Skip to main content

Do we need a pouch after intersphincteric resection?

  • Chapter
Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Tumors
  • 1194 Accesses

Abstract

In the early years of sphincter saving surgery for rectal cancer, an anorectal remnant of at least 6 cmseemed to be necessary for a satisfactory continence. Especially the sensory function of the lower rectum was assumed to be essential for a good postoperative function [1]. Gaston [2] has shown that after extensive resection of the rectum the rectoanal reflex was absent and continence was impaired. He showed on patients with rectal anastomoses in various levels that a minimum of 7 cm of rectal stump was necessary to elicit the rectoanal reflex, demonstrating an intact afferent and efferent nerve supply. His work showed very clearly that the lower rectum is an integral part of the sphincter mechanism. Although further clinical experience with different kinds of sphincter saving procedures did not confirm that a small rectal stump leads to incontinence, the important interaction between the lower rectum, the anal canal and the sphincter muscles is still valid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Goligher JC (1951) The functional results after sphinctersaving resections of the rectum. Ann Roy Coll Surg Engl 8: 421–439

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gaston EA (1948) Fecal continence following resections of various portions of the anal sphincters. Surg Gyn Obstet 87: 669–678

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Parks AG (1982) Resection and sutured colo-anal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 69: 301–304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Engel J, Kerr J, Schlesinger-Raab A, Eckel R, Sauer H, Hölzel D (2003) Quality of life in rectal cancer patients. Ann Surg 238: 203–213

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Grumann MM, Noack EM, Hoffmann IA, Schlag PM (2001) Comparison of quality of life in patients undergoing abdominoperineal extirpation or anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 233: 149–156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lazorthes F, Fages P, Chiotasso P, Lemozy J, Bloom E (1986) Resection of the rectum with construction of a colonic reservoir and colo-anal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 73: 136–138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Parc R, Tiret E, Frileux P, Moszkowsky E, Loygue J (1986) Resection and colo-anal anastomosis with colonic reservoir for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 73: 139–141

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Harris GJC, Lavery IJ, Fazio VW(2002) Reasons for failure to construct the colonic J-pouch. What can be done to improve the size of the neorectal reservoir should it occur? Dis Colon Rectum 45: 1304–1308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zgraggen K, Maurer CA, Mettler D, Stoupis C, Wildi S, Büchler M (1999) A novel colon pouch and its comparison with a straight coloanal and colon J-pouch-anal anastomosis: preliminary results in pigs. Surgery 125: 105–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fürst A. Suttner S, Ayman A, Beham A, Jauch KW (2003) Colonic J-pouch vs. coloplasty following resection of distal rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 46: 1161–1166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Huber F, Herter B, Siewert JR (1998) Colonic pouch vs. side to end anastomosis in low anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 42: 896–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Machado M, Nygren J, Goldman S, Ljungquist O (2003) Similar outcome after colonic pouch and side to end anastomosis for rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 238:203–214

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fazio VW, Zutschi M, Remzi HF, Parc Y, Ruppert R, Fürst A, Celebrezze J, Galandiuk S, Orangio G, Hyman N, Bokey L, Tiret E, Kirchdorfer B, Medich D, Tietze M, Hull T, Hammel J (2007) A randomized trial to compare long-term functional outcome, quality of life and complications of surgical procedures for low rectal cancers. Ann Surg 246: 481–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hodgson J (1974) Transverse taeniamyotomy. A new surgical approach for diverticular disease. Ann Royal Coll Surg Engl 55: 80–89

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rudolf Schiessel MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schiessel, R. (2012). Do we need a pouch after intersphincteric resection?. In: Schiessel, R., Metzger, P. (eds) Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Tumors. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0929-8_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0929-8_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-0928-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-0929-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics