Abstract
Objective: The supremacy of low-pressure valves (LPV) in the therapy of patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) has been proven by the Dutch NPH study. The downside of LPVs is the high rate of overdrainage complications. In the meantime gravitational units have been developed with the objective of minimising overdrainage complications. Do these gravitational units allow the same favourable outcomes as in the Dutch NPH study without overdrainage complications? The goal of this prospective randomised controlled multicentre trial is to compare the rate of overdrainage complications after shunt surgery with programmable valves with or without a gravitational unit.
Method: Patients suspected with iNPH with gait ataxia and one or two other symptoms of Hakim’s triad and enlarged ventricles on CT or MRI underwent a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) infusion test, CSF tap test and/or continuous ICP measurement in seven experienced centres. If iNPH was diagnosed the patients were randomised to receive a ventriculoperitoneal shunt with a programmable valve with or without a gravitational unit. The patients were followed up for 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. The primary hypothesis of the study was that programmable valves with gravitational units will reduce the rate of overdrainage from 25% to 10%. The outcome measured by iNPH-specific outcome scales (Kiefer score, Black grading scale) and the generic quality of life (short form 12, SF12) was defined as the secondary endpoint. To detect the hypothesised difference in the incidence of overdrainage with a type I error of 5% and a type II error of 20%, correcting for multiple testing and an anticipated drop-out rate of 10%, we planned to enrol 250 patients. To ensure safety and efficacy we performed a planned interim analysis halfway.
Results: The study design has been found to be effective with regard to the primary hypothesis.
Conclusion: The design of the SVASONA study was developed to be able to confirm the primary hypothesis. Thus, the method of the study should solve the dilemma of the Dutch NPH study by the randomised comparison of LPVs with and without gravitational units.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Greitz D (2007) Paradigm shift in hydrocephalus research in the legacy of Dandy’s pioneering work: rationale for third ventriculostomy in communicating hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst 23(5):487–489
Boon AJ, Tans JT, Delwel EJ, Egeler-Peerdeman SM, Hanlo PW, Wurzer HA et al (1998) Dutch normal-pressure hydrocephalus study: randomized comparison of low- and medium-pressure shunts. J Neurosurg 88(3):490–495
Meier U, Kiefer M, Sprung C (2004) Evaluation of the Miethke dual-switch valve in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus. Surg Neurol 61(2):119–127
Lemcke J, Meier U (2010) Improved outcome in shunted iNPH with a combination of a Codman Hakim programmable valve and an Aesculap-Miethke ShuntAssistant. Cen Eur Neurosurg 71(3):113–116
Meier U, Lemcke J (2006) First clinical experiences in patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus with the adjustable gravity valve manufactured by Aesculap (proGAV(Aesculap)). Acta Neurochir Suppl 96:368–372
Meier U, Bartels P (2001) The importance of the intrathecal infusion test in the diagnostic of normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Eur Neurol 46(4):178–186
Tans JT, Boon AJ (2002) How to select patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus for shunting. Acta Neurochir Suppl 81:3–5
Boon AJ, Tans JT, Delwel EJ, Egeler-Peerdeman SM, Hanlo PW, Wurzer HA et al (2000) The Dutch normal-pressure hydrocephalus study. How to select patients for shunting? An analysis of four diagnostic criteria. Surg Neurol 53(3):201–207
Boon AJ, Tans JT, Delwel EJ, Egeler-Peerdeman SM, Hanlo PW, Wurzer HA et al (1999) Dutch normal-pressure hydrocephalus study: the role of cerebrovascular disease. J Neurosurg 90(2):221–226
Boon AJ, Tans JT, Delwel EJ, Egeler-Peerdeman SM, Hanlo PW, Wurzer JA et al (1998) Does CSF outflow resistance predict the response to shunting in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus? Acta Neurochir Suppl 71:331–333
Boon AJ, Tans JT, Delwel EJ, Egeler-Peerdeman SM, Hanlo PW, Wurzer HA et al (1997) Dutch normal-pressure hydrocephalus study: prediction of outcome after shunting by resistance to outflow of cerebrospinal fluid. J Neurosurg 87(5):687–693
Oikonomou J, Aschoff A, Hashemi B, Kunze S (1999) New valves – new dangers? 22 valves (38 probes) designed in the ‘nineties in ultralong-term tests (365 days)’. Eur J Pediatr Surg 9(Suppl 1):23–26
Aschoff A, Kremer P, Benesch C, Fruh K, Klank A, Kunze S (1995) Overdrainage and shunt technology. A critical comparison of programmable, hydrostatic and variable-resistance valves and flow-reducing devices. Childs Nerv Syst 11(4):193–202
Brean A, Eide PK (2008) Prevalence of probable idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus in a Norwegian population. Acta Neurol Scand 118(1):48–53
Conflicts of interest statement
The study has been conducted as an investigator-initiated trial and has been monitored by the centre of clinical research ukb, represented by DS. All participants have received grants per enrolled patient from B. Braun Aesculap, Melsungen, Germany.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag/Wien
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lemcke, J. et al. (2012). On the Method of a Randomised Comparison of Programmable Valves with and Without Gravitational Units: The SVASONA Study. In: Schuhmann, M., Czosnyka, M. (eds) Intracranial Pressure and Brain Monitoring XIV. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum, vol 114. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0956-4_48
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0956-4_48
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-0955-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-0956-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)