Abstract
When the Supreme Court Justices returned to their marble tower after the summer recess in order to open the term 1999/2000, they were greeted not only by a new docket, but also by a Tom Toles cartoon which depicted them on the bench, wearing not their accustomed black robes, but instead white, Klan-like hoods. They were probably less than thrilled by the unfriendly reference to their recent decisions regarding minority rights and their striking down electoral districts with majorities of minority voters.1 Unfair as it may seem, there is little doubt that the fate of minorities at the Supreme Court has changed quite a bit over the course of the Rehnquist years, especially during the 90s. This paper will take a closer look at some of these changes, and at the preceding years as well. The main focus will be on the Supreme Court, but the other branches of government and their contribution to constitutional reform will be looked at as well, at least in passing. First, however, we have to have a look at the minorities in question.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abraham, Henry J. 31992: Justices and Presidents. A Political History of Appointments to the Supreme Court, New York/Oxford: Oxford UP.
Crane, Daniel A. 1998: The Original Understanding of the “Effects Clause” of Article IV, Section 1 and Implications for the Defense of Marriage Act, 6 Geor. Mason L. Rev. 307.
Currie, David P. 1985: The Constitution in the Supreme Court. The First Hundred Years 1789–1888, Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
Currie, David P. 1990: The Constitution in the Supreme Court. The Second Century 1888–1986, Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
Duncan, Richard F. 1997: Wig stock and the Kulturkampf. Supreme Court Storytelling, the Culture War, and Romer v. Evans, 72 Notre Dame L. Rev. 345.
Goldberg, Carey 1999: “Redefining a Marriage Made New in Vermont,” in: New York Times, December 26.
Greenhouse, Linda 1999: “Justices to Weigh Race Barrier in Hawaiian Voting,” in: New York Times, March 23.
— 2000: “Justices Reject a Voting Provision for Descendants of Original Hawaiians,” in: New York Times, March 24.
Guinier, Lani 1994: The Tyranny of the Majority. Fundamental Fairness in Representative Democracy, New York: Free Press.
Halley, Janet E. 1993: Reasoning about Sodomy. Act and Identity in and after Bowers v. Hardwick, 79 VA L. Rev. 1721.
Hamby, Alonzo L. 1995: Man of the People. A Life of Harry S. Truman, New York/Oxford: Oxford UP.
Howard, John R. 1999: The Shifting Wind. The Supreme Court and Civil Rights from Reconstruction to Brown, Albany: State University of New York Press.
Kaplan, Morris B. 1997: Sexual Justice. Democratic Citizenship and the Politics of Desire, New York/London: Routledge.
Kluger, Richard 1975: Simple Justice. The History of Brown v. Board of Education and Black America’s Struggle for Equality, New York: Vintage Books.
Laponce, Jean A. 1991: “Minorities, protection of,” in: Vernon Bogdanor (ed.), The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Science, Oxford/Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 371–372.
Miller, Merle 1974: Plain Speaking. An Oral Biography of Harry S. Truman, New York: Berkley Publishing Corp.
Myers, Steven Lee 1999: “Gay Group’s Study Finds Military Harassment Rising,” in: New York Times, March 15.
Myrdal, Gunnar 1944: An American Dilemma. The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy, New York: Pantheon Books.
O’Connor, Karen 1992: “Gender,” in: Kermit L. Hall (ed.), The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States, New York/Oxford: Oxford UP, 328–335.
Papadopoulos, Mark E. 1997: Inkblot Jurisprudence. Romer v. Evans as a Great Defeat for the Gay Rights Movement, 7 Cornell J. of L. & Public Policy 165.
Rawls, John 1971: A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
Richards, David A.J. 1998: Women, Gays, and the Constitution. The Grounds for Feminism and Gay Rights in Culture and Law, Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
Riddick, Winston/Riddick, Patricia 1996: Overview of the United States Supreme Court Affirmative Action Decisions in Race and Gender Cases: 1980–1995, 23 S. U.L. Rev. 107.
Rogers, Jerald W. 1997: Romer v. Evans. Heightened Scrutiny Has Found a Rational Basis — Is the Court Tacitly Recognizing Quasi-Suspect Status for Gays, Lesbians, and Bisexuals? 45 Kan. L. Rev. 953.
Rose, Arnold 1968: “Minorities,” in: David L. Sills (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vol. 10, New York/London: Macmillan, 365–371.
Rosen, Jeffrey 1996: The Color-Blind Court, 45 Am. U.L. Rev. 791.
Rothstein, Melissa 1997: The Defense of Marriage Act and Federalism. A States’ Rights Argument in Defense of Same-Sex Marriages, 31 Fam. L.Q. 571.
Schmitt, Eric 1999: “Gay Rights Advocates Plan to Press Clinton to Undo Policy of ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’,” in: New York Times, December 25.
Schwartz, Bernard 1993: A History of the Supreme Court, New York/Oxford: Oxford UP.
Sechting, Stefan 1998: Affirmative Action und Frauenförderung, Osnabrück: Universitätsverlag Rasch.
Seymour, Stephanie K. 1998: “Women as Constitutional Equals: The Burger Court’s Overdue Evolution,” in: Bernard Schwartz (ed.), The Burger Court. Counter-Revolution or Confirmation?, New York: Oxford UP, 66–82.
Shuki-Kunze, Jennie R. 1998: The ‘Defenseless’ Marriage Act. The Constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act as an Extension of Congressional Power Under the Full Faith and Credit Clause, 48 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 351.
Sohn, Louis B. (ed.) 1986: International Organization and Integration. Annotated Basic Documents of International Organizations and Arrangements. Student Edition, Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster: Nijhoff.
Spaeth, Harold J./ Segal, Jeffrey A. 1999: Majority Rule or Minority Will. Adherence to Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court, Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Thernstrom, Abigail M. 1987: Whose Votes Count? Affirmative Action and Minority Voting Rights, Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard UP.
Warren, Earl 1977: The Memoirs of Chief Justice Earl Warren, Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Baker v. Vermont, no. 98-032.
Rice v. Cayetano, no. 98-818.
Slaughterhouse Cases, 16 Wall. (83 U.S.) 36 (1873).
Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989).
United States v. Carolene Products Co., 304 U.S. 144 (1938).
Wisconsin v. Mitchell, 508 U.S. 476 (1993).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dreyer, M. (2000). Race, Gender, Sexual Orientation — Minorities and the Supreme Court. In: Schultze, RO., Sturm, R. (eds) The Politics of Constitutional Reform in North America. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-11628-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-11628-8_10
Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-663-11630-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-663-11628-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive