Abstract
Applications of multibody dynamics or control to human mobility, impact biomechanics, ergonomics or health and medical cases require that reliable models of human body, including all relevant anatomical segments and a representation of the musculoskeletal system, are developed. The system state variables are available either to a control algorithm or to appraise the internal forces or even to evaluate performance indexes associated to the particular task. Here, a biomechanical model of the human body is presented and applied to demonstrate the basic modeling requirements. A strategy for the control of the biomechanical model motion, based on a distributed hierarchical control, is proposed. The biomechanical model is used to study zero momentum maneuvers, such as those of an astronaut in space or of a high-platform diver. Recognizing that the internal driving forces in the human body result from the musculoskeletal system and not from torque actuators, a procedure to evaluate the muscle forces is presented. Muscle activation dynamics models and optimization techniques are part of the proposed methodology. A human locomotion task demonstrate the procedure and to show the relation between muscle forces and the joint torques used in the control model.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Ambrósio J, Lopes G, Silva M (1999) Reconstruction of the spatial motion of biomechanical systems by means of computer vision and multibody dynamics. In: Kecskemethy A, Schneider M, Woernle C (eds) Advances in multibody systems and mechatronics, Technische Univ. Graz, Institute fur Mechanik und Getriebelehere, Austria, pp 407–426
Zielinska T (2004) Biological aspects of locomotion. In: Pfeiffer F, Zielinska T (eds) Walking: biological and technological aspects. Springer, Wien, pp 1–29
Silva M, Ambrósio J, Pereira M (1997) Biomechanical model with joint resistance for impact simulation. Multibody Syst Dyn 1:65–84
Sandell N, Varaiya P, Athans M, Safonov M (1978) Survey of decentralized control methods for large scale systems. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 23(2):108–128
Tsai D, Arabyan A (1991) Decentralized and hierarchical control of articulated multibody systems. Technical Report CAEL-91-2, Computer-Aided Engineering Laboratory, Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
Russel S, Norvig P (1995) Artificial intelligence, a modern approach. Prentice Hall, Englewood-Cliffs
Garriott OK (2011) Conservation Laws in Zero G, ST0046; Opportunities in zero gravity, ST0046, Textbook Tapes, Inc. http://www.textbooktapes.com
Kane TR, Headrick MR, Yatteau JD (1972) Experimental investigation of an astronaut maneuvering scheme. J Biomech 5:313–320
Kane TR, Scher MP (1970) Human self-rotating by means of limb maneuvers. J Biomech 3:39–49
Seireg A, Arvikar R (1989) Biomechanical analysis of the musculoskeletal structure for medicine and sports. Hemisphere, New York
Buchanan TS, Shreeve DA (1996) An evaluation of optimization techniques for the prediction of muscle activation patterns during isometric tasks. J Biomech Eng 118:565–574
Tsirakos D, Baltzopoulos V, Bartlett R (1997) Inverse optimization: functional and physiological considerations related to the force-sharing problem. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 25(4–5):371–407
Crowninshield R, Brand R (1981) Physiologically based criterion of muscle force prediction in locomotion. J Biomech 14(11):793–801
Ambrósio J, Kecskeméthy A (2007) Multibody dynamics of biomechanical models for human motion via optimization. In: Orden JC et al (eds) Computational multibody dynamics. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 245–272
Rodrigo S, Ambrósio J, Silva M, Penisi O (2008) Analysis of human gait based on multibody formulations and optimization tools. Mech Based Des Struct Mach 36(4):446–477
Nikravesh P (1988) Computer-aided analysis of mechanical systems. Prentice Hall, Englewood-Cliffs
Silva M, Ambrósio J (2002) Kinematic data consistency in the inverse dynamic analysis of biomechanical systems. Multibody Syst Dyn 8:219–239
Ambrósio J, Silva M (2007) Methodologies for forward and inverse dynamic analysis of the biomechanics of human motion. In: Gonzalez Y, Cerrolaza M (eds) Bioengineering modeling and computer simulation. CIMNE, Barcelona, pp 13–33
Ambrósio J (2009) Human spatial attitude control by means of zero momentum turns. Int J Comput Vis Biomech 2(2):171–176
Kuo B (1995) Automatic control systems. Prentice Hall, Englewood-Cliffs
Silva M, Gonçalves J (1995) APOLLO, 3D dynamic analysis of mechanisms. IDMEC, Instituto Superior Técnico, Portugal
Winter DA (1990) Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. John Wiley & Sons, New York
Silva M, Ambrósio J (2003) Solution of the redundant muscle forces in human locomotion with multibody dynamics and optimization tools. Mech Based Des Struct Mech 31(3):381–411
Ambrósio J, Silva M (2005) A biomechanical multibody model with a detailed locomotion muscle apparatus. In: Ambrósio J (ed) Advances in computational multibody systems. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 155–184
Yamaguchi G (2001) Dynamic modeling of musculoskeletal motion. Kluwer Academic, Boston
Garner BA, Pandy MG (2001) Musculoskeletal model of the upper limb based on the visible human male dataset. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 4(2):93–126
Quental C, Folgado J, Ambrósio J, Monteiro J (2012) Dynamic analysis of a multibody system of the upper limb. Multibody Syst Dyn, 28(1-2):83–108. DOI 10.1007/s11044-011-9297-0
Zajac F (1989) Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 17(4):359–411
Winters J (1995) Concepts in neuromuscular modelling. In: Allard P, Stokes I, Blanchi JP (eds) Three-dimensional analysis of human movement. Human Kinetics, Champaign
Strobach D, Kecskeméthy A, Steinwender G, Zwick B (2005) A simplified approach for rough identification of muscle activation profiles via optimization and smooth profile patches. In: Goicolea J et al (eds) Proceedings of multibody dynamics 2005, ECCOMAS thematic conference, Madrid, Spain, 21–24 June 2005, pp 1–17
Tsirakos D, Baltzopoulos V, Bartlett R (1997) Inverse optimization: functional and physiological considerations related to the force-sharing problem. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 25(4–5):371–407
Umberger BR, Gerritsen KGM, Martin PE (2003) A model of human muscle energy expenditure. Comput Methods Biomech Biomech Eng 6(2):99–111
Schiehlen W, Ackerman M (2005) Estimation of metabolical costs for human locomotion. In: Proceedings of ASME international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference 2005, Technical Paper DETC2005-842229, Long Beach, CA, 24–28 Sep 2005
Czaplicki A, Silva M, Ambrósio J, Jesus O, Abrantes J (2006) Estimation of the muscle force distribution in ballistic motion based on multibody methodology. Comput Methods Biomech Biomech Eng 9(1):45–54
Czaplicki A, Silva M, Ambrósio J (2004) Biomechanical modelling for whole body motion using natural coordinates. J Theor Appl Mech 42(4):927–944
Vanderplaats G (1999) DOT – Design Optimization Tools – Users Manual – Version 5.0
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Wien
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ambrosio, J.A.C. (2013). Multibody Dynamics Approaches to Biomechanical Applications to Human Motion Tasks. In: Gattringer, H., Gerstmayr, J. (eds) Multibody System Dynamics, Robotics and Control. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1289-2_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1289-2_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-1288-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-1289-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)