Sovereignty and Citizenship: Realms of Schizoid Perception in Britain in Relation to Television’s Mediation of Europe

  • J. Mallory Wober


Although Rosengren (1995) has described a multidisciplinary arena in which there may be a parity of esteem between researchers who occupy different scientific traditions, some psychologists (eg., Argyle, 1994) are at least wary of the work of sociologists, let alone any such as postmodernists who may be outside the pale of scientific orthodoxy. This may be because the former feel that the latter indulge in opinionation; interpretations are asserted which do not spring from “controlled” investigation (or sometimes, even without any). On the other hand some sociologists are critical of psychologists as being reductionist and artificial in the narrowing of questions, or of situations, beyond the point at which they regard the application of the results to real life situations as credible.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Argyle, M. (1994). Reply to Carol Owens. BPS Social Psychology Section Newsletter, No 30, Winter 1993/4, p. 28.Google Scholar
  2. Bakhtin, M (1965). Rabelais and his world (trans. H. Iswolsky). Cambridge, Mass: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
  3. Charlton, M. (1995). Media communications: Research in psychology, sociology and linguistic conversation analysis. In P. Winterhoff-Spurk (Ed.), Psychology of media in Europe. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  4. Docker, J. (1994). Postmodernism and popular culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the New Left Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  6. King, A.C. (1995). The Problem of Identity & The Cult of Cantona. Salford Papers in Sociology No 15, University of Salford.Google Scholar
  7. Rosengren, K.E. (1995). Three perspectives on media and communication studies in Europe, In P. Winterhoff-Spurk (Ed.), Psychology of media in Europe. Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  8. Turner, V. (1980). Social dramas and stories about them. Critical Enquiry, Autumn, 141–168.Google Scholar
  9. Wagner-Pacifici, R.E. (1986). The Moro morality play. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Wober, J.M. (1990). From house to house: Bringing the Commons home to British viewers. London: ITC Research Department, Reference Paper.Google Scholar
  11. Wober, J.M. (1994). Television and the European election of 1994: A preliminary account of three surveys. Department of Media Production, Bournemouth University.Google Scholar
  12. Wober, J.M. (1995). The European election of 1989: The role of television. British Journal of Social Psychology, in press.Google Scholar
  13. Wober, J.M. & Bovill, M. (1990). Television in the Commons members’ experience of and attitudes concerning the experiment. Report in the Library of the House of Commons.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Mallory Wober

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations