Abstract
Governance is clearly a notion whose time has come. It appears to move easily across philosophical and disciplinary boundaries, diverse fields of practical application, the manifold scales of social life, and different political camps and tendencies. This terminological mobility enables it to organise significant narratives about contemporary social transformation. Yet it is also clear that governance is a polyvalent and polycontextural notion. Its meaning varies by context and it is being deployed for quite contrary, if not plain contradictory, purposes. And, by virtue of these terminological uncertainties, it is doubtful whether governance sans phrase can really provide a compelling theoretical entrypoint for analysing contemporary social transformation or a compelling practical entrypoint for coping with complexity. It is this paradox that I wish to pursue and resolve in the following reflections on governance, with the ultimate intention of providing a clear account of the nature and limitations of governance and meta-governance in a complex world.1
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Amin, A. and Thrift, N. (1995) ‘Globalisation, institutional “thickness” and the local economy’, in P. Healey, S. Cameron, S. Davoudi, S. Graham, and A. MadaniPour, eds., Managing Cities: the New Urban Context, Chichester: John Wiley, 91–108.
Ashby, W.R. (1956) Introduction to Cybernetics, London: Chapman and Hall.
Capello, R. (1996) ‘Industrial enterprises and economic space: the network paradigm’, European Planning Studies, 4 (4), 485–98.
Coulson, A. (1997) “Transaction cost economics” and its implications for local governance’, Local Government Studies, 23 (1), 107–13.
Coriat, B. and Dosi, G. (1994) ‘Learning how to govern and learning how to solve problems: on the coevolution of competences, conflicts, and organisational routines’, in A.D. Chandler, P. Hagström, and Ü. Sölvell, eds., The Dynamic Firm: the Role of Technology, Strategy, Organization, and Regions, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 103–33.
Dean, M. (2002) ‘Culture governance and individualisation’, in H. Bang, ed., Governance, Govemmentality and Democracy, Manchester: Manchester University Press (in press).
Dierkes, M., Antal, A.B., Child, J., and Nonaka, I., eds., (2001) Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eder, K. (1999) ‘Societies learn and yet the world is hard to change’, European Journal of Social Theory, 2 (2), 195–215.
Fukuyama, F. (1995) Trust: the Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, New York: Free Press.
Grabher, G. (1994) Lob der Verschwendung, Berlin: Edition Sigma.
Haber, H. F. (1994) Beyond Post-Modern Politics: Lyotard, Rorty and Foucault, London: Routledge.
Haas, P.M. and Haas, E.B. (1995) ‘Learning to learn: improving international governance’, Global Governance, 1 (4), 255–285
Hutcheon, L. (1994) Irony’s Edge: the Theory and Politics of Irony, London: Routledge.
Jessop, B. (1997) ‘The governance of complexity and the complexity of governance: preliminary remarks on some problems and limits of economic guidance’, in A. Amin and J. Hausner, eds., Beyond Markets and Hierarchy: Interactive Governance and Social Complexity, Chelmsford: Edward Elgar, 111–147.
Jessop, B. (1998) ‘The rise of governance and the risks of failure: the case of economic development’, International Social Science Journal, issue 155, 29–46
Jessop, B. (1999) ‘Governance failure’, in G. Stoker, ed., The New Politics of Local Governance in Britain, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 11–32.
Jessop, B. (2002a) The Future of the Capitalist State, Cambridge: Polity.
Jessop, B. (2002b) ‘Governance and meta-governance. On reflexivity, requisite variety, and requisite irony’, in H. Bang, ed., Governance, Governmentality and Democracy, Manchester: Manchester University Press (in press).
Kooiman, J. (2000) ‘Societal governance: levels, models, and orders of social-political interaction’, in J. Pierre (ed.) Debating governance: authority, steering, and democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 138–64.
Kooiman, J. (2002) ‘Activation in governance’, in H. Bang, ed., Governance, Governmentality and Democracy, Manchester: Manchester University Press (in press).
Larmour, P. (1997) ‘Models of governance and public administration’, International Political Science Review, 63 (4), 383–94.
Malpas, J. and Wickham, G. (1995) ‘Governance and failure: on the limits of sociology’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 31 (3), 37–50.
Mayntz, R. (1993) ‘Governing failures and the problem of governability: some comments on a theoretical paradigm’, in J. Kooiman, ed., Modern Governance: new Government-Society Interactions, London: Sage, 9–20.
Mayntz, R. (1993) ‘Modernization and the logic of interorganizational networks’, in J. Child, M. Crozier, R. Mayntz et al., Societal Change between Market and Organization, Aldershot: Avebury, 3–18.
Mayntz, R. (2001) ‘Zur Selektivität der steuerungstheoretischen Perspektive’, Köln: Max Planck Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung. http://www.mpi-fg-koeln.mpg.de/publikation/working jap../wp01–1.htm, accessed 14/05/2001
Messner, Dirk (1997) The Network Society, London: Frank Cass.
Muecke, D.C. (1970) Irony, London: Methuen.
Müller, F. (2001) Demokratie in der Defensive. Funktionelle Abnutzung — soziale Exklusion — Globalisierung, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
O’Dowd, M.C. (1978) ‘The problem of “government failure” in mixed economies’, South African Journal of Economics, 46 (3), 360–70.
Putnam, R.D. (2000) Bowling Alone: the Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York: Simon & Schuster.
Rescher, N. (1998) Complexity: a Philosophical Overview, New Brunswick: Transaction Books.
Rorty, R. (1989) ‘Private irony and liberal hope’, in Idem, Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 73–95.
Scharpf, F.W. 1994: Games Real Actors could Play: Positive and Negative Coordination in Embedded Negotiations, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6 (1), 27–53.
Wallis, J. and Dollery, B. (1999) Market Failure, Government Failure, Leadership and Public Policy, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Willke, H. (1997) Ironie des Staates: Grundlinien einer Staatstheorie polyzentrischer Gesellschaft, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Willke, H. (2001) Atopia. Studien zur atopischen Gesellschaft, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jessop, B. (2002). Governance and Meta-governance in the Face of Complexity: On the Roles of Requisite Variety, Reflexive Observation, and Romantic Irony in Participatory Governance. In: Heinelt, H., Getimis, P., Kafkalas, G., Smith, R., Swyngedouw, E. (eds) Participatory Governance in Multi-Level Context. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-11005-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-11005-7_2
Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-8100-3614-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-663-11005-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive