Skip to main content

Minimally Invasive Thoracolumbar Facet Joint Fusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Minimally Invasive Spinal Deformity Surgery

Abstract

For minimally invasive spine surgery to be successful, it is mandatory that it achieves the same goals that open surgical procedures achieve. By avoiding collateral damages to anatomic structures, the purported advantages of minimally invasive techniques include reduction in postoperative pain, length of hospitalization, blood loss, and medical and surgical complications. During the past several years, surgeons have been expanding the indications for minimally invasive techniques from degenerative procedures to more complex spinal disorders, including thoracolumbar deformity, trauma, tumor, and infections. Paramount to successful results of treatment of many thoracolumbar pathological conditions is achieving a solid biological fusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. King D. Internal fixation for lumbosacral fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1948;30:560–5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ferrara LA, Secor JL, Jin BH, Wakefield A, Inceoglu S, Benzel EC. A biomechanical comparison of facet screw fixation and pedicle screw fixation: effects of short-term and long-term repetitive cycling. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28:1226–34.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boucher HH. A method of spinal fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1959;41:248–59.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Magerl FP. Stabilization of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine with external skeletal fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;189:125–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Thompson WA, El R. Pseudarthrosis following spine fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1949;31:400–5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. El Masry MA, McAllen CJ, Weatherley CR. Lumbosacral fusion using the Boucher technique in combination with a posterolateral bone graft. Eur Spine J. 2003;12:408–12.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Margulies JY, Seimon LP. Clinical efficacy of lumbar and lumbosacral fusion using the Boucher facet screw fixation technique. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2000;59:33–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jacobs RR, Montesano PX, Jackson RP. Enhancement of lumbar spine fusion by use of translaminar facet joint screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989;14:12–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Humke T, Grob D, Dvorak J, Messikommer A. Translaminar screw fixation of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine: a 5-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998;23:1180–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Grob D, Humke T. Translaminar screw fixation in the lumbar spine: technique, indications, results. Eur Spine J. 1998;7:178–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Reich SM, Kuflik P, Neuwirth M. Translaminar facet screw fixation in lumbar spine fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993;18:444–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Best NM, Sasso RC. Efficacy of translaminar facet screw fixation in circumferential interbody fusions as compared to pedicle screw fixation. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006;19:98–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wild MH, Glees M, Plieschnegger C, Wenda K. Five-year follow-up examination after purely minimally invasive posterior stabilization of thoracolumbar fractures: a comparison of minimally invasive percutaneously and conventionally open treated patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007;127:335–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schmidt OI, Strasser S, Kaufmann V, Strasser E, Gahr RH. Role of early minimal-invasive spine fixation in acute thoracic and lumbar spine trauma. Indian J Orthop. 2007;41:374–80.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Merom L, Raz N, Hamud C, Weisz I, Hanani A. Minimally invasive burst fracture fixation in the thoracolumbar region. Orthopedics. 2009;32.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kim DY, Lee SH, Chung SK, Lee HY. Comparison of multifidus muscle atrophy and trunk extension muscle strength: percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30:123–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Regev GJ, Lee YP, Taylor WR, Garfin SR, Kim CW. Nerve injury to the posterior rami medial branch during the insertion of pedicle screws: comparison of mini-open versus percutaneous pedicle screw insertion techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34:1239–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lehmann W, Ushmaev A, Ruecker A, Nuechtern J, Grossterlinden L, Begemann PG, Baeumer T, Rueger JM, Briem D. Comparison of open versus percutaneous pedicle screw insertion in a sheep model. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:857–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Charles Y, Zairi F, Vincent C, Fuentes S, Bronsard N, Court C, Huec J-C. Minimally invasive posterior surgery for thoracolumbar fractures: new trends to decrease muscle damage. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2012;22:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rampersaud YR, Annand N, Dekutoski MB. Use of minimally invasive surgical techniques in the management of thoracolumbar trauma: current concepts. Spine. 2006;31(11):S96–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ni WF, Huang YX, Chi YL, Xu HZ, Lin Y, Wang XY, Huang QS, Mao FM. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for neurologic intact thoracolumbar burst fractures. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010;23:530–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Palmisani M, Gasbarrini A, Brodano GB, De Iure F, Cappuccio M, Boriani L, Amendola L, Boriani S. Minimally invasive percutaneous fixation in the treatment of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures. Eur Spine J. 2009;18(1):71–4.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kang HY, Lee SH, Jeon SH, Shin SW. Computed tomography-guided percutaneous facet screw fixation in the lumbar spine: technical note. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;7:95–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sasso RC, Best NM, Potts EA. Percutaneous computer-assisted translaminar facet screw: an initial human cadaveric study. Spine J. 2005;5:515–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven C. Ludwig M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tannous, O., Banagan, K., Ludwig, S.C. (2014). Minimally Invasive Thoracolumbar Facet Joint Fusion. In: Wang, M., Lu, Y., Anderson, D., Mummaneni, P. (eds) Minimally Invasive Spinal Deformity Surgery. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1407-0_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1407-0_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-1406-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-1407-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics