A new Approach to Muscle Fatigue Evaluation for Push/Pull Task

  • Ruina Ma
  • Damien Chablat
  • Fouad Bennis
Conference paper
Part of the CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 544)


Pushing/Pulling tasks is an important part of work in many industries. Usually, most researchers study the Push/Pull tasks by analyzing different posture conditions, force requirements, velocity factors, etc. However few studies have reported the effects of muscle fatigue. Fatigue caused by physical loading is one of the main reasons responsible for MusculoSkeletal Disorders (MSD). In this paper, muscle groups of articulation is considered and from joint level a new approach is proposed for muscle fatigue evaluation in the arms Push/Pull operations. The objective of this work is to predict the muscle fatigue situation in the Push/Pull tasks in order to reduce the probability of MSD problems for workers. A case study is presented to use this new approach for analyzing arm fatigue in Pushing/Pulling.


Muscle Group Muscle Fatigue Joint Level Push Operation Elbow Level 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. T. H. Badi and A. A. Boushaala. Effect of one-handed pushing and pulling strength at different handle heights in vertical direction. Engineering and Technology, page 47, 2008.Google Scholar
  2. D. B. Chaffin, G. B. J. Andersson, and B. J. Martin. Occupational Biomechanics. John Wiley and Sons, Inc, third edition, 1999.Google Scholar
  3. Y. Giat, J. Mizrahi, and M. Levy. A musculotendon model of the fatigue profiles of paralyzed quadriceps muscle under fes. IEEE transactions on biomedical engineering, 40(7):664–674, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. W Khalil and E Dombre. Modelling, identification and control of robots. Hermes Science Publications, 2002.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. B. P. Klein, R. C. Jensen, and L. M. Sanderson. Assessment of workers’ compensation claims for back strains/sprains. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 26(6):443–448, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. J. Z. Liu, R. W. Brown, and G.H. Yue. A dynamical model of muscle activation, fatigue, and recovery. Biophysical journal, 82(5):2344–2359, May 2002. ISSN 0006-3495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. L. Ma, D. Chablat, F. Bennis, and W. Zhang. A new simple dynamic muscle fatigue model and its validation. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39(1):211 – 220, 2009. ISSN 0169-8141.Google Scholar
  8. A. Mital, P. Kopardekar, and A. Motorwala. Isokinetic pull strengths in the vertical plane: effects of speed and arm angle. Clinic Biomechanics, 10(2):110–112, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Division of Biomedical and Behavioral Science. Work practices guide for manual lifting. DHHS publication, no. (NIOSH) 81-122, 1981.Google Scholar
  10. A. S. Wexler, J. Ding, and S. A. Binder-Macleod. A mathematical model that predicts skeletal muscle force. IEEE transactions on biomedical engineering, 44(5):337–348, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© CISM, Udine 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruina Ma
    • 1
  • Damien Chablat
    • 1
  • Fouad Bennis
    • 1
  1. 1.AkronFrance

Personalised recommendations