Abstract
Historical ancestry and geographical proximity underpin the dominant role of two major reference points for institution-building and constitutional reform in Canada: The British Westminster model is the obvious benchmark for the Canadian version of parliamentary (responsible) government. Secured during an early phase of “mega-constitutional politics” (Peter Russell) in the 1840s, it has remained a key element of the Canadian political system ever since its inception in 1867, and hence throughout the protracted transition from colonial dependency to national sovereignty that came to an end with the repatriation of the British North America Act in 1981/82. The prominence of majoritarian principles in the organization of the legislative and executive branches of Canadian government during much of the postwar era was demonstrated by Arend Lijphart (1984). However, 1981/82 also was an important episode in a new phase of “mega-constitutional politics” that had begun in the 1960s and strengthened (federalism) or established (entrenched constitutional provisions and rights, judicial review) a number of institutional features that run against the logic of the Westminster model while being shared with the United States. With the partial exception of the Canadian Senate, the procedures and structures of the legislative and executive branches of government played a clearly subordinate, if visible role in the constitutional reform debates and initiatives of the last few decades, and even organizational changes below that level were quite rare and modest.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alt, James E./ Shepsle, Kenneth A. (eds.) 1990: Perspectives on Positive Political Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Archer, Keith et al. 1995: Parameters of Power. Canada’s Political Institutions, Toronto: Nelson Canada.
Atkinson, Michael M. 1995: “Parliamentary Government in Canada,” in: Michael S. Whittington/ Glen Williams (eds.), Canadian Politics in the 1990s, Toronto: Nelson Canada, 360–381.
Atkinson, Michael M./ Thomas, Paul G. 1993: “Studying the Canadian Parliament,” in: Legislative Studies Quarterly 18, 423–451.
Bagehot, Walter [1867] 1990: “The House of Commons,” in: Norton (ed.), 36-46.
Bakvis, Herman 1991: Regional Ministers. Power and Influence in the Canadian Cabinet, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Bakvis, Herman/ MacDonald, David 1993: “The Canadian Cabinet: Organization, Decision-Rules, and Policy Impact,” in: Michael M. Atkinson (ed.), Governing Canada. Institutions and Public Policy, Toronto: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 47–80.
Bryce, James 1990: “The Decline of Legislatures,” in: Norton (ed.), 47-56.
Cairns, Alan C. 1992: Charter versus Federalism. The Dilemmas of Constitutional Reform, Montreal/Kingston: McGill-Queen’s UP.
Campbell, Colin 1983: Governments Under Stress. Political Executives and Key Bureaucrats in Washington, London, and Ottawa, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Copeland, Gary W./ Patterson, Samuel C. (Hg.) 1994: Parliaments in the Modern World. Changing Institutions, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Courtney, John C. (ed.) 1985: The Canadian House of Commons, Calgary: University of Calgary Press.
Cox, Gary W./ McCubbins, Matthew D. 1993: Legislative Leviathan. Party Government in the House, Berkeley: University of California Press.
D’Aquino, Thomas/ Doern, G. Bruce/ Blair, Cassandra 1983: Parliamentary Democracy in Canada. Issues for Reform, Toronto: Methuen.
Docherty, David C. 1997: Mr Smith Goes to Ottawa. Life in the House of Commons, Vancouver: UBC Press.
Döring, Herbert (ed.) 1995: Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe, Frankfurt, M./New York: Campus/St. Martin’s Press.
Evans, Peter B./ Rueschemeyer, Dietrich/ Skocpol, Theda (eds.) 1985: Bringing the State Back In, Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Franks, C.E.S. 1987: The Parliament of Canada, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Franks, C.E.S. 1999a: “Not Dead Yet, But Should It Be Resurrected? The Canadian Senate,” in: Samuel C. Patterson/ Anthony Mughan (eds.), Senates. Bicameralism in the Contemporary World, Columbus: Ohio State UP, 120–161.
— 1999b: Parliament, Intergovernmental Relations and National Unity, http://www.qsilver.queensu.ca/iigrAVorking.Papers.Series/Franks.html.
Frazer, John A. 1993: The House of Commons at Work, Montreal: Éditions de la Chenelière.
Gunther, Magnus/ Winn, Conrad (eds.) 1991: House of Commons Reform, Ottawa: Parliamentary Intern Program.
Heard, Andrew 1991: Canadian Constitutional Conventions. The Marriage of Law and Politics, Toronto: Oxford UP.
Hofmann, Wilhelm/ Riescher, Gisela 1999: Einführung in die Parlamentarismustheorie, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Hogg, Peter 31992: Constitutional Law of Canada, Toronto: Carswell.
Kluxen, Kurt 1983: Geschichte und Problematik des Parlamentarismus, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
Lijphart, Arend 1984: Democracies. Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries, New Haven/London: Yale UP.
Lijphart, Arend 1987: “Bicameralism: Canadian Senate Reform,” in: Herman Bakvis/ William M. Chandler (eds.), Federalism and the State, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 101–112.
Lijphart, Arend (ed.) 1992: Parliamentary Versus Presidential Government, Oxford: Oxford UP.
Mezey, Michael L. 1993: “Legislatures: Individual Purpose and Institutional Performance,” in: Ada W. Finifter (ed.), Political Science. The State of the Discipline II, Washington: APSA, 335–364.
Moe, Terry M. 1984: “The New Economics of Organization,” in: American Journal of Political Science 28, 739–777.
Moe, Terry M./ Caldwell, Michael 1994: “The Institutional Foundations of Democratic Government: A Comparison of Presidential and Parliamentary Systems,” in: Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 150,1, 171–195.
North, Douglass C. 1990: Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Norton, Philip (ed.) 1990: Legislatures, Oxford: Oxford UP.
Norton, Philip 1993: Does Parliament Matter? London/New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Pal, Leslie A./ Taras, David (eds.) 1988: Prime Ministers and Premiers. Political Leadership and Public Policy in Canada, Scarborough: Prentice-Hall.
Russell, Peter H. et al. 1989: Federalism and the Charter. Leading Constitutional Decisions, Ottawa: Carleton UP.
Saalfeld, Thomas 1995: “Rational-Choice Theory in Legislative Studies: Models of Politics without Romanticism,” in: Journal of Legislative Studies 1,1, 32–64.
Saunders, Cheryl 1995: “Evolution and Adaptation of the British Constitutional System,” in: Joachim Jens Hesse/ Nevil Johnson (eds.), Constitutional Policy and Change in Europe, Oxford: Oxford UP, 67–94.
Savoie, Donald J. 1999a: Governing from the Centre. The Concentration of Power in Canadian Politics, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Savoie, Donald J. 1999b: “The Rise of Court Government in Canada,” in: Canadian Journal of Political Science 32,4, 635–664.
Schneider, Steffen 1997: “Regionale Fragmentierung statt nationaler Integration: Das kanadische Parteiensystem nach den Unterhauswahlen vom 2. Juni 1997,” in: Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 28,4, 664–682.
Schultze, Rainer-Olaf 1996: “Interessenrepräsentation und Westminster-Modell: Kanada — ein abweichender Fall?” in: Staatswissenschaften und Staatspraxis 7,2, 163–193.
Schultze, Rainer-Olaf/ Schneider, Steffen (eds.) 1997: Kanada in der Krise. Analysen zum Verfassungs-, Wirtschafts-und Parteiensystemwandel seit den 80er Jahren, Bochum: Brockmeyer.
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1986: “Institutional Equilibrium and Equilibrium Institutions,” in: Herbert F. Weisberg (ed.), Political Science. The Science of Politics, New York: Agathon, 51–81.
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1989: “Studying Institutions: Some Lessons from the Rational Choice Approach,” in: Journal of Theoretical Politics 1,2, 131–147.
Shepsle, Kenneth A./ Weingast, Barry R. 1987: “The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power,” in: American Political Science Review 81,1, 85–104.
Smith, David E. 1995a: “The Federal Cabinet in Canadian Politics,” in: Michael S. Whittington/ Glen Williams (eds.), Canadian Politics in the 1990s, Toronto: Nelson Canada, 382–401.
Smith, David E. 1995b: The Invisible Crown. The First Principle of Canadian Government, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Steinmo, Sven/ Thelen, Kathleen/ Longstreth, Frank (eds.) 1992: Structuring Politics. Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Strøm, Kaare 1995: “Parliamentary Government and Legislative Organisation,” in: Döring (ed.), 51-82.
Sturm, Roland 1998: “Der kanadische Senat und die Lehren aus den Bemühungen um seine Reform,” in: Zeitschrift für Kanada-Studien 34,1, 53–65.
Thunert, Martin 2000: “Das Westminstermodell in Kanada: Besonderheiten, Leistungen und Zukunftschancen,” in: André Kaiser (ed.), Regieren in Westminster-Demokratien, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 95–119.
Tsebelis, George 1995a: “Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism, and Multipartism,” in: British Journal of Political Science 25,2, 289–325.
— 1995b: “Veto Players and Law Production in Parliamentary Democracies,” in: Döring (ed.), 83-111.
Tsebelis, George 1999: “Veto Players and Law Production in Parliamentary Democracies: An Empirical Analysis,” in: American Political Science Review 93,3, 591–608.
Tsebelis, George/ Money, Jeannette 1997: Bicameralism, New York: Cambridge UP.
Weaver, R. Kent/ Rockman, Bert A. (eds.) 1993: Do Institutions Matter? Government Capabilities in the United States and Abroad, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Weingast, Barry R./ Marshall, William J. 1988: “The Industrial Organization of Congress,” in: Journal of Political Economy 96,1, 132–163.
Weiler, Patrick 1985: First Among Equals. Prime Ministers in Westminster Systems, Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
White, Randall 1990: Voice of Region. The Long Journey to Senate Reform in Canada, Toronto: Dundurn Press.
Zinterer, Tanja 2000: “Der kanadische Senat: ungeliebt, undemokratisch, unreformierbar?” in: Gisela Riescher/ Sabine Russ/ Christoph Haas (eds.), Zweite Kammern, Munich: Oldenbourg, 185–199.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schneider, S. (2000). Parliamentary Government in Canada: Institutional Stability and Constitutional Reform in the Legislative and Executive Branches. In: Schultze, RO., Sturm, R. (eds) The Politics of Constitutional Reform in North America. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-11628-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-11628-8_4
Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-663-11630-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-663-11628-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive