Skip to main content

Music and the outer space — the Means of universal communication or a form of art?

  • Chapter
Humans in Outer Space — Interdisciplinary Perspectives

Part of the book series: Studies in Space Policy ((STUDSPACE,volume 5))

  • 1355 Accesses

Abstract

Studying music in outer space entails perceiving music in two prevailing perspectives: treating music as a form of artistic expression and as a means of communication (although this is not a uniquely human phenomenon as many animal species use sounds for interacting).The first understanding of music as a form of art is also deeply immersed in futurologist speculations concerning the expansion of music and is based on contemporary trends reflecting the musicological state of the art. The second outlook (connected with tendencies to rethink the process of musical signification)396 directly refers to the historical attempts to answer the basic question: what is music and why, as well as consequently how, music — understood as a communication tool — could be employed as a universal language system in space exploration. This perspective corresponds with musicological assumptions of researching the past development of musical styles rooted in methodological practices established in the 19th century historically oriented discipline initially called Musikwissenschaft.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Feld, Steven. “Communication, Music, and Speech about Music.” Yearbook for Traditional Music 16 (1984): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dale, Ralph Alan. “The Future of Music: An Investigation into the Evolution of Forms.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 26.4 (1968): 477–488. 477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Risset, Jean-Claude. “Computing Musical Sound.” Mathematics and Music. A Diderot Mathematical Forum. Eds. Gerard Assayag, Hans Georg Feichtinger, and Jose Francisco Rodrigues. Berlin-New York: Springer, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wilson, Stephen. Information Arts: Intersection of Art, Science, and Technology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Miranda, Eduardo R. and Tikhanoff, Vadim. “Musical Composition by an Autonomous Robot: An Approach to AIBO Interaction.” Proceedings of TAROS 2005 — Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems, 12–14 September, 2005, London, UK. Plymouth: Faculty of Technology, University of Plymouth. 19 June 2009. http://cmr.soc.plymouth.ac.uk/publications/MirandaTikhanoff_robot_music.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jones, Daniel, Tim Hogson, Jane Grant, John Matthias, Nicholas Outram, and Nick Ryan. “The Fragmented Orchestra.” Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on New Instruments for Musical Expression (NIME’09). 4–9 June 2009, Pittsburgh, PI, USA. 25 Aug. 2009. http://cmr.soc.plymouth.ac.uk/publications/NIME_09.pdf.

  8. Miranda, Eduardo R. and Drouet, E. “Evolution of Musical Lexicons by Singing Robots.” Proceedings of TAROS 2006 Conference — Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems, 4–6 September 2006, Surrey University, Gilford (UK). 25 Aug. 2009. http://cmr.soc.plymouth.ac.uk/publications/Miranda_TAROS06.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Miranda, Eduardo Reck. “On the evolution of music in a society of self-taught digital creatures.” Digital Creativity 14.1 (2003): 29–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Coutinho, Eduardo, Marcelo Gimenes, Joao M. Martins, and Miranda, Eduardo Reck. “Computational Musicology: An Artificial Life Approach.” Plymouth: School of Computing, Communications & Electronics University of Plymouth. 26 Aug. 2009. http://cmr.soc.plymouth.ac.uk/publications/ComputationalMusicology.pdf.

  11. Seeger, Charles. “Music as a Tradition of Communication Discipline and Play.” Ethnomusicology 6.3 (1962): 156–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schetsche, Michael T. “Encounters among the stars — Exosociological consideration.” (in this volume).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Music and Mathematics, from Pythagoras to Fractals. Eds. John Fauvel, Raymond Flood and Robin Wilson. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Portnoy, Julius. The Philosopher and Music. A Historical Outline. New York: Da Capo Press, 1980: 148.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gajewski, Boleslas. “Grammar of Soleresol or the Universal Language of François Sudre.” 27 Aug. 2009. http://mozai.com/writing/not_mine/solresol/.

  16. for example Führer durch den Konzertsaal (Guide through the concert hall) by Herman Kretzschmar (1848-1924).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Heinrich Schenker. Free composition. New York: Longman, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rom Harré. “Is there a semantics for music.” The Interpretation of music: philosophical essays. Ed. Michael Krausz. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993: 103–121.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Eero Tarasti. A theory of musical semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Leonard B. Meyer. Style and music: theory, history, and ideology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mathieses, Thomas J. “Greek Music Theory.” The Cambridge History of Western Music Theory. Ed. Thomas Christensen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004: 109–135.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Herlinger, Jan. “Medieval Canonics.” The Cambridge History of Western Music Theory. Ed. Thomas Christensen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004: 168–192.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ibid. 169.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Enrico Fubini. History of music aesthetics. Translated by Michael Hatwell. London: Macmillan, 1990: 72–76.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gouk, Penelope. “Role of Harmonics in the Scientific Revolution.” The Cambridge History of Western Music Theory. Ed. Thomas Christensen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004: 223–242. 229.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ibid. 233.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Ulrike Landfester Nina-Louisa Remuss Kai-Uwe Schrogl Jean-Claude Worms

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Piotrowska, A.G. (2011). Music and the outer space — the Means of universal communication or a form of art?. In: Landfester, U., Remuss, NL., Schrogl, KU., Worms, JC. (eds) Humans in Outer Space — Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Studies in Space Policy, vol 5. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0280-0_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0280-0_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-0279-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-0280-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics