Skip to main content

The Process of Change in Psychotherapy: Common and Unique Factors

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Psychotherapy Research

Abstract

As a field, psychotherapy has long been dominated by the different types (or orientations) of psychological therapies in practice. Though there are hundreds if not thousands of different kinds of psychotherapy, in many ways some are quite similar—they share some common factors. In other ways, each orientation may possess some unique elements, or combinations of elements not found in most other kinds of therapy: unique factors. In this chapter, we describe how the theoretical and empirical discussions of common and unique factors have progressed historically, highlighting major contributions in identifying and organizing the influential components and active ingredients of psychotherapy. It can be shown that both common factors and more unique factors can be reliably identified, and that these factors can be linked with outcome, and may both be necessary to the successful application of any psychological therapy. Ultimately, the distinction between “common” and “unique” factors may be a false dichotomy when comparing many face-to-face psychotherapies, because neither common factors nor unique factors can exist without the other. Common factors rely on specific treatments, and unique factors exist in the context of common variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andrusyna TP, Luborsky L, Pham T, Tang TZ (2006) The mechanisms of sudden gains in supportive-expressive therapy for depression. Psychother Res 16:526–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asay T, Lambert M (1999) The empirical case for the common factors in therapy. In: Hubble M, Duncan B, Miller S (eds) The heart and soul of change. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 23–55

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barber JP (2009) Toward a working through of some core conflicts in psychotherapy research. Psychother Res 19:1–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barber JP, Muran JC (eds) (2010) The therapeutic alliance: an evidence-based approach to practice and training. Guilford, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber JP, Khalsa S-R, Sharpless BA (2010) The validity of the alliance as a predictor of psychotherapy outcome. In: Muran JC, Barber JP (eds) The therapeutic alliance: an evidence-based guide to practice. Guilford, New York, pp 29–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohart AC, Elliott R, Greenberg LS, Watson JC (2002) Empathy. In: Norcross JC (ed) Psychotherapy relationships that work. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 89–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordin ES (1979) The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy 16:252–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boswell JF, Castonguay LG, Wasserman RH (2010) Effects of psychotherapy training and intervention use on session outcome. J Consult Clin Psychol 78:717–723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burns DD, Nolen-Hoeksema S (1991) Coping styles, homework compliance, and the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy. J Consult Clin Psychol 59:305–311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burns DD, Nolen-Hoeksema S (1992) Therapeutic empathy and recovery from depression in cognitive-behavioral therapy: a structural equation model. J Consult Clin Psychol 60:441–449

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burns DD, Spangler DL (2000) Does psychotherapy homework lead to improvements in depression in cognitive-behavioral therapy or does improvement lead to increased homework compliance? J Consult Clin Psychol 68:46–56

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Castonguay LG (1993) “Common factors” and “nonspecific variables”: clarification of the two concepts and recommendations for research. J Psychother Integr 3:267–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Castonguay LG (2000) A common factors approach to psychotherapy training. J Psychother Integr 10:263–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castonguay LG (2006) Personal pathways in psychotherapy integration. J Psychother Integr 16:36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castonguay LG (2009) Marvin goldfried’s (1980) american psychologist paper: (re) introducing a classic. Appl Prev Psychol 13:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castonguay LG (2011) Psychotherapy, psychopathology, research and practice: pathways of connections and integration. Psychother Res 21:125–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Castonguay LG, Beutler LE (2006) Common and unique principles of therapeutic change: What do we know and what do we need to know? In: Castonguay LG, Beutler LE (eds) Principles of therapeutic change that work. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 353–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Castonguay LG, Grosse Holtforth M (2005) Change in psychotherapy: a plea for no more “non-specific” and false dichotomy. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 12:198–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castonguay LG, Hill CE (eds) (2007) Insight in psychotherapy. American Psychological Association Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Castonguay LG, Hill CE (eds) (2012) Transformation in psychotherapy: corrective experiences across cognitive behavioral, humanistic, and psychodynamic approaches. American Psychological Association Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Castonguay LG, Constantino MJ, Grosse Holtforth M (2006) The working alliance: where are we and where should we go? Psychotherapy 43:271–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Castonguay LG, Constantino MJ, McAleavey AA, Goldfried MR (2010) The therapeutic alliance in cognitive-behavioral therapy. In: Muran JC, Barber JP (eds) The therapeutic alliance: an evidence-based guide to practice. Guilford, New York, pp 150–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantino MJ, Castonguay LG, Schut AJ (2002) The working alliance: a flagship for the “scientist-practitioner” model in psychotherapy. In: Tryon GS (ed) Counseling based on process research: applying what we know. Allyn & Bacon, Boston, pp 81–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Crits-Christoph P (1997) Limitations of the dodo bird verdict and the role of clinical trials in psychotherapy research: comment on Wampold et al. (1997). Psychol Bull 122:216–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crits-Christoph P, Cooper A, Luborsky L (1988) The accuracy of therapists’ interpretations and the outcome of dynamic psychotherapy. J Consult Clin Psychol 56:490–495

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crits-Christoph P, Gibbons MB, Temes CM, Elkin I, Gallop R (2010) Interpersonal accuracy of interventions and the outcome of cognitive and interpersonal therapies for depression. J Consult Clin Psychol 78:420–428

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dimidjian S, Hollon SD, Dobson KS, Schmaling KB, Kohlenberg RJ, Addis ME, Gallop R, McGlinchey JB, Markley DK, Gollan JK, Atkins DC, Dunner DL, Jacobson NS (2006) Randomized trial of behavioral activation, cognitive therapy, and antidepressant medication in the acute treatment of adults with major depression. J Consult Clin Psychol 74:658–670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott R, Bohart AC, Watson JC, Greenberg LS (2011) Empathy. Psychotherapy (Chic) 48:43–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farber BA, Doolin EM (2011) Positive regard. Psychotherapy (Chic) 48:58–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farber B, Lane JS (2002) Positive regard. In: Norcross JC (ed) Psychotherapy relationships that work. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 175–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank JD (1961) Persuasion and healing. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank JD, Frank JB (1991) Persuasion and healing. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield SL (1980) Psychotherapy: an eclectic approach. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfried MR (1980) Toward the delineation of therapeutic change principles. Am Psychol 35:991–999

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldfried MR, Padawer W (1982) Current status and future directions in psychotherapy. In: Goldfried MR (ed) Converging themes in psychotherapy. Springer, New York, pp 3–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfried MR, Raue PJ, Castonguay LG (1998) The therapeutic focus in significant sessions of master therapists: a comparison of cognitive-behavioral and psychodynamic-interpersonal interventions. J Consult Clin Psychol 66:803–810

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grencavage LM, Norcross JC (1990) Where are the commonalities among the therapeutic common factors? Prof Psychol Res Pr 21:372–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill CE (2009) Reaction to goldfried (1980): What about therapist techniques? Appl Prev Psychol 13:16–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill CE, O’Grady KE (1985) List of therapist intentions illustrated in a case study and with therapists of varying theoretical orientations. J Couns Psychol 32:3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffart A, Borge F-M, Sexton H, Clark DM (2009) The role of common factors in residential cognitive and interpersonal therapy for social phobia: a process-outcome study. Psychother Res 19:54–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoglend P, Amlo S, Marble A, Bogwald KP, Sorbye O, Sjaastad MC, Heyerdahl O (2006) Analysis of the patient-therapist relationship in dynamic psychotherapy: an experimental study of transference interpretations. Am J Psychiatry 163:1739–1746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horvath AO, Bedi RP (2002) The alliance. In: Norcross JC (ed) Psychotherapy relationships that work. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 37–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvath AO, Greenberg LS (eds) (1994) The working alliance: theory, research, and practice. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvath AO, Luborsky L (1993) The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy. J Consult Clin Psychol 61:561–573

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horvath AO, Del Re AC, Fluckiger C, Symonds D (2011) Alliance in individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy (Chic) 48:9–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard KI, Kopta SM, Krause MS, Orlinsky DE (1986) The dose-effect relationship in psychotherapy. Am Psychol 41:159–164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howard KI, Lueger RJ, Maling MS, Martinovich Z (1993) A phase model of psychotherapy outcome: causal mediation of change. J Consult Clin Psychol 61:678–685

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson NS, Dobson KS, Truax PA, Addis ME, Koerner K, Gollan JK, Gortner E, Prince SE (1996) A component analysis of cognitive-behavioral treatment for depression. J Consult Clin Psychol 64:295–304

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson P, Hoglend P, Ulberg R, Amlo S, Marble A, Bogwald KP, Sorbye O, Sjaastad MC, Heyerdahl O (2010) The mediating role of insight for long-term improvements in psychodynamic therapy. J Consult Clin Psychol 78:438–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones EE, Pulos SM (1993) Comparing the process in psychodynamic and cognitive-behavioral therapies. J Consult Clin Psychol 61:306–316

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karasu TB (1986) The specificity versus nonspecificity dilemma: toward identifying therapeutic change agents. Am J Psychiatry 143:687–695

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klein MH, Kolden GG, Michels JL, Chisholm-Stockard SM (2002) Congruence. In: Norcross JC (ed) Psychotherapy relationships that work. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 195–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolden GG (1991) The generic model of psychotherapy: an empirical investigation of patterns of process and outcome relationships. Psychother Res 1:62–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolden GG (1996) Change in early sessions of dynamic therapy: universal processes and the generic model of psychotherapy. J Consult Clin Psychol 64:489–496

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kolden GG, Klein MH, Wang CC, Austin SB (2011) Congruence/genuineness. Psychotherapy (Chic) 48:65–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert MJ, Ogles BM (2004) The efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy. In: Lambert MJ (ed) Bergin & Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. Wiley, New York, pp 139–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert MJ, DeJulio SS, Stein DM (1978) Therapist interpersonal skills: process, outcome, methodological considerations and recommendations for future research. Psychol Bull 85:467–489

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert MJ, Hansen NB, Finch AE (2001) Patient-focused research: using patient outcome data to enhance treatment effects. J Consult Clin Psychol 69:159–172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lampropoulos GK (2000) Definitional and research issues in the common factors approach to psychotherapy integration: misconceptions, clarifications, and proposals. J Psychother Integr 10:415–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson BPM, Kaldo V, Broberg A (2010) Theoretical orientation and therapists’ attitudes to important components of therapy: a study based on the valuable elements in psychotherapy questionnaire. Cogn Behav Ther 39:161–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luborsky L, Singer B, Luborsky L (1975) Comparative studies of psychotherapies. Is it true that “everyone has won and all must have prizes”? Arch Gen Psychiatry 32:995–1008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz W, Leon SC, Martinovich Z, Lyons JS, Stiles WB (2007) Therapist effects in outpatient psychotherapy: a three-level growth curve approach. J Couns Psychol 54:32–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks IM, Gelder MG (1966) Common ground between behavior therapy and psychodynamic methods. Br J Med Psychol 39:11–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marmor J (1976) Common operational factors in diverse approaches to behavior change. In: Burton DA (ed) What makes behavior change possible? Burnner/Mazel, New York, pp 3–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin DJ, Garske JP, Davis MK (2000) Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: a meta-analytic review. J Consult Clin Psychol 68:438–450

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masserman JH (1980) Principles and practice of biodynamic psychotherapy: an integration. Thieme-Stratton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy KS, Barber JP (2009) The multitheoretical list of therapeutic interventions (multi): initial report. Psychother Res 19:96–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Messer SB (1986) Behavioral and psychoanalytic perspectives at therapeutic choice points. Am Psychol 41:1261–1272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Messer SB, Wolitzky DL (2010) A psychodynamic perspective on the therapeutic alliance: theory, research, and practice. In: Muran JC, Barber JP (eds) The therapeutic alliance: an evidence-based guide to practice. Guilford, New York, pp 97–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris RJ, Magrath KH (1979) Contribution of therapist warmth to the contact desensitization treatment of acrophobia. J Consult Clin Psychol 47:786–788

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morris RJ, Suckerman KR (1974) The importance of the therapeutic relationship in systematic desensitization. J Consult Clin Psychol 42:148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murray EJ, Jacobson LI (1971) Cognition and learning in traditional and behavioral psychotherapy. In: Bergin AE, Garfield SL (eds) Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. Wiley, New York, pp 661–688

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson DL, Castonguay LG, Barwick F (2005) Directions for the integration of homework in psychotherapy practice. In: Kazantis N, L’Abate L (eds) Handbook of homework assignments in psychotherapy: research, practice, and prevention. Springer, New York, pp 425–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Norcross JC (1995) Dispelling the dodo bird verdict and the exclusivity myth in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy 32:500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norcross JC (ed) (2002) Psychotherapy relationships that work. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Omer H, London P (1989) Signal and noise in psychotherapy: the role and control of non-specific factors. Br J Psychiatry 155:239–245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orlinsky DE (2009) The “generic model of psychotherapy” after 25 years: evolution of a research-based metatheory. J Psychother Integr 19:319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlinsky DE, Howard KI (1967) The good therapy hour. Experiential correlates of patients’ and therapists’ evaluations of therapy sessions. Arch Gen Psychiatry 16:621–632

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orlinsky DE, Grawe K, Parks BK (1994) Process and outcome in psychotherapy—noch einmal. In: Garfield SL, Bergin AE (eds) Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlinsky DE, Ronnestad MH, Willutzki U (2004) Fifty years of process-outcome research: continuity and change. In: Lambert MJ (ed) Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. Wiley, New York, pp 307–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper WE, Joyce AS, McCallum M, Azim HF (1993) Concentration and correspondence of transference interpretations in short-term psychotherapy. J Consult Clin Psychol 61:586–595

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prochaska J, DiClemente C (1984) The transtheoretical approach: towards a systematic eclectic framework. Dow Jones Irwin, Homewood, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoads JM, Feather BW (1972) Transference and resistance observed in behavior therapy. Br J Med Psychol 45:99–103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers CR (1957) The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. J Consult Psychol 21:95–103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig S (1936) Some implicit common factors in diverse methods of psychotherapy. Am J Orthopsychiatry 6:412–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schut AJ, Castonguay LG, Bedics JD, Smith TL, Barber JP, Flanagan KM, Yamasaki AS (2005) Therapist interpretation, patient-therapist interpersonal process, and outcome in psychodynamic psychotherapy for avoidant personality disorder. Psychotherapy 42:494–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloane RB (1969) The converging paths of behavior therapy and psychotherapy. Am J Psychiatry 125:877–885

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sloane RB, Staples FR, Cristol AH, Yorkston N, Whipple K (1975) Psychotherapy vs behavior therapy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stiles WB (1988) Psychotherapy process-outcome correlations may be misleading. Psychotherapy 25:27–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strupp HH (1973) On the basic ingredients of psychotherapy. J Consult Clin Psychol 41:1–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tracey TJ, Lichtenberg JW, Goodyear RK, Claiborn CD, Wampold BE (2003) Concept mapping of therapeutic common factors. Psychother Res 13:401–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tschacher W, Junghan UM, Pfammatter M (2012) Towards a taxonomy of common factors in psychotherapy—results of an expert survey. Clin Psychol Psychother 21(1):82–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wachtel PL (2009) The evolving investigation of therapeutic change principles. Appl Prev Psychol 13:30–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wampold BE (2001) The great psychotherapy debate: models, methods, and findings. Erlbaum, Lawrence

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson JC, Kalogerakos F (2010) The therapeutic alliance in humanistic psychotherapy. In: Muran JC, Barber JP (eds) The therapeutic alliance: an evidence-based guide to practice. Guilford, New York, pp 191–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger J (1995) Common factors aren’t so common: the common factors dilemma. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 2:45–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger J, Rasco C (2007) Empirically supported common factors. In: Hofmann SG, Weinberger J (eds) The art and science of psychotherapy. Routledge, New York, pp 103–129

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew A. McAleavey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McAleavey, A.A., Castonguay, L.G. (2015). The Process of Change in Psychotherapy: Common and Unique Factors. In: Gelo, O., Pritz, A., Rieken, B. (eds) Psychotherapy Research. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1382-0_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1382-0_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-1381-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-1382-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics