Zusammenfassung
Rituale und Zeremonien durchziehen das Recht. Das muss nicht negativ sein. Rituale bestimmen fast alle sozialen menschlichen, speziell auch rechtlichen Einrichtungen, die die Aufgabe haben, soziale Konflikte zu lösen. Das Ritualkonzept aber wird in der juristischen Analyse kaum verwendet, noch seltener ist es Gegenstand formaler akademischer Studien. Wenn es überhaupt erwähnt wird, so wird das Ritual im Kontext der rechtlichen Verteidigung diskutiert (Fuller 1945, 799–800). Öfters wird es als Fehler im Rechtssystem behandelt.1
Die Meinungen, die in diesem Artikel vertreten werden, sind jene des Autors und nicht notwendigerweise auch jene der Texas Attorney General. Spezieller Dank geht an: T.D. Rakoff, D. Kertzer, D. Park und J.K. Winn fur ihre Kommentare zu früheren Manuskripten.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Ahern, E.M., 1981: Chinese Ritual and Politics. Cambridge.
Arnold, T., 1935: Symbols of Gouvemment. New Haven.
Atiyah, P.S., 1986: Form and Substance in Contract Law, in: ders., Essays on Contract. Oxford.
Athiya, P.S.; Summers, R.S., 1987: Form and Substance in Anglo-American Law: A Comparative Study of Legal Reasoning, Legal Theory, and Legal Institutions. Oxford.
Austin, J.L., 1965: How To Do Things With Words. New York.
Austin, J.L., 1970: Performative Utterances, in: Philosophical Papers, hrsg. von J.O. Urmson und G.J. Warnock. Oxford.
Bartlett, R., 1986: Trial by Fire and Water: The Mediaeval Judicial Ordeal. Oxford.
Benedict, R., 1937: Ritual, in: Encyclopdia of the Social Sciences 13, 396–397.
Bertleheim, B., 1960: The Informed Heart. Glencoe.
Bloch, M., 1974: Symbols, Song, Dance, and Features of Agricultation: Is Religion an Extreme Form of Traditional Authority?, in: European Journal of Sociology 15.
Bloch, M., 1975: Introduction, in: Political Language in Traditional Society, hrsg. von M. Bloch. London.
Caplan, G.M., 1985: Questioning Miranda, in: Vanderbilt Law Review 38.
Chandler, A.D. Jr., 1977: The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge.
Confusian Analects, 1983: Bk. II, Kp. 3. Taipeh.
Cullen, J.M., 1972: Some Principles of Animal Communication, in: Non-Verbal Communication, hrsg. von R.A. Hinde. Cambridge.
Douglas, M., 1984: Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo (repr. von 1966). London (dt. 1985: Reinheit und Getàhrdung. Berlin ).
Durkheim, E., 1983: The Nature and Evolution of Contract, in: Durkheim and the Law, hrsg. von S. Lukes und A. Scull. New York.
Fernandez, J., 1965: Symbolic Consensus in a Fang Reformative Cult, in: American Anthropologist 67. Fingarette, H., 1972: Confucius — The Secular as Sacred. New York.
Firth, R., 1951: Elements of Social Organization. London.
Frege, G., 1977: Thoughts, in: Logical Investigations, hrsg. von P.T. Geach und R.H. Stoorhoff. Oxford. Friedman, L.M., 1985: History of American Law. 2. Auflage. New York.
Fuller, L., 1945: Consideration and Form, in: Columbia Law Review 45.
Fuller, L., 1958: Positivism and Fidelity to Law, in: Harvard Law Review 71.
Gangi, W., 1973: Confessions: Historical Perspective and a Proposal, in: Houston Law Review 10. Geertz, C., 1973: Religion As a Cultural System, in: The Interpretation of Cultures. New York.
Geertz, C., 1983: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective, in: Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology, 167-234. New York.
Gluckman, M., 1965: Politics, Law, and Ritual in Tribal Society. Chicago.
Gluckman, M., 1967: The Judicial Process Among the Barotse of Nothem Rhodesia (repr. von 1955). Manchester.
Hart, H.L.A., 1961: The Concept of Law. Oxford.
Hay, D., 1975: Property, Authority, and the Criminal Law, in: Albion’s Fatal Tree: Crime and Society in Eighteenth-Century England. New York.
Hempel, C.G., 1966: Philosophy of Natural Science. Englewood Cliffs.
Hoebel, E.A., 1974: The Law of Primitive Man. New York.
Holmes, O.W., 1881: The Common Law, hrsg. von DeWolfe (1963). Boston.
Holmes, O.W., 1897: The Path of the Law, in: Harvard Law Review 10.
Hooper, D.; Whyld, K., 1984: The Oxford Companion to Chess. Oxford.
Horwitz, M.J., 1977: The Transformation of American Law, 1780-1860. Cambridge.
Horwitz, M.J., 1988: The Warren Court, in: University of Chicago Law Review 55.
Hume, D., 1896: A Treatise of Human Nature, bk. III, pt. ii, sec. 5. Oxford.
Hunt, E., 1977: Ceremonies of Confrontation and Submission: The Symbolic Dimension of Indian-Mexican Political Interaction, in: Secular Ritual.
Ihering, R. von, 1913: Law as a Means to an End. Boston.
Jennings, T., 1982: On Ritual Knowledge, in: Journal of Religion 62.
Kennedy, D., 1976: Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication, in: Harvard Law Review 89. Kertzer, D.I., 1988: Ritual Politics and Power. New Haven.
Macaulay, S., 1986: Private Governement. Madison.
Malinowski, B., 1982: Crime and Custom in Savage Society (repr. von 1926). Totowa.
Mather, M.D., 1970: The Treatment of an Obsessive-Compulsive Patient by Discrimination Learning and Reinforcement of Decision-Making, in: Behaviour Research and Therapy 8, 315–18.
Mauss, M., 1975: A General Theory of Magic. New York.
Milsom, S.F.C., 1981: Historical Foundations of the Common Law. 2. Aufl. Toronto.
Moore, S.F., 1978: Legal Liability and Evolutionary Interpretation, in: Law as Process, 83-134. London. Myerhoff, B.G., 1977: We Don’t Wrap Herring in a Printed Page: Fusion, Fiction, and Continuity in Secular Ritual, in: Secular Ritual.
Nicholas, B., 1965: An Introduction to Roman Law. Oxford.
Olivecrona, K., 19712: Law as Fact. London.
Pocock, J.G.A., 1964: Ritual, Language, Power: An Essay on the Apparent Meanings of Ancient Chinese Philosophy, in: Political Science 16.
Pound, R., 1954: Introduction to the Philosophy of Law (repr. von 1922). New Haven.
Roberts, J., 1988: Definition, Functions, and Typology of Rituals, in: Rituals in Families and Family Therapy, hrsg. von Imber-Black, Roberts und Whiting. New York.
Robertson Smith, W., 1927: Lectures on the Religion of the Semites. 3. Auflage. London.
Rosen, L., 1980/1981: Equity and Discretion in a Modern Islamic Legal System, in: Law and Society Review 15, 217-45.
Ryle, G., 1949: The Concept of Mind. New York.
Said, E.W., 1979: Orientalism. New York.
Schwartz, B.I., 1985: The World of Thougt in Ancient China. Cambridge.
Searle, J.R., 1969: Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge.
Seavoy, R.E., 1982: The Origins of the American Business Corporation, 1784-1855. Westport. Staal, F., 1979: The Meaninglessness of Ritual, in: Numen 26.
Tambiah, S.J., 1985: A Performative Approach to Ritual, in: Culture, Thought, and Social Action: An Anthropological Perspective, 123-166. Cambridge.
Turner, V.W., 1967: The Forest of Symbols. Ithaca/NY.
Turner, V.W., 1969: The Ritual Process. Chicago. (dt. 1989: Das Ritual. Struktur und Anti-Struktur. Frankfurt/Main ).
Winn, J.K., 1988: Taiwan Ends Criminal Penalties for Bad Checks in Move to Reform Its Financial System, in: East Asian Executive Report 8, 8 (15. August).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Winn, P.A. (2003). Rechtsrituale. In: Belliger, A., Krieger, D.J. (eds) Ritualtheorien. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-11314-0_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-11314-0_23
Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-531-33238-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-663-11314-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive