency range.
14. [14]
M.A. Biot 1962 Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 34, 1254–1264 Generalized theory of acoustic propagation in porous dissipative media.
15. [15]
M.A. Biot 1962 Journal of Applied Physics 33, 1482–1498 Mechanics of deformation and acoustic propagation in porous media.
16. [16]
J.F. Allard 1993 Propagation of Sound in Porous media, Modelling Sound Absorbing Materials. Elsevier, LondonGoogle Scholar
17. [17]
S. Timoshenko and D.H. Young 1974 Vibration Problems in Engineering (4th edition). John Wiley and Sons New YorkGoogle Scholar
18. [18]
B.R. Simon, J.S.-S. Wu, O.C. Zienkiewicz, and D.K. Paul 1986 International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 10, 461–482 Evaluation of u — w and u — π finite element methods for the dynamic response of saturated porous media using one-dimensional models.
19. [19]
D.L. Johnson, J. Koplik, and R. Dashen 1987 Journal of Fluid Mechanics 176,379–402 Theory of dynamic permeability and tortuosity in fluid-saturated porous elastic solids.
20. [20]
T.E. Vigran, L. Kelders, W. Lauriks, M. Dhainaut, and T.F. Johansen 1997 Acta Acustica 83, 1024–1031 Forced response of a sandwich plate with a flexible core described by a Biot-model.