Advertisement

Camshafts and the Valve Train

  • Kevin Hoag
  • Brian Dondlinger
Chapter
Part of the Powertrain book series (POWERTRAIN)

Abstract

The poppet valve, as previously detailed in Fig. 9.5, is now used universally in four-stroke vehicular engines—both to draw fresh charge into the cylinder, and to exhaust the spent products. The valves face an especially harsh environment. Because they are exposed directly to the combustion chamber, and provide very restrictive heat transfer paths they operate at especially high temperatures. The demand for rapid opening and closing results in high impact loads, and a requirement for high hardness valves and seats. The combination of high hardness and high temperature requirements drives the selection of special steel alloys, typically with high nickel content for both the valve head and the valve seat. Most automobile valves are made as a single piece, while the valves in heavy-duty engines generally have the nickel alloy head inertia welded to a mild steel stem. Hollow stem two-piece valves are generating interest in automobile applications, for savings of both weight and cost. A valve spring and retainer assembly as shown in Fig. 9.5 completes the installation. The retainer is typically stamped from mild steel, and holds the spring in a partially compressed position with two hardened steel keepers fitted near the top of the valve stem.

Keywords

Engine Speed Intake Valve Valve Lift Valve Train Valve Spring 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Allen, J., Law, D.: Production electro-hydraulic variable valve-train for a new generation of I.C. engines. SAE 2002-01-1109 (2002)Google Scholar
  2. Arnold, E.B., Bara, M.A., Zang, D.M., Tunnecliffe, T.N., Oltean, J.: Development and application of a cycle for evaluating factors contributing to diesel engine valve guttering. SAE 880669 (1988)Google Scholar
  3. Colechin, M., Stone, C.R., Leonard, H.J.: Analysis of roller-follower valve gear. SAE 930692 (1993)Google Scholar
  4. Druschitz, A.P., Thelen, S.: Induction hardened ductile iron camshafts. SAE 2002-01-0918 (2002)Google Scholar
  5. Duffy, P.E.: An experimental investigation of sliding at cam to roller tappet contacts. SAE 930691 (1993)Google Scholar
  6. Flierl, R., Klüting, M.: The third generation of valvetrains—new fully variable valvetrains for throttle-free load control. SAE 2000-01-1227 (2000)Google Scholar
  7. Hannibal, W., Flierl, R., Stiegler, L., Meyer, R.: Overview of current continuously variable valve lift systems for four-stroke spark-ignition engines and the criteria for their design ratings. SAE 2004-01-1263 (2004)Google Scholar
  8. Keribar, R.: A valvetrain design analysis tool with multiple functionality. SAE 2000-01-0562 (2000)Google Scholar
  9. Kerres, R., Schwarz, D., Bach, M., Fuoss, K., Eichenberg, A., Wüst, J.: Overview of measurement technology for valve lift and rotation on motored and fired engines. SAE 2012-01-0159 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. Kirsten, K.: The variable valve train in the debate on downsizing and hybrid drives. 32nd International Vienna Motor Symposium (April 2011)Google Scholar
  11. Kramer, U., Phlips, P.: Phasing strategy for an engine with twin variable cam timing. SAE 2002-01-1101 (2002)Google Scholar
  12. Kreuter, P., Heuser, P., Reinicke-Murmann, J., Erz, R., Peter, U., Böcker, O.: Variable valve actuation—switchable and continuously variable valve lifts. SAE 2003-01-0026 (2003)Google Scholar
  13. Norton, R.L., Eovaldi, D., Westbrook III, J., Stene, R.L.: Effect of valve-cam ramps on valve train dynamics. SAE 1999-01-0801 (1999)Google Scholar
  14. Pischinger, M., Salber, W., van der Staay, F., Baumgarten, H., Kemper, H.: Benefits of the electromechanical valve train in vehicle operation. SAE 2000-01-1223 (2000)Google Scholar
  15. Rodriguez, J., Keribar, R., Fialek, G.: A comprehensive drive chain model applicable to valvetrain systems. SAE 2005-01-1650 (2005a)Google Scholar
  16. Rodriguez, J., Keribar, R., Fialek, G.: A geartrain model with dynamic or quasi-static formulation for variable mesh stiffness. SAE 2005-01-1649 (2005b)Google Scholar
  17. Roth, G.: Fatigue analysis methodology for predicting engine valve life. SAE 2003-01-0726 (2003)Google Scholar
  18. Sakaguchi, M., Yamada, S., Seki, M., Koiwa, Y., Yamauchi, T., Wakabayashi, T.: Study on reduction of timing chain friction using multi-body dynamics. SAE 2012-01-0412 (2012)Google Scholar
  19. Sandhu, J.S., Wehrly, M.K., Perkins, N.C., Ma, Z.-D., Design kit for accessory drives (DKAD): Dynamic analysis of serpentine belt drives. SAE 2003-01-1661 (2003)Google Scholar
  20. Schamel, A.R., Hammacher, J., Utsch, D.: Modeling and measurement techniques for valve spring dynamics in high revving internal combustion engines. SAE 930615 (1993)Google Scholar
  21. Sellnau, M., Rask, E.: Two-step variable valve actuation for fuel economy, emissions, and performance. SAE 2003-01-0029 (2003)Google Scholar
  22. Suh, I.-S., Lyon, R.H.: An investigation of valve train noise for the sound quality of I.C. engines. SAE 1999-01-1711 (1999)Google Scholar
  23. Takagishi, H., Shimoyama, K., Asari, M.: Prediction of camshaft torque and timing chain load for turbo direct injection diesel engine. SAE 2004-01-0611 (2004)Google Scholar
  24. Turner, J.W.G., Bassett, M.D., Pearson, R.J., Pitcher, G., Douglas, K.J.: New operating strategies afforded by fully variable valve trains. SAE 2004-01-1386 (2004)Google Scholar
  25. Wang, Y.: Introduction to engine valvetrains. SAE International, Warrendale, PA (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Vienna 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Southwest Research InstituteSan AntonioUSA
  2. 2.MilwaukeeUSA

Personalised recommendations