Semantic Management of Digital Contents for the Cultural Domain

  • Carlos M. CornejoEmail author
  • Iván Ruiz-Rube
  • Juan Manuel Dodero


The World Wide Web is a space prepared for the exchange of information among networked systems. However, the current web is mainly designed for human consumption, so its contents are not readily understandable by computers. This issue emerges in diverse applications of the Web and becomes especially relevant in the cultural institutions’ domain. The aim of Linked Data methods [6] is to extend the published data on the Web so that web analyzing agents are able to process and interpret the semantic metadata of a given domain. All issues related to cooperation, interoperability and accessibility enabled by semantic technologies are growing up to have linked, well represented knowledge domains ready for exploitation by automated agents. By endowing the web with more meaning, you provide solutions to share, process and transfer information among web-based contents and applications from diverse cultural institutions.


Cultural Heritage Link Data Content Management System Application Ontology Semantic Metadata 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This work has been sponsored by a grant from the ASCETA project (P09-TIC-5230) of the Andalusian Government, Spain.


  1. 1.
    Adida, B., Hausenblas, M.: Rdfa use cases: Scenarios for embedding rdf in html. World Wide Web Consortium, Working Draft WD-xhtml-rdfa-scenarios-20070330 (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Auer, S., Bizer, C., Kobilarov, G., Lehmann, J., Cyganiak, R., Ives, Z.: Dbpedia: A nucleus for a web of open data. In: Aberer, K., et al. (eds.) Proc. of (ISWC+ASWC 2007), vol. 4825, chap. 52, pp. 722–735 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Auer, S., Lehmann, J.: What have innsbruck and leipzig in common? extracting semantics from wiki content. In: ESWC. pp. 503–517 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bekiari, C., Charami, L., Georgis, C., Kritsotaki, A.: Documenting cultural heritage in small museums. In: Annual Conference of CIDOC. Athens, Greece (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bekiari, C., Doerr, M., Constantopoulos, P.: Information patterns for digital cultural repositories [electronic version]. ERCIM News 66, pp. 30–31 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berners-Lee, T.: World-wide computer. Commun. ACM 40(2), 57–58 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bizer, C., Lehmann, J., Kobilarov, G., Auer, S., Becker, C., Cyganiak, R., Hellmann, S.: DBpedia-A crystallization point for the Web of Data. Web Semant. Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 7(3), 154–165 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bollacker, K., Cook, R., Tufts, P.: Freebase: a shared database of structured general human knowledge. In: AAAI’07: Proc. of the 22nd national conference on Artificial intelligence. pp. 1962–1963 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bollacker, K., Evans, C., Paritosh, P., Sturge, T., Taylor, J.: Freebase: a collaboratively created graph database for structuring human knowledge. In: SIGMOD ’08: Proc. of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data. pp. 1247–1250 (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brodaric, B., Reitsma, F., Qiang, Y.: Skiing with dolce: toward an e-science knowledge infrastructure. In: Proc. of the 2008 conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems. pp. 208–219 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Doerr, M., Bekiari, C., LeBoeuf, P.: Frbroo, a conceptual model for performing arts. In: Proc. of ICOM-CIDOC Annual Meeting. Museum Benaki Athens, Greece (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Doerr, M., Iorizzo, D.: The dream of a global knowledge network—a new approach. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 1(1), 1–23 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    García-Barriocanal, E., Sicilia, M.A.: On linking cultural spaces and e-tourism: An ontology-based approach. In: The Open Knowlege Society. A Computer Science and Information Systems Manifesto. pp. 694–701 (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl. Acquis. 5, pp. 199–220 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hajmoosaei, A., Kareem, S.A.: An approach for mapping of domain-based local ontologies. In: CISIS. pp. 865–870 (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hausenblas, M., Bailer, W., Mayer, H.: Deploying Multimedia Metadata in Cultural Heritage on the Semantic Web. In: First International Workshop on Cultural Heritage on the Semantic Web, collocated with ISWC’07, Busan, South Korea (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hirsch, C., Grundy, J., Hosking, J.: Thinkbase: A visual semantic wiki. In: ISWC’08 (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hunter, J.: Combining the cidoc crm and mpeg-7 to describe multimedia. In Museums, Museums on the Web (2002)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Krtzsch, M., Vr, D., Vlkel, M.: Semantic mediawiki. In: Proc. 5th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC06). pp. 935–942 (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mena, E., Kashyap, V., Illarramendi, A., Sheth, A.: Domain specific ontologies for semantic information brokering on the global information infrastructure (1998)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Niles, I., Pease, A.: Towards a standard upper ontology. In: FOIS ’01: Proceedings of the international conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems. pp. 2–9 (2001)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Noy, N.F.: Semantic integration: a survey of ontology-based approaches. ACM Sigmod Record 33(4), 65–70 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pan, F., Hobbs, J.: Time in owl-s. In: In Proceedings of AAAI Spring Symposium on Semantic Web Services. Stanford University, CA (2004)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pérez, J., Arenas, M., Gutierrez, C.: Semantics and complexity of sparql. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 34(3), 1–45 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pinto, H.S., Martins, Jo.aP.: A methodology for ontology integration. In: K-CAP ’01: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Knowledge capture. pp. 131–138 (2001)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ronchi, A.M.: eCulture, Cultural Content in the Digital Age. Springer, Erewhon, NC (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ruiz-Rube, I., Cornejo, C., Dodero, J., Garcia, V.M.: Development Issues on Linked Data Weblog Enrichment. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Metadata and Semantic Research. pp. 235–246 (2010)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Saha, G.K.: Web ontology language (owl) and semantic web. Ubiquity 8(35), 1–1 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Vienna 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlos M. Cornejo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Iván Ruiz-Rube
    • 1
  • Juan Manuel Dodero
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Languages and Systems DepartmentUniversity of CadizCadizSpain

Personalised recommendations