Skip to main content

Abstract

Romania has achieved considerable economic progress lately, but is still entangled in its own recent past and risks becoming a chronically unsuccessful EU applicant. While Europe endorsed a big bang enlargement to ten countries, with Romania and Bulgaria to follow in 2007, evidence both historical and contemporary is scarce to prove that economic catch up is possible. More often than not, development tends to group countries in regional clusters, and Romania has belonged so far with the rest of South-Eastern Europa, in the most economically backward group. Comparative analysis shows that the different results achieved by post-communist countries in their turn towards democracy and capitalism depend on the conditions at the onset of the transformation, rather than to the transition management.1 Nevertheless, the extent to which the heritage of communist times was tackled is a crucial factor in explaining successful or failed transitions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. V. Bunce, “The Political Economy of Postsocialism” Slavic Review 58.4 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Regular Report on Romania’s Progress towards Accession, (Brussels: Commission of the European Communities, 13. 11. 2001 ).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Based on: S. Ionita and L. Voinea, “The Challenge of Development” Romanian Annual Early Warning Report ( Bucharest: UNDP and the Romanian Academic Society (SAR ), 2002 ).

    Google Scholar 

  4. The phrase was coined by former Finance Minister Daniel Däianu, see: Romanian Annual Early Warning Report (UNDP) and Romanian Academic Society (SAR): 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  5. The indicator used is the Hirschmann concentration index shows the degree of concentration, or specialisation, in foreign trade. This index varies between 0 and 1 (or 0% and 100%) — normal values correspond, according to UNCTAD calculation (data available for 1998 ), to an average index of 0.16 for transition economies and 0.17 for developed economies. Significantly lower values indicate low concentration (numerous products contribute with small shares in total trade), while significantly higher values indicate high concentration (a few products contribute with large shares in total trade). See: L. Voinea, No Harry Potter in Romanian Foreign Trade, (Bucharest: UNDP and Romanian Academic Society ( SAR ), March. 2002 ).

    Google Scholar 

  6. CEFTA is a free trade area among its members; each member has signed an EU Association Agreement, and the advanced stage of their implementation determines similarities in CEFTA’s external tariff, at least with the EU.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Robert Dahl classified democracies in formal or procedural (formal rules, from free elections to civilian control over the military is accomplished) and substantial (not only the democratic norm is officially set, but compliance with the norms is generalised behavior). See: R.A. Dahl, Democracy and its Critics (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Data released by the Pro-Democracy Association.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Based on BOP Metromedia 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Jervis, “Romania’s Expulsion of Iraqi Diplomat Increases Suspicion of European Spying” Wall Street Journal Europe. (20. 12. 2001 ).

    Google Scholar 

  11. See: M. Comsa, Fetele schimbarii (Bucharest: 1993 ).

    Google Scholar 

  12. According to Eurobarometer,poll by CURS, October 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Unless otherwise specified, public opinion data originates from a survey by SAR-CURS, November 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  14. SAR-CURS poll, representative for urban Romania, August 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 1.6 million Hungarians and roughly one million Roma of a total of 22 million.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Regular Report on Romania’s Progress towards Accession, (Brussels: Commission of the European Communities, 13. 11. 2001 ).

    Google Scholar 

  17. For a thorough review, see: C.. Iordachi: C.. Iordachi, “The Romanian-Hungarian Reconciliation Process. From Conflict to Co-operation ” Romanian Journal of Political Science 2. 3–4 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Such as the Covasna-Harghita scandal provoked by the Romanian Service of Information.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Romania Mare.9 (27.07.1990).

    Google Scholar 

  20. See: A. Mungiu-Pippidi, Transilvania subiectiva (Bucharest: 1999 ).

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. Abraham, S. Chelcea and I. Badescu, Interethnic Relations in Romania (Cluj Napoca: 1995 ).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Romanian Early Warning Report 1.4 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  24. For more details on the concept of ‘particularism,’ see: G. O’Donnell, “Illusions about Consolidation” The Global Divergence of Democracies, eds. L. Diamond and M.F. Plattner (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Pres, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Wim van Meurs

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2003). Romania: the Eternal Candidate?. In: van Meurs, W. (eds) Prospects and Risks Beyond EU Enlargement. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-11183-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-11183-2_12

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-8100-3864-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-663-11183-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics