Skip to main content

Chirurgische Therapie der koronaren Herzkrankheit

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Zusammenfassung

Die chirurgische Behandlung der koronaren Herzkrankheit (KHK) wird immer komplexer und erfordert zunehmend sorgfältig abgewogene Entscheidungen und präzise Planung. Die offene Operation steht in direkter Konkurrenz zu den Verfahren der perkutanen Koronarinterventionen (percutaneous coronary intervention, PCI), gegenwärtig werden nur noch etwa 10–20 % aller koronaren Reperfusionseingriffe (coronary artery bypass grafting, CABG) chirurgisch durchgeführt. Dennoch stellt die CABG in den meisten herzchirurgischen Kliniken die am häufigsten durchgeführte Operation dar. Chirurgen müssen sich aber mehr denn je mit konzeptuellen Entwicklungen beschäftigen und das für den Patienten individuell optimale Vorgehen auch im interdisziplinären Team evaluieren. Ähnlich den in den 1960er-Jahren eingeführten Tumorboards hat sich ein funktionierendes Heart Team zur Qualitätsverbesserung und Patientenversorgung bewährt und wird auch von den Guidelines gefordert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Alam M, Bandeali SJ, Kayani WT, Ahmad W, Shahzad SA, Jneid H et al (2013) Comparison by meta-analysis of mortality after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in women versus men. Am J Cardiol 112:309–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ali E, Saso S, Ashrafian H, Athanasiou T (2010) Does a skeletonized or pedicled left internal thoracic artery give the best graft patency? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 10:97–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Assmann A, Boeken U, Akhyari P, Lichtenberg A (2012) Appropriate timing of coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 60:446–451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Athanasiou T, Saso S, Rao C, Vecht J, Grapsa J, Dunning J, Lemma M, Casula R (2011) Radial artery versus saphenous vein conduits for coronary artery bypass surgery: forty years of competition – which conduit offers better patency? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 40:208–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Attia T, Koch CG, Houghtaling PL, Blackstone EH, Sabik EM, Sabik JF (2017) Does a similar procedure result in similar survival for women and men undergoing isoltaed coronary artery bypass grafting? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 153:571–579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann A, Funkat AK, Lewandowski J, Frie M, Ernst M, Hekmat K et al (2015) Cardiac surgery in Germany during 2014: a report on behalf of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 63:258–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bisleri G, Giroletti L, Hrapkowicz T, Bertuletti M, Zembala M, Arieti M, Muneretto C (2016) Five-year clinical outcome of endoscopic versus open radial artery harvesting: a propensity score analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 102:1253–1259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonaros N, Schachner T, Kofler M, Lehr E, Lee J, Vesely M et al (2014) Advanced hybrid closed chest revascularization: an innovative strategy for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 46:e94–e102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonzel T, Schächinger V, Dörge H (2016) Description of a Heart Team approach to coronary revascularization and its beneficial long-term effect on clinical events after PCI. Clin Res Cardiol 105:388–400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Botman CJ, Schonberger J, Koolen S, Penn O, Botman H, Dib N, Eeckhout E, Pijls N (2007) Does stenosis severity of native vessels influence bypass graft patency? A prospective fractional flow reserve-guided study. Ann Thorac Surg 83:2093–2097

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braunwald E (1989) Unstable angina. A classification. Circulation 80:410–414

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braxton JH, Hammond GL, Letsou GV, Franco KL, Kopf GS, Elefteriades JA, Baldwin JC (1995) Optimal timing of coronary artery bypass graft surgery after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 92:II66–II68

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caceres M, Weiman DS (2013) Optimal timing of coronary artery bypass grafting in acute myocardial infarction. Ann Thorac Surg 95:365–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X (2015) The benefits of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting require careful patient selection and special expertise. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 150:735–736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deppe AC, Arbash W, Kuhn EW, Slottosch I, Scherner M, Liakopoulos OJ, Choi YH, Wahlers T (2016) Current evidence of coronary artery bypass grafting off-pump versus on-pump: a systematic review with meta-analysis of over 16,900 patients investigated in randomized controlled trials. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 49:1031–1041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Desai ND, Cohen EA, Naylor CD, Fremes SE, Radial Artery Patency Study Investigators (2004) A randomized comparison of radial-artery and saphenous-vein coronary bypass grafts. N Engl J Med 351:2302–2309

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diegeler A, Börgermann J, Kappert U, Breuer M, Böning A, Ursulescu A, GOPCABE Study Group et al (2013) Off-pump versus on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting in elderly patients. N Engl J Med 368:1189–1198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dodge JT Jr, Brown BG, Bolson EL, Dodge HT (1992) Lumen diameter of normal human coronary arteries. Influence of age, sex, anatomic variation, and left ventricular hypertrophy or dilation. Circulation 86:232–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fu SP, Zheng Z, Yuan X, Zhang SJ, Gao HW, Li Y, Hu SS (2009) Impact of off-pump techniques on sex differences in early and late outcomes after isolated coronary artery bypass grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 87:1090–1096

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaudino M, Crea F, Cammertoni F, Mazza A, Toesca A, Massetti M (2014) Morpho-functional features of the radial artery: implications for use as a coronary bypass conduit. Ann Thorac Surg 98:1875–1879

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaudino M, Crea F, Cammertoni F, Massetti M (2015) The radial artery: a forgotten conduit. Ann Thorac Surg 99:1479–1485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaudino M, Tondi P, Benedetto U, Milazzo V, Flore R, Glieca F, Ponziani FR, Luciani N, Girardi LN, Crea F, Massetti M (2016) Radial artery as a coronary artery bypass conduit: 20-year results. J Am Coll Cardiol 68:603–610

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaudino M, Puskas JD, Di Franco A, Ohmes LB, Iannaccone M, Barbero U et al (2017) Three arterial grafts improve late survival: a meta-analysis of propensity-matched studies. Circulation 135:1036–1044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geleijnse ML, Krenning BJ, Soliman OI, Nemes A, Galema TW, ten Cate FJ (2007) Dobutamine stress echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery disease in women. Am J Cardiol 99:714–717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez JA, Lipinski MJ, Flors L, Shaw PW, Kramer CM, Salerno M (2015) Meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of coronary computed tomography angiography, computed tomography perfusion, and computed tomography-fractional flow reserve in functional myocardial ischemia assessment versus invasive fractional flow reserve. Am J Cardiol 116:1469–1478

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan A, Chiasson M, Buth K, Hirsch G (2005) Women have worse long-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting than men. Can J Cardiol 21:757–762

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • He GW, Taggart DP (2016a) Antispastic management in arterial grafts in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 102(2):659–668

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • He GW, Taggart DP (2016b) Spasm in arterial grafts in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 101:1222–1229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Head SJ, Kieser TM, Falk V, Huysmans HA, Kappetein AP (2013) Coronary artery bypass grafting: part 1-the evolution over the first 50 years. Eur Heart J 34:2862–2872

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Head SJ, Davierwala PM, Serruys PW, Redwood SR, Colombo A, Mack MJ et al (2014) Coronary artery bypass grafting vs. percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with three-vessel disease: final five-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial. Eur Heart J 35:2821–2830

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hemal K, Pagidipati NJ, Coles A, Dolor RJ, Mark DB, Pellikka PA et al (2016) Sex differences in demographics, risk factors, presentation, and noninvasive testing in stable outpatients with suspected coronary artery disease: insights from the PROMISE trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 9:337–346

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hiteshi AK, Li D, Gao Y, Chen A, Flores F, Mao SS, Budoff MJ (2014) Gender differences in coronary artery diameter are not related to body habitus or left ventricular mass. Clin Cardiol 37:605–609

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kamiya H, Akhyari P, Martens A, Karck M, Haverich A, Lichtenberg A (2008) Sternal microcirculation after skeletonized versus pedicled harvesting of the internal thoracic artery: a randomized study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 135:32–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kappetein AP, Feldman TE, Mack MJ, Morice MC, Holmes DR, Ståhle E et al (2011) Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with drug-eluting stenting for the treatment of left main and/or three-vessel disease: 3-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial. Eur Heart J 32:2125–2134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiani S, Poston R (2011) Is endoscopic harvesting bad for saphenous vein graft patency in coronary surgery? Curr Opin Cardiol 26:518–522

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kim C, Redberg RF, Pavlic T, Eagle KA (2007) A systematic review of gender differences in mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery and percutaneous coronary interventions. Clin Cardiol 30:491–495

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kolh P, Windecker S, Alfonso F, Collet JP, Cremer J, Falk V et al (2014) 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J 35:2541–2619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kolh P, Kurlansky P, Cremer J, Lawton J, Siepe M, Fremes S (2016) Transatlantic editorial: a comparison between European and North American guidelines on myocardial revascularization. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 152:304–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalewski M, Pawliszak W, Malvindi PG, Bokszanski MP, Perlinski D, Raffa GM et al (2016) Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting improves short-term outcomes in high-risk patients compared with on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 151:60–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuralay E (2009) Massive systemic air embolism during off-pump coronary artery surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 35:183–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lakhter V, Alkhouli M, Zack CJ, Zhao H, Cohen HA, O’Neill BP, O’Murchu B, Bove AA, Bashir R (2017) Sex differences in fractional flow reserve-guided revascularization: a nationwide analysis. J Women’s Health (Larchmt) 26:109–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamy A, Devereaux PJ, Prabhakaran D, Taggart DP, Hu S, Paolasso E, CORONARY Investigators et al (2013) Effects of off-pump and on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting at 1 year. N Engl J Med 368:1179–1188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton JS (2011) Sex and gender differences in coronary artery disease. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 23:126–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR, Bittl JA, Cercek B, Chambers CE et al (2016) 2015 ACC/AHA/SCAI focused update on primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: an update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention and the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Circulation 133:1135–1147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luckraz H, Norell M, Buch M, James R, Cooper G (2015) Structure and functioning of a multidisciplinary „Heart Team“ for patients with coronary artery disease: rationale and recommendations from a joint BCS/BCIS/SCTS working group. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 48:524–529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Markman PL, Rowland MA, Leong JY, Van Der Merwe J, Storey E, Marasco S, Negri J, Bailey M, Rosenfeldt FL (2010) Skeletonized internal thoracic artery harvesting reduces chest wall dysesthesia after coronary bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139:674–679

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin LM, Holmes SD, Henry LL, Schlauch KA, Stone LE, Roots A, Hunt SL, Ad N (2012) Health-related quality of life after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery and the role of gender. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 13:321–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milojevic M, Head SJ, Parasca CA, Serruys PW, Mohr FW, Morice MC, Mack MJ et al (2016) Causes of death following PCI versus CABG in complex CAD: 5-year follow-up of SYNTAX. J Am Coll Cardiol 67:42–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miwa S, Desai N, Koyama T, Chan E, Cohen EA, Fremes SE, Radial Artery Patency Study Investigators (2006) Radial artery angiographic string sign: clinical consequences and the role of pharmacologic therapy. Ann Thorac Surg 81:112–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr FW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, Feldman TE, Ståhle E, Colombo A, Mack MJ et al (2013) Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial. Lancet 381:629–638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moshkovitz Y, Raanani E (2016) The art of saphenous vein grafting and patency maintenance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 151:300–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini F, Vezzani A, Fortuna D, Contini GA, Pacini D, Gabbieri D et al (2016) Gender differences in outcomes following isolated coronary artery bypass grafting: long-term results. J Cardiothorac Surg 11:144

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • van Nunen LX, Zimmermann FM, Tonino PA, Barbato E, Baumbach A, Engstrøm T et al (2015) FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guidance of PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (FAME): 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 386:1853–1860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2015) Health at a glance 2015: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pawliszak W, Kowalewski M, Raffa GM, Malvindi PG, Kowalkowska ME, Szwed KA et al (2016) Cerebrovascular events after no-touch off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, conventional side-clamp off-pump coronary artery bypass, and proximal anastomotic devices: a meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 5:e002802

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Plass CA, Podesser BK, Prusa AM (2010) Effect of blower-mister devices on vasoreactivity of coronary artery bypass grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 140:923–927

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Puskas JD, Sadiq A, Vassiliades TA, Kilgo PD, Lattouf OM (2012) Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting is associated with significantly improved long-term survival, even among diabetic patients. Ann Thorac Surg 94:710–715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Puskas JD, Halkos ME, DeRose JJ, Bagiella E, Miller MA, Overbey J et al (2016) Hybrid coronary revascularization for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease: a multicenter observational study. J Am Coll Cardiol 68:356–365

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Quin J, Lucke J, Hattler B, Gupta S, Baltz J, Bishawi M et al (2014) Surgeon judgment and utility of transit time flow probes in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. JAMA Surg 149:1182–1187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Repossini A, Tespili M, Saino A, Kotelnikov I, Moggi A, Di Bacco L, Muneretto C (2013) Hybrid revascularization in multivessel coronary artery disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 44:288–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblum JM, Harskamp RE, Hoedemaker N, Walker P, Liberman HA, de Winter RJ, Vassiliades TA, Puskas JD, Halkos ME (2016) Hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass surgery with bilateral or single internal mammary artery grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 151:1081–1089

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sá MP, Ferraz PE, Escobar RR, Vasconcelos FP, Ferraz AA, Braile DM, Lima RC (2013) Skeletonized versus pedicled internal thoracic artery and risk of sternal wound infection after coronary bypass surgery: meta-analysis and meta-regression of 4817 patients. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 16:849–857

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sá MP, Ferraz PE, Escobar RR, Nunes EO, Lustosa P, Vasconcelos FP, Lima RC (2014) Patency of skeletonized versus pedicled internal thoracic artery in coronary bypass graft surgery: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. Int J Surg 12:666–672

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sá MP, Cavalcanti PE, Santos HJ, Soares AF, Miranda RG, Araújo ML, Lima RC (2015) Flow capacity of skeletonized versus pedicled internal thoracic artery in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 48:25–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schachner T, Nagele G, Kacani A, Laufer G, Bonatti J (2004) Factors associated with presence of ascending aortic atherosclerosis in CABG patients. Ann Thorac Surg 78:2028–2032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schachner T, Feuchtner GM, Bonatti J, Bonaros N, Oehlinger A, Gassner E et al (2007) Evaluation of robotic coronary surgery with intraoperative graft angiography and postoperative multislice computed tomography. Ann Thorac Surg 83:1361–1367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schachner, T (2019) Mechanische Komplikationen beim akuten Myokardinfarkt.Wien klin Mag https://doi.org/10.1007/s00740-019-0293-y

  • Smith T, Kloppenburg GT, Morshuis WJ (2014) Does the use of bilateral mammary artery grafts compared with the use of a single mammary artery graft offer a long-term survival benefit in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 18:96–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stanger O (2004) Herzchirurgie. In: Rieder A, Lohff B (Hrsg) Gender Medizin. Geschlechtsspezifische Aspekte für die klinische Praxis, 2. Aufl. Springer, Wien, S 357–388, 1. Aufl. 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanger O, Unger F (2006) Surgical treatment of coronary multivessel disease. Exp Rev Cardiovasc Dis 4:569–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suma H (2013) Gastroepiploic artery graft in coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2:493–498

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Taggart DP, Altman DG, Gray AM, Lees B, Nugara F, Yu LM, Flather M, ART Investigators (2015) Effects of on-pump and off-pump surgery in the Arterial Revascularization Trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 47:1059–1065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Takagi H, Umemoto T, All-Literature Investigation of Cardiovascular Evidence (ALICE) Group (2014) Worse long-term survival after off-pump than on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 148:1820–1829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van’ t Veer M, FAME Study Investigators et al (2009) Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 360:213–224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Toth G, De Bruyne B, Casselman F, De Vroey F, Pyxaras S, Di Serafino L et al (2013) Fractional flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation 128:1405–1411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vaccarino V, Lin ZQ, Kasl SV, Mattera JA, Roumanis SA, Abramson JL, Krumholz HM (2003a) Gender differences in recovery after coronary artery bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 41:307–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vaccarino V, Lin ZQ, Kasl SV, Mattera JA, Roumanis SA, Abramson JL, Krumholz HM (2003b) Sex differences in health status after coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation 108:2642–2647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Son JA, Smedts F, Yang CQ et al (1997) Morphometric study of the right gastroepiploic and inferior epigastric arteries. Ann Thorac Surg 63:709–715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss ES, Chang DD, Joyce DL, Nwakanma LU, Yuh DD (2008) Optimal timing of coronary artery bypass after acute myocardial infarction: a review of California discharge data. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 135:503–511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • White HD, Assmann SF, Sanborn TA, Jacobs AK, Webb JG, Sleeper LA et al (2005) Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results from the Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock (SHOCK) trial. Circulation 112:1992–2001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Zhou J, Li H, Liu Z, Chen A, Zhao Q (2014) Comparison of graft patency between off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: an updated meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 97:1335–1341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Schachner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schachner, T., Stanger, O. (2020). Chirurgische Therapie der koronaren Herzkrankheit. In: Stanger, O. (eds) Kompendium der modernen Herzchirurgie beim Erwachsenen. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0451-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0451-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-0450-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-0451-4

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics