Skip to main content

Closure Options in a Duopoly with Strong Strategic Externalities

  • Chapter
Real Options

Part of the book series: ZfB-Ergänzungshefte ((ZFB))

Abstract

This paper examines exercise policies for closure options in a duopoly with uncertain (inverse) demand and strong strategic externalities. First, we consider a symmetric duopoly and contrast the resulting equilibrium exercise policies with the disinvestment behavior of a monopoly and of myopic firms. Second, the equilibria of the asymmetric duopoly model are derived and it is shown that the level of the demand uncertainty may affect the number of prevailing equilibria. Finally, the two main results that (a) duopolists disinvest later than a monopolist and earlier than myopic firms and that (b) an increase in market price volatility makes strategic externalities less important are discussed and related to the existing literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Dixit, A. K. and Pindyck, R. C. (1994): Investment Under Uncertainty, Princeton University Press. Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, C. H. and Li, L. (1989): Equilibrium Exit in Stochastically Declining Industries. In: Games and Economic Behavior 1, 40–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D. and Tirole, J. (1985): Preemption and Rent Equalization in the Adoption of New Technology. In: Review of Economic Studies 52, 383–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D. and Tirole, J. (1986): A Theory of Exit in Duopoly. In: Econometrica 54, 943–960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D. and Tirole, J. (1991): Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, P. and Nalebuff, B. (1985): Exit. In: RAND Journal of Economics 16, 184–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, P. and Nalebuff, B. (1990): The Devolution of Declining Industries. In: Quarterly Journal of Economics 105, 167–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grenadier, S. R. (1996): The Strategic Exercise of Options: Development Cascades and Overbuilding in Real Estate Markets. In: Journal of Finance 51, 1653–1679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, K., Weiss, A. and Wilson, C. (1988): The War of Attrition in Continuous Time with Complete Information. In: International Economic Review 29, 663–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe, H. C. (2000): Second-mover Advantages in the Strategic Adoption of New Technology under Uncertainty. In: International Journal of Industrial Organization 18, 315–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huisman, K. J. M. (2000): Technology Investment: A Game Theoretic Real Options Approach, Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huisman, K. J. M. and Kort, P. M. (1999): Effects of Strategic Interactions on the Option Value of Waiting. Working Paper, CentER, Tilburg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joaquin, D. C. and Butler, K. C. (1999): Competitive Investment Decisions — A Synthesis. In: Brennan, M. J. and Trigeorgis, L., eds. Project Flexibility, Agency, and Competition: New Developments in the Theory of Real Options. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khadem, V. and Perraudin, W. (2001): Default Hazards and the Term Structure of Credit Spreads in a Duopoly. Working Paper, Birkbeck College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambrecht, B. M. (2001): The Impact of Debt Financing on Entry and Exit in a Duopoly. In: Review of Financial Studies 14, 765–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikosch, T. (1998): Elementary Stochastic Calculus — with Finance in View. World Scientific, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murto, P. (2004): Exit in Duopoly Under Uncertainty. Forthcoming in RAND Journal of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitchik, C. (1981): Equilibria of a Two-Person Non-Zerosum Noisy Game of Timing. In: Int. Journal of Game Theory 10, 207–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smets, F. (1991): Exporting versus FDI: The Effect of Uncertainty, Irreversibilities and Strategic Interactions. Working Paper, Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparla, T. (2001): Strategic Real Options — with the German Electric Power Market in View. Dissertation, University of Dortmund. (See http://eldorado.uni-dortmund.de:8080/FB11/ls1/forschung/ 2001/Sparla).

  • Thijssen, J. J. J., Huisman, K. J. M. and Kort, P. M. (2002): Strategic Investment under Uncertainty and Information Spillovers. Working Paper, CentER, Tilburg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeds, H. (2002): Strategic Delay in a Real Options Model of RandD Competition. In: Review of Economic Studies 69, 383–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Thomas Dangl Michael Kopel Wolfgang Kürsten

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sparla, T. (2004). Closure Options in a Duopoly with Strong Strategic Externalities. In: Dangl, T., Kopel, M., Kürsten, W. (eds) Real Options. ZfB-Ergänzungshefte. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-12338-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-12338-5_5

  • Publisher Name: Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-409-03443-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-663-12338-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics