Skip to main content

Constraint and Dynamic Analysis of Compliant Mechanisms with a Flexible Multibody Modelling Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Multibody System Dynamics, Robotics and Control
  • 4023 Accesses

Abstract

The models used in the conceptual phase of the mechatronic design should not be too complicated, yet they should capture the dominant system behaviour. Firstly, the awareness and possibly the avoidance of an overconstrained condition is important. Secondly, the models should reveal the system’s natural frequencies and mode shapes in a relevant frequency range. For the control system synthesis the low frequent behaviour up to the cross-over frequency needs to be known. Furthermore, the closed-loop system can be unstable due to parasitic modes at somewhat higher frequencies.

In this chapter the applicability of a multibody modelling approach based on non-linear finite elements is demonstrated for the mechatronic design of a compliant six DOF manipulator. A kinematic analysis is applied to investigate the exact constrained design of the system. From dynamic models the natural frequencies and mode shapes are predicted and a state-space model is derived that describes the system’s input-output relations. The models have been verified with experimental identification and closed-loop motion experiments. The predicted lowest natural frequencies and closed-loop performance agree sufficiently well with the experimental data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Blanding DL (1999) Exact constraint: machine design using kinematic principles. ASME Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hale LC (1999) Principles and techniques for designing precision machines. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Livermore

    Google Scholar 

  3. Soemers HMJR (2010) Design principles for precision mechanisms. T-point print, Enschede

    Google Scholar 

  4. van Dijk J, Aarts RGKM, Jonker JB (2012) Analytical one parameter method for PID motion controller settings. In: IFAC conference on advances in PID control – PID’12, Brescia, 28–30 Mar 2012

    Google Scholar 

  5. Xu JX (2008) New lead compensator designs for control education and engineering. In: Proceedings of 27th Chinese control conference, 16–18 July 2008

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aarts RGKM, van Dijk J, Jonker JB (2009). Efficient analyses for the mechatronic design of mechanisms with flexible joints undergoing large deformations. In: ECCOMAS thematic conference multibody dynamics 2009, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, June 29–July 2

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aarts RGKM, van Dijk J, Jonker JB (2010) Flexible multibody modelling for the mechatronic design of compliant mechanisms. In: The 1st joint international conference on multibody system dynamics, Lappeenranta, 25–27 May 2010

    Google Scholar 

  8. Aarts RGKM, van Dijk J, Brouwer DM, Jonker JB (2011) Application of flexible multibody modelling for control synthesis in mechatronics. In: Multibody dynamics 2011, ECCOMAS thematic conference, Brussels, 4–7 July 2011

    Google Scholar 

  9. Aarts RGKM, Boer SE, Meijaard JP, Brouwer DM, Jonker JB (2011) Analyzing overconstrained design of compliant mechanisms. In: Proceedings of ASME 2011 international design engineering technical conference & computers and information in engineering conference – IDETC/CIE 2011, Washington, DC, 28–31 Aug 2011

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jonker JB, Meijaard JP (2009) Definition of deformation parameters for the beam element and their use in flexible multibody system analysis. In: ECCOMAS thematic conference multibody dynamics 2009, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, June 29–July 2

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jonker JB, Aarts RGKM, van Dijk J (2009) A linearized input-output representation of flexible multibody systems for control synthesis. Multibody Syst Dyn 21(2):99–122

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Brouwer DM, de Jong BR, Soemers HMJR (2010) Design and modeling of a six DOF’s MEMS-based precision manipulator. Precis Eng 34(2):307–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Meijaard JP, Brouwer DM, Jonker JB (2010) Analytical and experimental investigation of a parallel leaf spring guidance. Multibody Syst Dyn 23(1):77–97

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Boer SE, Aarts RGKM, Brouwer DM, Jonker JB (2010) Multibody modelling and optimization of a curved hinge flexure. In: The 1st joint international conference on multibody system dynamics, Lappeenranta, 25–27 May 2010

    Google Scholar 

  15. Spijksma SA (2010) Analysis and MIMO control of a 6 DOFs parallel kinematic precision manipulator. M.Sc. thesis, Report number Wa-1293, University of Twente, Enschede

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nijsse G (2006) A subspace based approach to the design, implementation and validation of algorithms for active vibration isolation control. PhD thesis, University of Twente, Enschede

    Google Scholar 

  17. van Overschee P, de Moor B (1994) N4SID: subspace algorithms for the identification of combined deterministic-stochastic systems. Automatica 30(1):75–93

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author acknowledges the contributions from Steven Boer, Dannis Brouwer, Johannes van Dijk, Ben Jonker and Jaap Meijaard to the design, modelling and control as outlined in this chapter. Martijn Huijts and Sytze Spijksma are acknowledged for the design, analysis and testing of the manipulator.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. G. K. M. Aarts .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

Aarts, R.G.K.M. (2013). Constraint and Dynamic Analysis of Compliant Mechanisms with a Flexible Multibody Modelling Approach. In: Gattringer, H., Gerstmayr, J. (eds) Multibody System Dynamics, Robotics and Control. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1289-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1289-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-1288-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-1289-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics