Skip to main content

Public Domains, Organizations and Neo-Liberal Economics: From De-Regulation and Privatization to the Necessary “Smart” State

  • Chapter
New Public Service

Abstract

The last twenty years have seen the fundamental re-structuring of many public sectors. Policy-makers have increasingly looked to markets to overcome political conflicts triggered by the perceived increase in the scarcity of resources, including the once-sacrosanct public domain of social security (Dixon/Hyde 2001; Dixon/Kouzmin 2001a; 2001b). The “hollowing out” of the Keynesian welfare state (Dixon/Scheurell 2002) and the widespread acceptance of the idea of “less state and less taxes” raises serious policy questions of social resilience and the governance capacities in these diverse jurisdictions (Boyer/Drache 1996). Conventional wisdom about the convergent effects of economic globalization gives further weight to these questions, especially since significant differences in public policy responses tend to be ignored (Kouzmin/Hayne 1999). This neglect of the apparent divergence in policy outcomes and expenditure practices — especially in labour market strategies — underscores the need to audit critically, both comparatively and sectorally, systematic differences in the management of market failures and the social distortions that flow from the re-location of the public-private sector boundary in favour of the market-place (Berger/Dore 1996; Dixon/Kouzmin 1994a; 1994b; Dixon/Dogan/Kouzmin 2002).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, G.B., Ingersoll, V.H. (1990):,Culture, technical rationality and organizational culture’, American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 20, No. 4, December, pp. 285–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, M. (1993): Capitalisme contre capitalisme, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alchian, A.A., Demsetz, H. (1972):,Production, information costs and economic organization’, American Economic Review, Vol. 62, No. 4, December, pp. 777–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleton, B. (1994): Navigating AFTA, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J. (1985):, The economics of agency’, in: Pratt, J.W., Zeckhauser, R.J. (eds.): Principals and agents: The structure of business, Boston, pp. 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bearle, A. A., Means, G.C. ( 1932, 1991 ): The modern corporation and rivate property, New Brunswick.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. ( 1789, 1970 ): An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, S., R. Dore (eds.; 1996 ): National diversity and global capitalism, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaug, M. (1993):,Pieter Henniepman on Paretian welfare economics: A comment’, Economist–Leiden, Vol. 141, No. 1, pp. 127–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borins, S.F. (1992):,Statecraft: The effective use of political power’, Business Quarterly, Vol. 57, No. 2, Autumn, pp. 52–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R., Drache, D. (eds.; 1996 ): States against markets: The limits of globalization, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breton, A. (1974): The economic theory of representative government, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromely, D.W. (1990):,The ideology of efficiency: Searching for a theory of policy analysis’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 19, No. 1, July, pp. 86–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, J.M., Ring, P.S. (1990):,A transaction-based approach to policy intervention’, Policy Sciences, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 205–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caiden, G.E. (1994):,Management 2000’, International Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 17, No. 3–4, pp. 757–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. (1937):,The nature of firms’, Economica (new series): Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 386405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahrendorf, R. (1995):,A precarious balance: Economic opportunity, civil society and political liberty’, The Responsive Community, Vol. 5, No. 3, Summer, pp. 13–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Alessi, L. (1983): `Property rights, transaction costs and X-efficiency’, American Economic Review, Vol$173, No. 1, March, pp. 64–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilulio, J.J. (ed.; 1994 ): De-regulating the public sector, Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J. (2002): Responses to governance: The governing of corporations, societies and the world, Westport, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J., Dogan, R. (2002a):,Hierarchies, networks and markets: Responses to societal governance failures’, Administrative Theory and Praxis, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 175–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J., Dogan, R. (2002b)., Towards constructive corporate governance: From certainties to a plurality principle’, The Journal of the Philosophy of Management ( forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J., Dogan, R., Kouzmin, A. (2002):,The dilemma of privatized public services: Philosophical frames in understanding failure and managing partnership terminations’, paper presented to the 2002 Annual Conference of the British Academy of Management, London, September, pp. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J., Hyde, M. (eds.; 2001 ): The marketization of social security, Westport.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J., Kouzmin, A. (1994a):,Management innovations for improving governance: changes and trends in Australian public administration and finance’, Asian Review of Public Administration, Vol. 6, No.s 1 and 2, pp. 33–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J., Kouzmin, A. (1994b):,The commercialization of the Australian public sector: competence, elitism or default in management education?’, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 7, No. 6, pp. 52–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J., Kouzmin, A. (2001a):,The privatization of social security: governance challenges to partnership provision’, The Asian Review of Public Administration, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 54–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J., Kouzmin, A. (200lb):,The market appropriation of statutory social security: global experiences and governance issues’. In: Dixon J., Hyde, M. (eds.): The marketization of social security, Westport, pp. 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J., Kouzmin, A., Korac-Kakabadse, N. (1998):,Managerialism - something old, something borrowed, little new: Economic prescription versus effective organizational change in public agencies’, The International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 11, No.s 2/3, pp. 164–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J., Scheurell, R.P. (eds.; 2002 ): The state of social welfare: The Twentieth Century in cross-national review, Westport, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran, G. (1992):,Rational choice and the policy sciences’, Policy Studies Review, Vol. 11, No.s 3/4, pp. 359–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1967): Inside bureaucracy, Boston. Drucker, P.F. ( 1993 ): Post-capitalist society, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunsire, A. (1988):,Organizational status and performance: A conceptual framework for testing public choice theories’, Public Administration, Vol. 66, No. 4, pp. 363–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egon, M., Streeck, W. (eds.; 1991 ): Beyond Keynesianism, Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallows, J. (1994): Looking at the sun the rise of the new East Asian economic and political system, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E.F. (1980):,Agency problems and the theory of the firm journal of political economy’, Vol. 88, No. 2, pp. 288–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellow, K., Kelaher, M. (1991):,Managing government the corporate way’, Australian Accountant, Vol. 61, No. 3, pp. 22–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finer, H. (1941, 1966):,Administrative responsibility in democratic government’. Reprinted in Woll, P. (ed.): Administration and policy: Selected essays, New York, 1966, pp. 247–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flam, H. (1990):,Emotional man 2: Corporate actors as emotion-motivated, emotion managers’, International Sociology, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 225–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, R.G. (ed.; 1984 ): Utility and rights, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, C.J. (1940, 1966):,Public policy and the nature of administrative responsibility’. Reprinted in: Woll, P. (ed.): Administration and policy: Selected essays, New York, 1966, pp. 221–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J.K. (1995): The world economy since the wars: A personal view, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golembiewski, R.T., Kuhnert, K.W. (1994):,Barnard on authority and zones of indifference: Towards perspectives on the decline of managerialism`, International Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 17, No. 6, pp. 595–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, R.A. (1973):,Environmental knowledge and organizational time horizons: Some functions and dysfunctions’, Human Relations, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 54–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodsell, C.T. (1989):,Public administration as ritual’, Public Administration Review, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 161–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorovitz, S. (ed.; 1977 ): Utilitarianism with critical essays, Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. (1999):, Structural adjustment, privatization and the public bureaucracy’, in: Kouzmin, A., Hayne, A. (eds.): Essays in economic globalization, transnational policies and vulnerability, Amsterdam, pp. 219–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halfpenny, P. (1982): Positivism and sociology, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hague, S. (1999):, Globalization of market ideology and its impact on Third-World development’, in: Kouzmin, A., Hayne, A. (eds.): Essays in economic globalization, transnational policies and vulnerability, Amsterdam, pp. 75–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. (1960): The constitution of liberty, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckathorn, D.B., Maser, S.M. (1987):,Bargaining and the transaction costs: The case of government regulation’, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 69–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hede, A. (1991):,Trends in the higher Civil Service of Anglo-American systems’, Governance, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 489–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensher, D.A. (1986):,Privatization: an interpretative essay’, Australian Economic Papers, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 147–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertz, N. (2002): The silent takeover: global capitalism and the death of democracy, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A.O. (1970): Exit, voice and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations and States, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A.O. (1991): The rhetoric of reaction: perversity, futility, jeopardy, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A.O. (1995):, Convergences with Michel Crozier’ in: Hirschman, A.O. (ed.): A propensity of self-subversion, Cambridge, pp. 139–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, J. (1977):,Shakespeare versus Becker on altruism: The importance of ha- ving the last word’, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 500–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P., Thompson, G. (1996): Globalization in question, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogarth, R.M., Reder, M.W. (1987):, Introduction: Perspectives from economics and psychology’, in Hogarth, R.M., Reder, M.W. (eds.): Rational choice: The contrast between economics and psychology, Chicago, pp. 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollis, M. (1994): The philosophy of social science: An introduction, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingraham, P.W., Peters, B.G. (1988):,The conundrum of reform: a comparative analysis’, Review of Public Personnel Administration, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J., Kouzmin, A. (1998):,Who are the rent seekers?: From the ideological attack on public officials to the “Pork Barrel” par excellence–Privatization and outsourcing as oligarchic corruption’, Administrative Theory and Praxis, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 491–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jun, J. ( ed.; 2001 ):, The Asian crisis: Its sources, administrative inefficiency and corruption’, Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management (Special Issue): Vol. 9, No. I, pp. 1–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, H. (1981):,Fear of bureaucracy: A raging pandemic’, Public Administration Review, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelsey, J. (1995): The New Zealand experiment: A world model for structural adjustment?, Auckland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouzmin, A. (1998):,Economics and globalization–from the “dismal” science to crude ideology and the demise of credibility of economics in public policy’, Administrative Theory and Praxis, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 388–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouzmin, A. (2002):,The new political economy of the “smart state”: Transitions in governance capacities–an editorial’, Administrative Theory and Praxis, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouzmin, A., Hayne, A. (1999):, Globalization: Rhetorical trends and unpalatable realities for public sectors’, in: Kouzmin, A., Hayne, A. (eds.): Essays in economic globalization, transnational policies and vulnerability, Amsterdam, pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouzmin, A., Jarman, A.M.G. (1999):,De-institutionalizing group-think: From the welfare state towards cyber-netizenship and the smart state’, Administrative Theory and Praxis, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 474–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouzmin, A., Jarman, A.M.G. (2002):, From welfare and contract states: Towards “smart state” policy capacities’, in: Jun J.S. (ed.): Rethinking administrative theory: The challenge of the Century, Westport, pp. 233–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouzmin, A., Dixon, J., Korac-Kakabadse, N. (2001):, From self-referential economics to managerialism and the “economic Holocaust” of down-sizing/re-engineering: A global reckoning begins?`, in: Thorne, K., Turner, G. (eds.): Global Business Regulation: Some Research Perspectives, Frenchs Forest, pp. 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouzmin, A., Korac-Kakabadse, N., Jarman, A.M.G. (1996):,Economic rationalism, risk and institutional vulnerability’, Risk Decision and Policy, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 229–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouzmin, A., Leivesley, R., Korac-Kakabadse, N. (1997):,From managerialism and economic rationalism: Toward “re-inventing” economic ideology and administrative diversity’, Administrative Theory and Praxis, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 19–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouzmin, A., Scott, N. (eds.; 1990 ): Dynamics in Australian public management: Selective essays, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuttner, R. (2002):,Can liberals save capitalism (again)?: Seven decades after the great depression, democrats have their work cut out for them’, The American Prospect, 12 August, pp. 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porte, T.D. (1996):,High reliability organizations: Unlikely, demanding and at risk’, Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, Vol. 4, No. 20, pp. 60–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, J.E. (1985): State and market: The politics of the public and the private, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham, M. (1998): Civilizing global capital: new thinking for Australian Labor, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott, J. R. Jr. (1987):,The effect of non-transferable property rights on the efficiency of political markets’, Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 231–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, S.H. (2002):,Globalization and risk: a contingent response for democratic governance’, Administrative Theory and Praxis, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 31–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacPherson, M. S. (1984):,On shelling, Hirschman and Sen: Revisiting the conception of the self, Partisan Review, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 236–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G., Olsen. J.R. (1983):,Organizing political life: what administrative reorganization tells us about government`, American Political Science Review, Vol. 77, No. 2, pp. 281–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, H. (1982): Selfishness, altruism and rationality, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marini, F. (1993):,Leaders in the field: Dwight Waldo’, Public Administration Review, Vol. 53, No. 5, pp. 409–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Micklethwait, J., Wooldridge, A. (1997): The witch doctors: what the management gurus are saying, why it matters and how to make sense of it?, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moe, T. (1984):,The new economics of organization’, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 759–777.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moe, T. (1987):,Interests, institutions and positive theory: The politics of the NLRB’, Studies in American Political Development, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 236–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W.A. (1975):,Bureaucrats and politicians’, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 617–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W.A. (1994): Bureaucracy and public economics, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noll, R.G., Fiorina, M.P. (1979):,Voters, bureaucrats and legislators: a rational perspective on the growth of bureaucracy’, Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 239–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, W. (1995): Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis, Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlman, M. (1976):, Party politics and bureaucracy in economic policy’, in: Tullock, G. (ed.): The vote motive: An essay in the economics of politics, with applications to the british economy, Institute of Economic Affairs, London, pp. 59–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perroux, F. (1950):,Economic space: theory and applications’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Voi. 64, No. 1, pp. 89–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perroux, F. (1962): Le capitalisme: Que sais-je?, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J.L., Wise, L.R. (1990):,The motivational bases of public service’, Public Administration Review, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 367–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B.G. (1994):,Managing the hollow state’, International Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 17, No.s 3–4, pp. 739–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B.G., Savoie, D. (eds.; 1995 ): Governance in a changing environment, Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C. (1990): Managerialism and the public services: the Anglo-American experience, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasser, S. (1990):, Reforming the public sector: Strategies for change’, in: Kouzmin A., Scott, N. (eds.): Dynamics in Australian public management: Selected essays, Melbourne, pp. 185–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H.W., Webber, M. (1973):,Dilemmas in a general theory of planning’, Policy Sciences, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 155–169 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, U. (1990):, Politics and administration: Max Webber and the quest for democratic order’, in: Kouzmin, A., Scott, N. (eds.): Dynamics in Australian public management: Selected essays, Melbourne, pp. 392–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S.A. (1973):,The economic theory of agency: The principal’s problem’, American Economic Review, Vol. 63, No. 2, pp. 134–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, de S.B. (1995): Towards a new common sense law, science and politics in the paradigmatic transition, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1957): Administrative behaviour: a study of decision-making processes in administrative organization, 2nd ed., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1982): Models of bounded rationality, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J.J.C., Williams, B. (eds.; 1973): Utilitarianism: for and against, Cambridge. Stiglitz, J. (1986): The economics of the public sector, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, J. (1993): An introductory guide to cultural theory and popular culture, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, S. (1995):,The defective state’, Daedalus, Vol. 124, No. 2, pp. 55–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrell, K. (1993): `Public-private wage differentials in Haiti: do public servants earn a rent?’, Journal of Development Economics, Volume 12, No. 2, pp. 293–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1965): The politics of bureaucracy, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1976): The vote motive: an essay in the economics of politics, with applications to the british economy, Institute of Economic Affairs, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, T. (1996):, Economic rationalism versus the entitlement consensus’, Policy Centre for Independent Studies, Sydney, Spring, pp. 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ventriss, C. (2002):,The rise of the entrepreneurial state governments in the United States: the dilemma of public governance in an era of gloablization`, Administrative Theory and Praxis, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 81–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vining, A.R and Weimer, D.L. (1988):,Information asymmetry favouring sellers: A policy framework’, Policy Sciences, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 205–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Mises, L. (1944): Bureaucracy, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldo, D. (1984): The administrative state: A study of the political theory of American public administration, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wholey, J.S. (1993):,Evaluation and performance’, Australian Accountant, Vol. 63, No. 11, pp. 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J. (ed.; 1994 ): The political economy of policy reform, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. (1985): The economic institutions of capitalism: firm, markets, rational contracting, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1997): The state in a changing world, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, K. (1979):,Values in the policy process’, Policy and Politics, Vol. 5, pp. 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dixon, J., Kouzmin, A. (2003). Public Domains, Organizations and Neo-Liberal Economics: From De-Regulation and Privatization to the Necessary “Smart” State. In: Koch, R., Conrad, P. (eds) New Public Service. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-10900-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-10900-6_13

  • Publisher Name: Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-409-11850-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-663-10900-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics