Advertisement

Wrench Recovery of Parallel Manipulators for Full Retrieval of Subtasks

  • Vahid Nazari
  • Leila Notash
Part of the CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 544)

Abstract

In this paper, the wrench recovery of parallel manipulators after actuator failure is investigated. To achieve the desired wrench capability, the mobile platform task is divided into the recoverable and non-recoverable subtasks. The presented work is based on the projection of the lost wrench due to total or partial actuator failure onto the range space of the reduced Jacobian matrix. The force/torque of the healthy joints is adjusted such that the secondary goal comprising the 2-norm of the error of non-recoverable wrench and the 2-norm of the vector of the overall forces/torques of the healthy joints is minimized without affecting the recovered components of the wrench.

Keywords

Parallel Manipulator Mobile Platform Secondary Goal Range Space Prismatic Joint 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. R.G. Roberts and A.A. Maciejewski. A local measure of fault tolerance for kinematically redundant manipulators. IEEE Trans. Rob. and Auto., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 543-553, Aug 1996.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. L. Notash. A Methodology for Actuator Failure Recovery in Parallel Manipulators. Mech. and Mach. Theory, vol.46, pp.454-465, 2011.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. L. Notash. Motion Recovery after Joint Failure in Parallel Manipulators. CCToMM Symp. Mech., Mach., and Mechatronics., Montreal, June 2011.Google Scholar
  4. R.S. Jamisola, Jr, A.A. Maciejewski and R.G. Roberts. Failure tolerant path planning for the PA-10 robot operating amongst obstacles. IEEE Int. Conf. Rob. and Auto., vol. 5, pp. 4995-5000, New Orleans, Apr 2004.Google Scholar
  5. R.S. Jamisola, Jr, A.A. Maciejewski and R.G. Roberts. A Path Planning Strategy for Kinematically Redundant Manipulators Anticipating Joint Failures in the Presence of Obstacles. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intelligent Rob. and Syst., vol.1, pp. 142-148, Las Vegas, Oct 2003.Google Scholar
  6. T. Yoshikawa. Analysis and Control of Robot Manipulators with Redundancy. The 1st Int. Symp. Rob. Res., ed. M. Brady and R. Paul, MIT Press, pp.735-747, 1984.Google Scholar
  7. Y. Chen, J.E. McInroy and Y.Yi. Optimal, Fault-Tolerant Mappings to Achieve Secondary Goals without Compromising Primary Performance. IEEE Trans. Rob. and Auto., vol.19, no.4, pp. 680-691, Aug 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. L.W. Tsai. Robot Analysis: The Mechanics of Serial and Parallel Manipulators. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1999.Google Scholar
  9. K.L. Doty, C. Melchiorri, and C. Bonivento. A theory of generalized inverse applied to robotics. Int. J. Rob. Res., vol. 12, no. 1, pp.119, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. E. Papadopoulos, K. Vlachos, D. Mitropoulos. Design of a 5-dof haptic simulator for urological operations. IEEE Int. Conf. Rob. and Auto., vol.2, pp. 2079-2084, Washington, Aug 2002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© CISM, Udine 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vahid Nazari
    • 1
  • Leila Notash
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Queens UniversityKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations