Skip to main content

Die elektronische Gruppe als soziales Netzwerk

  • Chapter
Virtuelle Gruppen

Zusammenfassung

Bei der Analyse sozialer Netzwerke wird die soziale Struktur als musterartige Anordnung der Netzwerkteilnehmer und ihrer Beziehungen erfasst. Ziel der Analyse ist es, grundlegende Strukturmuster zu beschreiben, ihren Einfluß auf andere Variablen zu erklären und Veränderungen der sozialen Strukturen zu erfassen. So wurden bei der Analyse sozialer Netzwerke Methoden zur Erfassung struktureller Muster und der Zusammenhänge zwischen unterschiedlichen Beziehungsmustern, zur Analyse der Implikationen die strukturelle Muster für das Verhalten von Netzwerkteilnehmern haben, sowie zur Untersuchung der Auswirkungen, die von den Merkmalen und sozialen Beziehungen der Teilnehmer auf die soziale Struktur der Netzwerke ausgehen, entwickelt. In den vergangenen drei Jahrzehnten hat die Netzwerkanalyse eine Reihe sozialwissenschaftlicher Konzepte, Erkenntnisse und Methoden hervorgebracht (vgl. Berkowitz, 1982; Wellman, 1988b; Scott, 1991; Wasserman, Faust, 1993). So konnten die Forscher die Bedeutung sozialer Netzwerke für die interpersonale Unterstützung (vgl. Wellman, 1992), die Struktur von Aufständen und anderen politischen Auseinandersetzungen (vgl. Tilly, 1984), die Verteilung und Ansiedlung von Migranten (vgl. Salaff, Fong, Wong, 1999), die Verknüpfung eigentlich unvereinbarer Mitarbeiter am Arbeitsplatz, sowie beim Zusammenschluß zunächst unabhängig erscheinender Organisationen (vgl. Nohria, Eccles, 1992) nachweisen.

Der Originalbeitrag ist erschienen in: Sara Kiesler (Hrsg.), 1997: Culture of the Internet. Mahwah, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum. Übersetzung und Abdruck mit freundlicher Genehmigung des Verlags.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • A. Abbott, 1988: The systems of professions: An Essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. P. Barlow, 1995: Is there a there in cyberspace?, in: Utne Sammelband, März-April. S. 50–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. P. Barlow, S. Birkets, S. Kelly, K., and Slouka, M., 1995: What are we doing on-line, in: Harpers, August. S. 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Bechar-Israeli, 1995: From Bonehead To cLonehEAd: Nicknames, Play, and Identity on Internet Relay Chat, in: Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 1, 2. Als Online-Dokument: http://www.usc.edu/dept/annenberg/voll/issue2/bechar.html

    Google Scholar 

  • S. D. Berkowitz, 1982: An introduction to structural analysis: The network approach to social research. Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Bikson, J. D. Eveland, 1990: The interplay of work group structures and computer support, in: J. Galegher, R. Kraut, C. Egido (Hrsg.): Intellectual teamwork: social and technological foundations of cooperative work. Hillsdale, NJ S. 245–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Borgatti, M. Everett, L. Freeman, 1994: UCINet4. Columbia, SC

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Bott, 1971: Family and social network. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Breiger, 1974: The duality of persons and groups, in: Social Forces, 53. S. 181–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Bristor, 1987: Buying networks: A model of positional influence in organizational buying. Unveröffentlichte Dissertation an der School of Business, Universität Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Burt, 1983: Range, in: R. Burt, M. Minor (Hrsg.): Applied network analysis. Beverly Hills, CA S. 176–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Burt, 1991: Structure 4.2. New York: Columbia Universität, Center for Social Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Burt, 1992: Structural holes. Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Buxton, 1991: Telepresence: Integrating shared task and personal spaces. Papier zur Groupware’ 91 Konferenz, Oktober 1991. Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Carley, 1990: Structural constraints on communication: The diffusion of the homophoric signal analysis technique through scientific fields, in: Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 15, 3–4. S. 207–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Carley, K. Wendt, 1991: Electronic mail and scientific communication, in: Knowledge, 12, 4. S. 406–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Constant, L. S. Sproull, S. Kiesler, 1996: The kindness of strangers: the usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice, in: Organization Science, 7, 2. S. 119–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Coupland, 1995: Microserfs. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Craven, B. Wellman, 1973: The network city, in: Sociological Inquiry, 43. S. 57–88. M. J. Culnan, M. L. Markus, 1987: Information technologies, in: F. Jablin, L. L. Putnam

