Abstract
In the early years of sphincter saving surgery for rectal cancer, an anorectal remnant of at least 6 cmseemed to be necessary for a satisfactory continence. Especially the sensory function of the lower rectum was assumed to be essential for a good postoperative function [1]. Gaston [2] has shown that after extensive resection of the rectum the rectoanal reflex was absent and continence was impaired. He showed on patients with rectal anastomoses in various levels that a minimum of 7 cm of rectal stump was necessary to elicit the rectoanal reflex, demonstrating an intact afferent and efferent nerve supply. His work showed very clearly that the lower rectum is an integral part of the sphincter mechanism. Although further clinical experience with different kinds of sphincter saving procedures did not confirm that a small rectal stump leads to incontinence, the important interaction between the lower rectum, the anal canal and the sphincter muscles is still valid.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Goligher JC (1951) The functional results after sphinctersaving resections of the rectum. Ann Roy Coll Surg Engl 8: 421–439
Gaston EA (1948) Fecal continence following resections of various portions of the anal sphincters. Surg Gyn Obstet 87: 669–678
Parks AG (1982) Resection and sutured colo-anal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 69: 301–304
Engel J, Kerr J, Schlesinger-Raab A, Eckel R, Sauer H, Hölzel D (2003) Quality of life in rectal cancer patients. Ann Surg 238: 203–213
Grumann MM, Noack EM, Hoffmann IA, Schlag PM (2001) Comparison of quality of life in patients undergoing abdominoperineal extirpation or anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 233: 149–156
Lazorthes F, Fages P, Chiotasso P, Lemozy J, Bloom E (1986) Resection of the rectum with construction of a colonic reservoir and colo-anal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 73: 136–138
Parc R, Tiret E, Frileux P, Moszkowsky E, Loygue J (1986) Resection and colo-anal anastomosis with colonic reservoir for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 73: 139–141
Harris GJC, Lavery IJ, Fazio VW(2002) Reasons for failure to construct the colonic J-pouch. What can be done to improve the size of the neorectal reservoir should it occur? Dis Colon Rectum 45: 1304–1308
Zgraggen K, Maurer CA, Mettler D, Stoupis C, Wildi S, Büchler M (1999) A novel colon pouch and its comparison with a straight coloanal and colon J-pouch-anal anastomosis: preliminary results in pigs. Surgery 125: 105–112
Fürst A. Suttner S, Ayman A, Beham A, Jauch KW (2003) Colonic J-pouch vs. coloplasty following resection of distal rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 46: 1161–1166
Huber F, Herter B, Siewert JR (1998) Colonic pouch vs. side to end anastomosis in low anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 42: 896–902
Machado M, Nygren J, Goldman S, Ljungquist O (2003) Similar outcome after colonic pouch and side to end anastomosis for rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 238:203–214
Fazio VW, Zutschi M, Remzi HF, Parc Y, Ruppert R, Fürst A, Celebrezze J, Galandiuk S, Orangio G, Hyman N, Bokey L, Tiret E, Kirchdorfer B, Medich D, Tietze M, Hull T, Hammel J (2007) A randomized trial to compare long-term functional outcome, quality of life and complications of surgical procedures for low rectal cancers. Ann Surg 246: 481–490
Hodgson J (1974) Transverse taeniamyotomy. A new surgical approach for diverticular disease. Ann Royal Coll Surg Engl 55: 80–89
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag/Wien
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schiessel, R. (2012). Do we need a pouch after intersphincteric resection?. In: Schiessel, R., Metzger, P. (eds) Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Tumors. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0929-8_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0929-8_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-0928-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-0929-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)