Advertisement

Eshelby’s Technique for Analyzing Inhomogeneities in Geomechanics

  • John W. Rudnicki
Part of the CISM Courses and Lectures book series (CISM, volume 533)

Abstract

This chapter describes Eshelby’s technique for determining the stress and strain in regions in an infinite elastic body that undergo a change of size or shape. The technique is also extended to determine the stress and strain in regions of different elastic properties than the surroundings due to loading in the farfield. The chapter also discusses the relation of this technique to singular solutions in elasticity and different integral forms for the solutions. Example applications of the technique include determining the effective stress in a narrow fault zone, the stress and strain in a fluid reservoir and subsidence due to fluid mass injection or withdrawal. The approach of Eshelby is also used as a basis for a brief description of representations of deformation due to slip and seismic source theory.

Keywords

Fault Zone Pore Pressure Stress Path Transformation Strain Point Force 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Aki, K. and P.G. Richards (1980). Quantitative Seismology Vol. 1. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  2. Cocco, M. and J.R. Rice (2002). Pore pressure and poroelasticity effects in Coulomb stress analysis of earthquake interactions. J. Geophys. Res. 107(B2), 10.1029/2000JB000138.Google Scholar
  3. Eshelby, J.D. (1957). The determination of the elastic field of an ellipsoidal inclusion and related problems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 241, 376–396.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eshelby, J.D. (1961). Elastic inclusions and inhomogeneities. In Progress in Solid Mechanics Vol. 2, edited by I.N. Sneddon and R. Hill, pp. 87–140, North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  5. Geertsma, J. (1957). A remark on the analogy between thermoelasticity and the elasticity of saturated porous media. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 6, 13–16.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Geertsma, J. (1966). Problems of rock mechanics in petroleum engineering. In Proc. 1st Congr. Int. Soc. Rock Mechanics Vol. 1, 585–594, National Laboratory of Civil Engineering, Lisbon.Google Scholar
  7. Geertsma, J. (1973). Land subsidence above compacting oil and gas reservoirs. J. Petrol. Technology 25, 734–744.Google Scholar
  8. Geertsma, J. (1973a). A basic theory of subsidence due to reservoir compaction: The homogeneous case. Verh. Kon. Ned. Geol. Mijnbouwk. Gen. 28, 43–62.Google Scholar
  9. Holt, R. M., O. Flornes, L. Li, and E. Fjær (2004). Consequences of depletion-induced stress changes on reservoir compaction and recovery. In Rock Mechanics Across Borders and Disciplines, Proceedings of Gulf Rocks 2004, the 6th North American Rock Mechanics Symposium, Paper No. 589.Google Scholar
  10. Kostrov, B.V. (1970). The theory of the focus for tectonic earthquakes. Izv. Earth Physics 4, 84–101.Google Scholar
  11. Kostrov, B.V. and S. Das (1988). Principles of Earthquake Source Mechanics. Cambridge Monographs on Mechanics and Applied Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  12. Lehner, F. K., J. K. Knoglinger, and F. D. Fischer (2005). Use of a Maysel integral representation for solving poroelastic inclusion problems. In Thermal Stresses 2005, Proc. 6th Int. Congr. on Thermal Stresses, May 26–29, 2005, Vienna, Austria, edited by F. Ziegler, R. Heuer, and C. Adam, pp. 77–80, Schriftenreihe der TU Wien.Google Scholar
  13. Love, A.E.H. (1944). A Treatise on the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity, 4th edition. Dover Publications, New York. Republication of 4th (1927) edition published by Cambridge University Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Maysel, V.M. (1941). A generalization of the Betti-Maxwell theorem to the case of thermal stresses and some of its applications (in Russian). Dokl. Acad. Nauk. USSR 30, 115–118.Google Scholar
  15. Mindlin, R.D. (1955). Force at a point in the interior of a semi-infinite solid. In Proc. 1st Midwestern Conf. Solid Mechanics, pp. 56–59.Google Scholar
  16. Mindlin, R.D. (1936). Force at a point in the interior of a semi-infinite solid. Physics 7, 195–202.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mindlin, R.D. and D.H. Cheng (1950). Nuclei of strain in the semi-infinite solid. J. Appl. Physics 21, 926–933.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mossop, A. and P. Segall (1997). Subsidence at The Geysers geothermal field, N. California from a comparison of GPS and leveling surveys. Geophys. Res. Lett. 24(14), 1839–1842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mulders, F.M.M. (2003). Modelling of Stress Development and Fault Slip in and Around a Producing Gas Reservoir. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  20. Mura, T. (1987). Micromechanics of Defects in Solids, 2nd revised edition. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nowacki, W. (1986). Thermoelasticity, 2nd edition. PWN-Polish Scientific Publishers, Warsaw; Pergamon Press, Oxford.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Okada, Y. (1992). Internal deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space. Bull. Seismological Society of America 82, 1018–1040.Google Scholar
  23. Paterson, M. and T.-f. Wong (2005). Experimental Rock Deformation: The Brittle Field, 2nd edition. Springer-Verlag, Berlin etc.Google Scholar
  24. Rice, J.R. (1977). Pore pressure effects in inelastic constitutive formulations for fissured rock masses. In Advances in Civil Engineering through Engineering Mechanics, pp. 360–363. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Rice, J.R. (1980). The mechanics of earthquake rupture. In Physics of the Earth’s Interior (International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi”, Course 78, 1979) edited by A.M. Dziewonski and E. Boschi, pp. 555–649, North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  26. Rice, J.R. and M.P. Cleary (1976). Some basic stress diffusion solutions for fluid-saturated elastic porous media with compressible constituents. Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics 14, 227–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rudnicki, J.W. (1977). The inception of faulting in a rock mass with a weakened zone. J. Geophys. Res. 82, 844–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rudnicki, J.W. (2002a). Alteration of regional stress by reservoirs and other inhomogeneities: Stabilizing or destabilizing? In Proc. 9th Int. Congr. Rock Mechanics Vol. 3, Paris, Aug. 25–29, 1999, edited by G. Vouille and P. Berest, pp. 1629–1637, Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  29. Rudnicki, J.W. (2002b). Eshelby transformations, pore pressure and fluid mass changes, and subsidence. In Poromechanics II, Proc. 2nd Biot Conf. on Poromechanics, Grenoble, Aug. 26–28, edited by J.-L. Auriault, C. Geindreau, P. Royer, J.-F. Bloch, C. Boutin, and J. Lewandowska, pp. 307–312, Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  30. Segall, P. (1985). Stress and subsidence resulting from subsurface fluid withdrawal in the epicentral region of the 1983 Coalinga earthquake. J. Geophys. Res. 90, 6801–6816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Segall, P. (1989). Earthquakes triggered by fluid extraction. Geology 17, 942–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Segall, P. (1992). Induced stresses due to fluid extraction from axisymmetric reservoirs. Pure and Applied Geophysics 139, 535–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Segall, P., J.-R. Grasso, and A. Mossop (1994). Poroelastic stressing and induced seismicity near the Lacq gas field, southwestern France. J. Geophys. Res. 99, 15,423–15,438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Segall, P. (2010). Earthquake and Volcano Deformation. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  35. Sokolnikoff, S. (1956). Mathematical Theory of Elasticity, 2nd edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. Steketee, J. A. (1958). Some geophysical applications of the elasticity theory of dislocations. Canadian Journal of Physics 36, 1168–1198.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Teufel, L.W., D. W. Rhett, and H. E. Farrell (1991). Effect of reservoir depletion and pore pressure drawdown on in situ stress and deformation in the Ekofisk field, North Sea. In Proc. 32nd U.S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics, pp. 63–72, Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  38. Timoshenko, S.P. and J. N. Goodier. Theory of Elasticity, 3rd edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  39. Walsh, J. B. (2002). Subsidence above a planar reservoir. J. Geophys. Res. 107(B9), doi:10.1029/2001JB000606.Google Scholar
  40. Wang, H. F. (2000). Theory of Linear Poroelasticity with Applications to Geomechanics and Hydrology, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© CISM, Udine 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • John W. Rudnicki
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Department of Mechanical EngineeringNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA

Personalised recommendations