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Roberts, L. Porter (Hrsg.): Handbook of organizational communication. Newbury

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, CA S. 420–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Danet, T. Wachenhauser, H. Bechar-Israeli, A. Cividalli, Y. Rosenbaum-Tamari, 1995: Curtain Time 20:00 GMT: Experiments in Virtual Theater on Internet Relay Chat, in: Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 1, 2. Als Online-Dokument: http://www.usc.edu/dept/annenberg/vol1/issue2/contents.html

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Dantowitz, B. Wellman, 1996: The small world of the Internet. Papier für die Tagung der Kanadischen Vereinigung der Soziologie and Anthropologie. St. Catherines, Ontario. Juni 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Dorsey, 1994: The force. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • V. Espinoza, 1999: Social networks among the urban poor. Inequality and integration in a Latin American city, in: B. Wellman (Hrsg.): Networks in the global village. Boulder, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • J. D. Eveland, T. Bikson, 1988: Work group structures and computer support, in: ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 6. S. 354–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Finholt, L. Sproull, 1990: Electronic groups at work, in: Organization Science, 1, 1. S. 41–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Finholt, L. Sproull, S. Kiesler, 1990: Communication and performance in ad hoc task groups, in: J. Galegher, R. Kraut, C. Egido (Hrsg.): Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work. Hillsdale, NJ. S. 291–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Fischer, 1984: The urban experience. Orlando, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. S. Furlong, 1989: An electronic community for older adults: The SeniorNet network, in: Journal of Communication, 39, 3. S. 145–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Galegher, R. Kraut, C. Egido (Hrsg.), 1990: Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work. Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Garton, 1995: An emprical analysis of desktop videoconferencing and other media in a spatially distributed work group. Center for Information Technology Innovation. Laval, Quebec.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Garton, B. Wellman, 1995: Social impacts of electronic mail in organizations: A review of the research literature, in: Communication yearbook, 18. S. 434–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Granovetter, 1973: The strength of weak ties, in: American Journal of Sociology, 78. S. 1360–1380.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Granovetter, 1982: The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited, in:

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Mardsen, N. Lin (Hrsg.): Social structure and network analysis. Beverly Hills, CA S. 105–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Granovetter, 1995: Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers. Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Haythornthwaite, B. Wellman, M. Mantei, 1995: Work relationships and media

    Google Scholar 

  • use: A social network analysis, in: Group Decision and Negotiation, 4, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. 193–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Haythornthwaite, B. Wellman, 1996a: Transforming ego-centered network data to whole network data. Universität von Toronto: Centre for Urban Community Studies. Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Haythornthwaite, B. Wellman, 1996b: Which kinds of network members communicate by email or face-to-face for what kinds of work? Universität von Toronto: Centre for Urban Community Studies. Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Herring, 1996: Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication, in: R. Kling (Hrsg.): Computerization and controversy. Zweite Auflage. San Diego, CA S. 476–489.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • S. R. Hiltz, K. Johnson, G. Agle, 1978: Replicationg Bales problem solving experiments on a computerized conference: A pilot study. Forschungsreport Nr. 8. New Jersey Institute of Technology: Computerized Conferenzing and Communications Center. Newark.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. R. Hiltz, K. Johnson, M. Turoff, 1986: Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences, in: Human Communication Research, 13, 2. S. 225–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. R. Hiltz, M. Turoff, 19932: The network nation. Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Johnson-Lenz, T. Johnson-Lenz, 1993: Community brain-mind: groupware tools for healthy civic life. Papier far die Healthy Communities Networking Summit, Dezember 1993. San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Kaufer, K. Carley, 1993: Communication at a distance: The influence of print on sociocultural organization and change. Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Kidder, 1981: The soul of a new machine. Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. King, 1994: Analysis of electronic support groups for recovering addicts, in: Interpersonal Computing and Technology, 2, 3. S. 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Kling, T. Jewett, 1994: The social design of worklife with computers and networks: An open natural systems perspective, in: advances in Computers, 39. S. 239–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Kling, 1995: Social relationships in electronic forums: Hangouts, salons, workplaces and communities. Universität von Kalifornien, Department of Information and Computer Sciences and Public Policy Research Organization. Irvine.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Kollock, M. Smith, 1996: Managing the virtual commons: Cooperation and conflict in computer communities, in: S. Herring (Hrsg.): Computer-mediated communication. Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives. Amsterdam. S. 109–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Latané, J. Darley, 1976: Help in a crisis: Bystander response to an emergency. Morristown, N.J

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Laumann, P. Marsden, D. Prensky, 1983: The boundary specification problem in network analysis, in: R. Burt, M. Minor (Hrsg.): Applied Network analysis. Beverly Hills, CA S. 18–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Laumann, J. Gagnon, R. Michael, S. Michaels, 1994: The social organization of sexuality: sexual practices in the United States. Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Lea, R. Spears, 1992: Paralanguage and social perception in computer-mediated commuication, in: Journal of Organizational Computing, 2, 3–4. S. 321–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Lea, R. Spears, 1995: Love at first byte? Building personal relationships over computer networks, in: J. T. Wood, S. Duck (Hrsg.): Understudied relationships: Off the beaten track. Thousand Oaks, CA S. 197–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Levine, 1986: Levine’s atlas of world corporate interlocks. Hanover, NH

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Mantei, R. Baecker, A. Seilen, W. Buxton, T. Milligan, B. Wellman, 1991: Experiences in the use of a media space. Papier zur CHI’91 Conference, April–Mai 1991. New Orleans. S. 203–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Mantel, B. Wellman, 1995: From groupware to netware: Implications for CSCW design. Universität von Toronto: Departments of Computer Science and Sociology. Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. McLuhan, 1962: The Gutenberg galaxy: The making of typographic man. Toronto. W. Michelson, 19762: Man and his urban environment. Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Milgram, 1967: The small-world problem, in: Psychology Today, 1. S. 62–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Mintz, M. Schwartz, 1985: The power structure of american business. Chicago. W. Mitchell, 1995: City of bits: Space, time and the infobahn. Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Mueller, K. Schuessler, H. Costner, 1970: Statistical Reasoning in Sociology. Boston. R. Nisbet, 1962: Community and power. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Nohria, R. G. Eccles (Hrsg.), 1992: Networks and organizations. Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Ogden, 1994: Ploitics in a parallel universe: Is there a future for cyberdemocracy?, in: Futures, 26, 7. S. 713–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. J. Orlikowski, J. Yates, K. Okumara, M. Fujimoto, 1995: Shaping electronic communication: The metastructuring of technology in the context use, in: Organization Science, 6, 4. S. 423–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • R Patton, 1986: Open road. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Rapoport, 1957: Contribution to the theory of random and biased net, in: Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 19. S. 257–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Rheingold, 1993: The virtual community: Homestanding on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Rice, C. Steinfield, 1994: Experiences with new forms of organizational J. E. Andries-sen, R. Roe (Hrsg.): Telematics and work. East Sussex, England. S. 109–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Richards, 1994: Multinet. Simon Fraser Universität, Department of Communication Studies. Burnaby, BC., Kanada.

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Roethlisberger, W. J. Dickson, 1939: Management and the worker. Cambridge, MA J. Salaff, E. Fong, S. L. Wong, 1999: Using social networks to exit Hong Kong, in:

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Wellman, (Hrsg.): Networks in the Global Village. Boulder, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Schwartz, D. C. M. Wood, 1993: Discovering shared interests among people using graph analysis of global electronic mail traffic, in: Communities of the ACM, 36. S. 76–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Scott, 1991: Social network analysis. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. R. Shade, 1994: Is sisterhood virtual? Women on the electronic frontier, in: Transactions of the Royal Society Canada, Serie VI, 5. S. 131–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Shrum, 1990: Status incongruence among boundary spanners: Structure, exchange, and conflict, in: American Sociological Review, 55. S. 496–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Siegel, V. Dubrovsky, S. Kiesler, T. W. McGuire, 1986: Group processes in computer-mediated communication, in: Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 37. S. 157–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Sipior, B. Ward, 1995: The ethical and legal quandary of email privacy, in: Communications of the ACM, 38, 12. S. 48–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Slouka, 1995: War of the worlds: Cyberspace and the high-tech assault on reality. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. J. A. Sprenger, F. Stokman, 1995: Gradap 2. Groningen, Niederlande.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Sproull, S. Kiesler, 1991: Connections. New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge. MA

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Sproull, S. Faraj, 1997: Atheism, sex, and databases: The Net as a social technology, in: S. Kiesler (Hrsg.): Culture of the Internet. Mahwah, NJ S. 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. L. Star, 1993: Cooperation without consensus in scientific problem solving: Dynamics of closure in open systems, in: S. Easterbrook (Hrsg.): CSCW: Cooperation or conflict. Berlin. S. 93–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Steinfield, 1986: Computer-mediated communication in an organizational setting: Explaining task-related and socio-emotional uses, in: Communication Yearbook, 9. S. 777–804.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Stoll, 1995: Silicon snake oil: Second thoughts on the information highway. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Suttles, 1968: The social order of the slum. Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Thompson, 1967: Organizations in action. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Tilly, 1984: Big structures, large processes, huge comparisons. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. B. Walther, 1994: Anticipated ongoing interaction versus channel effects on relational communication in computer-mediated interaction, in: Human Communication Research, 20, 4. S. 473–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. B. Walther, 1995: Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication: Experi- mental observations over time, in: Organization Science, 6, 2. S. 186–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. B. Walther, 1996: Computer-mediated communication: impersonal, interpersonal and hyperpersonal interaction, in: Communication Research, 23, 1. S. 3–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. B. Walther, J. F. Anderson, D. W. Park, 1994: Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A meta-analysis of social and antisocial communication, in: Communication Research, 21, 4. S. 460–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. P. Walsh, T. Bayama, 1996: Computer networks and scientific work, in: Social Studies of Science, 26, 4. S. 661–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Wasserman, K. Faust, 1993: Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Weick, 1976: Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, 21. S. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. P. Weisband, S. K. Schneider, T. Connolly, 1995: Computer-mediated communication and social information: Status salience and status difference, in: Academy of Management Journal, 38, 4. S. 1124–1151.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Wellman, 1988a: The community question re-evaluated, in: M. R. Smith (Hrsg.): Power, community and the city. New Brunswick, NJ S. 81–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Wellman, 1988b: Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance, in: B. Wellman, S. Berkowitz (Hrsg.): Social structures: A network approach. Cambridge, England. S. 19–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Wellman, 1992: Which types of ties and networks give what kinds of social support?, in: Advances in Group Processes, 9. S. 207–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Wellman, 1993: An egocentric network tale, in: Social Networks, 17, 2. 423–436. B. Wellman, 1994: I was a teenage network analyst: The route from the bronx to the information highway, in: Connections, 17, 2. S. 28–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Wellman, B. Leighton, 1979: Networks, neighborhoods and communities, in: Urban Affairs Quarterly, 14. S. 363–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Wellman, P. Carrington, A. Hall, 1988: Networks as personal communities, in: B. Wellman, S. D. Berkowitz (Hrsg.): Social structures: A network approach. Cambridge, England. S. 130–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Wellman, S. Wortley, 1990: Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support, in: American Journal of Sociology, 96. S. 558–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Wellman, J. Salaff, D. Dimitrova, L. Garton, C. Haythornthwaite, 1994: The virtual reality of virtual organizations, Papier für das Jahrestreffen der American Sociological Association, August 1994. Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Wellman, J. Salaff, D. Dimitrova, L. Garton, M. Gulia, C. Haythornthwaite, 1996: Computer networks as social networks: Collaborative work, telework, and virtual community, in: Annual Review of Sociology, 22. S. 213–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Wellman, M. Gulia, 1998: Net surfers don’t ride alone, in: P. Kollock, M. Smith (Hrsg.): Communities in Cyberspace. London. S. 163–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Wellman, S. Potter, 1999: The elements of personal communities, in: B. Wellman (Hrsg.): Networks in the global village. Boulder, CO S. 331–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Winograd, 1988: A language/action perspective on the design of cooperative work, in: Human-Computer Interaction, 3, 1. S. 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Wireman, 1984: Urban neighborhoods, networks, and families. Lexington, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Zuboff, 1984: In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power. New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Udo Thiedeke

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wellman, B. (2000). Die elektronische Gruppe als soziales Netzwerk. In: Thiedeke, U. (eds) Virtuelle Gruppen. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-11761-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-11761-2_6

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-13372-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-663-11761-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics