Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Veröffentlichungen des Instituts Wiener Kreis ((WIENER KREIS,volume 16))

Abstract

In the natural sciences, the most interesting and relevant questions are the so-called why-questions. What is a why-question? A why-question is nothing else than a question in the form “Why P?” (or “Why is P true?”) where P is an arbitrary statement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Hajnal Andréka, Judit X. Madarász, and István Németi. “Logical axiomatizations of space-time. Samples from the literature”, in: Non-Euclidean geometries, volume 581 of Mathematics and Its Applications. New York: Springer, 2006, pp.155–185.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Hajnal Andréka, Judit X. Madarász, and István Németi, “Logic of space-time and relativity theory”, in: Marco Aiello, Ian Pratt-Hartmann and Johan van Benthem (Eds.), Handbook of Spatial Logics. Dordrecht: Springer, 2007, pp.607–711.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Hajnal Andréka, Judit X. Madarász, and István Németi, On the logical structure of relativity theories. Research report, Alfréd Rényi Institute of Mathematics, Budapest, 2002. With contributions from Attila Andai, Gábor Sági, Ildikó Sain and Csaba Tőke. http://www.math-inst.hu/pub/algebraic-logic/Contents.html. 1312 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hajnal Andréka, Judit X. Madarász, István Németi, and Gergely Székely, “Axiomatizing relativistic dynamics without conservation postulates”, in: Studia Logica 89, 2, 2008, pp. 163–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hajnal Andréka, Judit X. Madarász, István Németi, and Gergely Székely, Vienna Circle and Logical Analysis of Relativity Theory, in: this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Michael Friedman, “Explanation and Scientific Understanding”, in: The Journal of Philosophy 71, 1, 1974, pp.5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carl G. Hempel and Paul Oppenheim, “Studies in the Logic of Explanation”, in: Philosophy of Science 15, 2, 1948, pp.135–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jaakko Hintikka and Ilpo Halonen, “Semantics and Pragmatics for Why-Questions”, in: The Journal of Philosophy 92, 12, 1995, pp.636–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Judit X. Madarász. Logic and Relativity (in the light of definability theory). PhD thesis, Eötvös Loránd Univ., Budapest, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Judit X. Madarász. “Amalgamation and Interpolation; Pushing the limits.” Parts I–II, in: Studia Logica 61, 3, 1998, pp.311–345 and 62, 1, 1999, pp.1-19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Judit X. Madarász, István Németi, and Gergely Székely, “Twin paradox and the logical foundation of relativity theory”, in: Foundations of Physics 36, 5, 2006, pp.681–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Judit X. Madarász, István Németi, and Gergely Székely, “First-order logic foundation of relativity theories”, Dov Gabbay, Sergei Goncharov and Michael Zakharyaschev (Eds.), in: Mathematical problems from applied logic II. New York: Springer, 2007, pp.217–252.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Judit X. Madarász, István Németi, and Csaba Tőke, “On generalizing the logic-approach to space-time towards general relativity: first steps”, in: Vincent F. Hendricks, Fabian Neuhaus, Stig Andur Pedersen, Uwe Scheffler and Heinrich Wansing (Eds.), First-Order Logic Revisited. Berlin: Logos Verlag 2004, pp.225–268.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Judit X. Madarász, and Gergely Székely, Comparing Relativistic and Newtonian Dynamics in First-Order Logic, in: this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  15. David Sandborg, “Mathematical Explanation and the Theory of Why-Questions”, in: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 49, 4, 1998, pp.603–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gergely Székely, First-Order Logic Investigation of Relativity Theory with an Emphasis on Accelerated Observers. PhD thesis, Eötvös Loránd Univ., Budapest, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gergely Székely, “Geometrical characterization of the twin paradox and its variants”, submitted.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dennis Temple, “The Contrast Theory of Why-Questions”, in: Philosophy of Science 55, 1, 1988, pp.141–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

Székely, G. (2011). On Why-Questions in Physics. In: Máté, A., Rédei, M., Stadler, F. (eds) Der Wiener Kreis in Ungarn / The Vienna Circle in Hungary. Veröffentlichungen des Instituts Wiener Kreis, vol 16. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0177-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics