Skip to main content

Automated Extraction of Decision Rules for Predicting Lumbar Drain Outcome by Analyzing Overnight Intracranial Pressure

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Intracranial Pressure and Brain Monitoring XIV

Part of the book series: Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum ((NEUROCHIRURGICA,volume 114))

Abstract

Background: Extended lumbar drain (ELD) has become a popular pre-shunt workup test to help diagnose normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH). Unfortunately, this procedure requires a substantial time investment for both the family and hospital. In this study, we investigate how accurate the prediction of ELD outcome can be achieved by using simple decision rules automatically derived from pulse morphological metrics of overnight ICP recordings. Our ultimate goal is to test the hypothesis that overnight ICP monitoring, empowered by subsequent signal analysis, could be an alternative to ELD.

Methods: The present study involved 54 patients with both ELD and overnight ICP recordings; the ICP morphological analysis was performed using the MOCAIP algorithm. Furthermore, the distribution of individual metric from the overnight recording was characterized using five aggregation functions (features). Then an algorithm was developed to automatically discover the most accurate “if-then” decision rule for each of the five feature functions. In addition, the best combination of two decision rules, either using “AND” or “OR” operator, was obtained.

Findings: Rules based on five individual feature functions achieved an accuracy of 70.4%, 72.2%, 74.1%, 72.2%, and 79.6% respectively. However, “OR” combination of two features improved accuracy to 88.9%.

Conclusion: We showed an algorithm to discover decision rules that can potentially predict ELD outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Governale LS et al (2008) Techniques and complications of external lumbar drainage for normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 63(4 Suppl 2):379–384; discussion 384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Walchenbach R et al (2002) The value of temporary external lumbar CSF drainage in predicting the outcome of shunting on normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 72(4):503–506

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Marmarou A et al (2005) Diagnosis and management of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: a prospective study in 151 patients. J Neurosurg 102(6):987–997

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Marmarou A et al (2005) The value of supplemental prognostic tests for the preoperative assessment of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 57(3 Suppl):S17–S28; discussion ii–v

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Raftopoulos C et al (1992) Morphological quantitative analysis of intracranial pressure waves in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurol Res 14(5):389–396

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Eide PK, Sorteberg W (2010) Diagnostic intracranial pressure monitoring and surgical management in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a 6-year review of 214 patients. Neurosurgery 66(1):80–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stephensen H et al (2005) Objective B wave analysis in 55 patients with non-communicating and communicating hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76(7):965–970

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Woodworth GF et al (2009) Cerebrospinal fluid drainage and dynamics in the diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 64(5):919–925; discussion 925–926

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Eide PK (2006) A new method for processing of continuous intracranial pressure signals. Med Eng Phys 28(6):579–587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hu X et al (2009) Morphological clustering and analysis of continuous intracranial pressure. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 56(3):696–705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hu X et al (2010) Intracranial pressure pulse morphological features improved detection of decreased cerebral blood flow. Physiol Meas 31:679–695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kasprowicz M et al (2010) Pattern recognition of overnight intracranial pressure slow waves using morphological features of intracranial pressure pulse. J Neurosci Methods 190(2):310–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zong W, Mark R (2003) An open-source algorithm to detect onset of arterial blood pressure pulses. Comput Cardiol 30:259–262

    Google Scholar 

  14. Scalzo F et al (2009) Regression analysis for peak designation in pulsatile pressure signals. Med Biol Eng Comput 47(9):967–977

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Scalzo F et al (2008) Random subwindows for robust peak recognition in intracranial pressure signals. Lect Notes Comput Sci 5358:370–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Eide PK, Brean A (2010) Cerebrospinal fluid pulse pressure amplitude during lumbar infusion in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus can predict response to shunting. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res 7:5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

A PCT application was filed by UCLA for the pulse morphology analysis algorithm used in this work. The present work is partially supported by NINDS grants NS059797, NS054881, and NS066008.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiao Hu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hu, X., Hamilton, R., Baldwin, K., Vespa, P.M., Bergsneider, M. (2012). Automated Extraction of Decision Rules for Predicting Lumbar Drain Outcome by Analyzing Overnight Intracranial Pressure. In: Schuhmann, M., Czosnyka, M. (eds) Intracranial Pressure and Brain Monitoring XIV. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum, vol 114. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0956-4_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0956-4_40

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-0955-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-0956-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics